|
|
May 20, 2013
|
|
Questions Arise About Possible Coulter PlagiarismPosted on Jun 12, 2006
Blogger Rude Pundit notes that passages from the conservative hatemonger’s new book are similar to previously published writings by other writers.
Advertisement Previous item: Buzzflash: Why Not Just Put Zarqawi’s Head on a Pike? Next item: Doctors Call for Fat Tax New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By joel koury, June 13, 2006 at 2:03 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
To Mr. McClure:
If she uses a sentence without attributing it to the original source that IS plagiarism. According to the Oxford dictionary, plagiarism is defined as: “taking someone’s words or ideas as if they were your own.”
Taking an off point and out of context passage from a hundred and fifty year old case won’t change the fact that she is a plagiarist.
Report thisBy C Quil, June 13, 2006 at 8:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The copied bits are probably the only sensible bits in her books. The rest is drug- and booze-fueled hatred and venom. Who buys that stuff?
Report thisBy R. A. Earl, June 12, 2006 at 9:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Would someone please explain why I, or ANYONE, should give a damn what Coulter writes, says or does?
Report thisBy mw, June 12, 2006 at 6:16 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Hmmmmm.
And I thought I was posting about *her* ad hominem attacks in my Godless review:
http://westanddivided.blogspot.com/2006/06/ann-hominem-coulter-some-godless-notes.html
I wonder who’s personal attacks they really are? - mw
Report thisBy Phil McClure, June 12, 2006 at 5:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
You’re kidding me, she uses one sentence and that’s considered plagarisim. How much content of Jayson Blair’s columns were lifted from other sources? A sentence? A paragraph? Large passages?
“A reviewer may fairly cite largely from the original work, if his design be really and truly to use the passages for the purposes of fair and reasonable criticism.” Folsom v. Marsh, 9 F.Cas. 342 (1841)
Report thisBy Farakon, June 12, 2006 at 4:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
To all Ann Coulter has to say, has said or ever will say I have only one reply.
Follow the link:
http://coulteredit.ytmnd.com/
Report this