Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Left Masthead
August 30, 2015
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Get Truthdig's headlines in your inbox!

Climate Models May Misjudge Soils’ Carbon Emissions

Fortune Smiles
When Robots Run the Show

Truthdig Bazaar more items

Ear to the Ground
Print this item

Buzzflash: Why Not Just Put Zarqawi’s Head on a Pike?

Posted on Jun 12, 2006
From The Guardian

Abu Musab al Zarqawi

The editors at Buzzflash argue that in displaying the picture of Zarqawi’s dead, bloated face the way it did,  the Bush administration is once again displaying the same kind of sophomoric bravado (“Bring ‘em on”) that it used to its great detriment in the past.

  • Read Truthdig contributor Nir Rosen’s account of the life, death and intellectual underpinnings of Zarqawi.

  • Also: Buzzflash just won two Project Uncensored awards for contributor columns about U.S. civilian detention camps and “net neutrality.”

  • Buzzflash:

    ... But we do know that the barbaric golden framed photos of al-Zarqawi’s bloated, blood-splotched face—displayed almost instantly at Pentagon news briefings—was akin to Bush’s “Bring ‘em on” statement that put our troops at such great risk. Indeed, Bush’s sophomoric bravado a couple of years back resulted in egging on the insurgents and more deaths for our military men and women. And this latest “displaying the enemy’s ear” PR initiative is going to backfire in the same way.


    More Below the Ad


    Square, Site wide

    New and Improved Comments

    If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

    By native child, June 13, 2006 at 4:50 pm Link to this comment
    (Unregistered commenter)

    The bring’em on analogy is appropriate but, to be more precise,  the US military itself has used the head on a Pike display many times in the past, most notoriiously in the mid-nineteenth century against own own inidigenous people.  There are pictures from that period (the most notorious were from Denver, Colorado) which confirm this.  Then, moving to the Philippines at the end of that same century,  there were more beheadings (with pictures of such also readily available today) of natives whose only “crime”, again,  was that of resisting the invading armed forces of the USA..  Of course our president will insist that America would never resort to such a cruel and inhumane practice as beheading, but our past speaks for itself.  As for the present?  When it’s a matter of beating down the natives, our method of choice for collective punishment is shooting innocent women and children, as in Haditha.  .

    Report this

    By April, June 12, 2006 at 7:04 pm Link to this comment
    (Unregistered commenter)

    I didn’t think of “Bring it on” so much, but more ironic it is that our government tries to prevent photos of the coffins of our dead soldiers being published, let photos of actual bodies.  It’s a double standard.

    Report this
    Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
    Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
    Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide
    Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
    Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network

    Like Truthdig on Facebook