![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Sex is Essential, Kids Aren’tPosted on Jun 6, 2006Thirty percent of German women are childless--the highest proportion of any country in the world. And it’s intentional. Why? Because they can be. Free will, baby. A professor of psychology examines what this trend augurs for conservatives who wring their hands at the thought of people enjoying sex outside the context of procreation.
Previous item: Updike's 'Terrorist' a Bomb, Says New York Times Next item: Sanity: Gay Marriage Ban Fails in Senate Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Ga, June 7, 2006 at 8:51 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Human beings are moving beyond evolution. Perhaps a better term would be we are getting around evolution.
We have been for a long time keeping people alive and well and breeding through medicine and technology that would otherwise not survived through “natural selection.” Blindness, deafness, diabetes, etc., so many aspects of health that would limit a human’s growth and long life no longer are limitations.
Now we have in the 21st Century entered the realm of genetic engineering.
Humans have gone way beyond any “fundamental imperative of natural selection” to procreate to continue our species. We are the top species and are no longer competing with any other.*
Indeed, we human beings still have not faced the facts of overpopulating in certain areas in excess of successful management of natural resources.
* but ourselves.
Report thisBy Lynchmom, June 7, 2006 at 5:37 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
It seems to me there is another reason for not having children besides the personal. If we are to follow the wisdom of the animal kingdom, we would increase our productivity when the species is in decline and decrease it in times of overpopulation. There are simply too many people in the world. Chosing to not contribute to this problem seems in the best interest of our genetic future, not the opposite.
Report this