|
|
May 19, 2013
|
|
Anti-U.S. Riots in Kabul Show Mission UnaccomplishedPosted on May 29, 2006
A traffic incident in the Afghan capital led to rumors of an American-on-Afghan massacre. Massive riots ensued. Bitter resentment of occupying U.S. forces has been laid bare. “Today has set us back 10 years,” said a NATO-employed Afghani security worker.
Advertisement Previous item: Frist on America’s Top Priorities: Gay Marriage and Flag Burning Next item: CBS Crew Members Die in Baghdad Attack New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Tantrum, May 29, 2006 at 7:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Yegads!
All this because the brakes on a truck failed???? And of course the compulsory shootings into the stone throwing crowd!
Big disasters from small beginnings.
Looks like we got to learn about foreign policy from scratch.
Agreeing with the first response: it helps if someone has some idea about the countries we are “helping”.
Also helps to train the troops better.
It never was a good idea to let an illiterate and unworldly fool become our GREAT LEADER.
Osama Bin Laden is winning!
Fools are following his script.
T.
Report thisBy rkx13, May 29, 2006 at 6:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The press, the congress and/or the people should call Cheney out tomorrow morning and have him explain our Afghanistan policy.
Report thisBy Wolfhard, May 29, 2006 at 4:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
And the Dutch governemnt was so eager to send our soldiers into this open-air psychiatric clinic, although they know Afghanistan will go down the drain, bastards. Afhanistan is not a failed state, it’s a failed people.
Report thisLike Bismarck once said, (an advice so eagerly ignored by the the idiot German emperor).
‘The Balkan is not worth the live of one German soldier.’
Refrasing that quote is long due:
‘The islamic world is not worth the live of one Wester soldier.’
By Hilding Lindquist, May 29, 2006 at 3:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Tony Blair said:
“Mr Blair said nations might not agree with the original decision to invade Iraq, be critical of mistakes made by the coalition, or wonder if it was all worth the sacrifice. ‘But surely we must all accept this is a genuine attempt to run the race of liberty,’ he said.”
http://www.sundaytimes.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,7034,19276313%5E950,00.html
I think it is reasonable to assume he means Afghanistan as well is in the race of liberty.
Tony is nuts! straight up NUTS! (G.W. is dumb. straight up DUMB!)
There is no liberty without security! (Oh yes, there can be security without liberty.)
Liberty is me at age 67 walking my dog alone in the South Mountain Reservation without fear ... or any number of examples, none of which apply to Afghanistan or Iraq that I am aware of.
Freedom is not being able to vote without fear. It is being able to run for elected office without fear.
When will enough of our incredibly gifted and dedicated young people have died in what is now a refusal of Bush and Blair to admit how wrong they were?
When will enough men, women, and children of Iraq and Afghanistan have died for us to realize that they, too, will keep on dying for what THEY believe? And the patriotism THEY feel?
My god, what have we done? There is no undoing of it. Ever.
Report thisBy rkx13, May 29, 2006 at 1:34 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The press, the congress ,the people should call Cheney out tomorrow morning and have him explain our Afghanistan policy.
Report thisBy Jean Luc, May 29, 2006 at 10:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This is your brain on french-fries!
Amazing! Why is the U.S. in afghanistan? Oh yes, I remember now - the U.S. is spreading democracy and freedom to the nomadic hordes.
Is world history taught at U.S. universities? Apparently, NOT!
JL
Report this