Gonzales: We May Prosecute Journalists

			March 21, 2010 Log in / Register
			Text Size

Kucinich Predicts Health Care Will Pass by One Vote

Why Democrats Are Fighting for a Republican Health Plan

The Heircut

General Points Finger at Gays in Bosnian Massacre

'Daily Show': Progressives Are Out to Get Us All

Kucinich Predicts Health Care Will Pass by One Vote

Why Democrats Are Fighting for a Republican Health Plan
By E.J. Dionne

RFK and the Civil Rights Movement

The Terrifying World of Pakistan’s ‘Disappeared’
By Robert Fisk

Live Blogging the Health Care Vote

Seven Years Later

Tampons Go Where?

Global Recession Scars the Rich Nations

China Dries Up

Regulating Too Big to Fail

‘Left, Right & Center’: Deeming or Redeeming?; Health Care Gets Critical

Obama: ‘If This Vote Fails, the Insurance Industry Will Continue to Run Amok’

‘Daily Show’: Progressives Are Out to Get Us All

‘Colbert Report’: Census-Censoring With Bachmann and Beck

Perry Anderson on the Specter of China
By Perry Anderson

Study Says Fido’s Family Tree Has Arabian Roots

Conan O’Brien and Fox Still in Early Courtship Phase

Flynt Peeking Into Presidents’ Bedrooms for New Book

The Questions Education Reformers Aren’t Asking

Dig led by Mike Rose

Financial Meltdown 101

A Dig compiled by the editors of Truthdig

Restoring Prosperity: How Workers and Managers Are Forging a New Culture of Cooperation

By Wellford Wilms
$25.00

Gonzales: We May Prosecute Journalists

Posted on May 22, 2006

Atty. Gen. Alberto Gonzales says that the Bush White House may go after journalists who report on national security-related matters. “There are some statutes on the book which, if you read the language carefully, would seem to indicate that that is a possibility.”

Funny: There are lots of FISA statutes that you don’t have to read particularly carefully to learn that spying on Americans without warrants is illegal.

N.Y. Times:

The government has the legal authority to prosecute journalists for publishing classified information, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales said yesterday.

“There are some statutes on the book which, if you read the language carefully, would seem to indicate that that is a possibility,” Mr. Gonzales said on the ABC News program “This Week.”

“That’s a policy judgment by the Congress in passing that kind of legislation,” he continued. “We have an obligation to enforce those laws. We have an obligation to ensure that our national security is protected.”

Link

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

TAGS: alberto attorney gonzales journalis national prosecute reporter security wiretapping

Related Entries

March 17, 2010 The Truth About American and Israeli Interests Comes Out
March 16, 2010 Mega Media Edition
March 15, 2010 Spies Gone Wild: Afghanistan
March 15, 2010 Israel Crackdown Puts Liberal Jews on the Spot
March 12, 2010 The Difference Between a Terrorist and Someone Who Flies a Plane Into a Building

Email to a friend

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: Ted Koppel: Time for Army of U.S. Mercenaries?

Next item: Paul Krugman: A Bad Day for Joe Lieberman

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By William Day, May 23, 2006 at 2:57 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Its good to hear that our illustrious attorney general reads the law. Now one can only hope that while he is looking through the laws he comes up on the one in FISA. But, given his past history, he FIRST has to give his interpretation of what the law says, rather than exactly how it is written. I guess even lap dogs can even become the nation’s top law enforcer and we have to remember he gets his marching orders from the Decider.

Report this

By ejay, May 23, 2006 at 11:00 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Check more than the FISA statutes.

Gonzalez may not have a leg to stand on when it comes to prosecuting some journalists. It depends on the secret revealed in print.

Under current federal law, it’s illegal to classify something as secret merely because it is controversial.

Government officials have been abusing the law on that one for years. They just hide behind a top secret classification just to keep the government from looking bad.

Ask the question: How many journalists may face prosecution because they reported on secrets that were merely controversial. Who makes the determination about something improperly classified?

Report this