![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Gore for 2008?Posted on May 8, 2006
Favorable publicity surrounding Al Gore’s new global warming movie has contributed to the buzz that the former VP has his sights set on the White House in 2008. A former aide tells the WSJ that he’s been talking about it.
Previous item: Single and Fabulous Next item: Lesbians' Brains Respond Differently Than Straight Women's Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By steve, May 9, 2006 at 3:40 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
i have to laugh at the person who said that in 2000 he would have voted for nader because gore in 2000 stood for nothing, i cant count on 5 hands how many great things mr gore stands for and has always stood for, uninformed americans are the reason gore lost, in 2008 pay more attn. we have lost out on the best politician alive. mr. gore just may be too good to be am american president anyway, perhaps he is overqualified!!
Report thisBy Paul Murray, May 8, 2006 at 10:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
What a tragedy for the world that this man was not elected in 2000.
Report thisBy drew, May 8, 2006 at 2:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I was 17 in 2000, but I would have voted for Nader. In 08, I would certainly vote for Gore. Why?
Report thisBecause before, Gore didn’t stand for anything. Now he does.
By lincoln, May 8, 2006 at 11:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
No doubt there are many voters who now know they made the wrong choice in 2000, even among those still swallowing the neo-con koolaid 4 years later. At long last the Republican denial machine is self-destructing. Without hype or pretense Al Gore owns the global anthropogenic climate change issue. There are three more hurricane seasons between now and the so far still scheduled 2008 presidential election. All he has to do is keep his head down. All we have to do is make sure that there is actually an election.
Report this