|
|
May 23, 2013
|
|
Prosecutor Puts Bush in the SpotlightPosted on Apr 11, 2006Patrick Fitzgerald writes in a legal briefing, “It is hard to conceive of what evidence there could be that would disprove the existence of White House efforts to ‘punish Wilson.’ ”
Advertisement Previous item: Hundreds of Thousands Rally for Immigrant Rights Next item: Third Retired General Wants Rumsfeld Out New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By JSD, April 13, 2006 at 1:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
For you legal minds out there, how about this Greg Palast analysis of Bush’s legal jepardy:
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=490&row=0
Report thisBy J. Thomas Duffy, April 11, 2006 at 5:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
They’ve already begun the spin, that the leak was a “good leak” and that “he wanted to get the truth out” ...
We covered this the other day on The Garlic
Top Ten Cloves: Things White House Will Say To Claim President Didnt Leak Classified Information
http://puregarlic.blogspot.com/2006/04/top-ten-cloves-things-white-house-will.html
Peace
Report thisJTD