Did Scalia Prejudge Guantanamo Case?

Email    Print    Share x

RSS Feed
Digg
Facebook
TwitThis
StumbleUpon
Reddit
YahooBuzz
Email
BlinkList
del.icio.us
Fark
Furl
Google
LinkedIn
Mixx
MyShare
NewsVine
Propeller
SphereIt
Technorati
YahooMyWeb

Posted on Mar 27, 2006

From koce.org

Critics say that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (shown here during a reenactment of a landmark labor law case) should recuse himself from a case involving the rights of U.S.-held detainees in light of his skeptical public comments on the issue.

Newsweek surfaces unpublicized comments by the Supreme Court justice in which he scoffs at the idea of extending full legal rights to Guantanamo detainees. Problem is: He has yet to judge that case.

Newsweek:

April 3, 2006 issue - The Supreme Court this week will hear arguments in a big case: whether to allow the Bush administration to try Guantnamo detainees in special military tribunals with limited rights for the accused. But Justice Antonin Scalia has already spoken his mind about some of the issues in the matter. During an unpublicized March 8 talk at the University of Freiburg in Switzerland, Scalia dismissed the idea that the detainees have rights under the U.S. Constitution or international conventions, adding he was “astounded” at the “hypocritical” reaction in Europe to Gitmo. “War is war, and it has never been the case that when you captured a combatant you have to give them a jury trial in your civil courts,” he says on a tape of the talk reviewed by NEWSWEEK. “Give me a break.”

Link

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

TAGS: constitution courts detainees guantanamo justice rights scalia supreme court

Related Entries

• February 15, 2012 White House Isn’t Buying What Syria Is Selling
• February 10, 2012 The Right’s Boon in Knox v. SEIU
• February 10, 2012 Truthdigger of the Week: 9th Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt
• February 7, 2012 Appeals Court Declares Prop. 8 Unconstitutional
• January 23, 2012 Thank You for Standing Up

Email to a friend

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

.

Previous item: British Memo: Bush Was Set on War

Next item: Christian Afghan Freed, but Issue Remains

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Joe Citizen, March 27, 2006 at 4:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Not exactly the picture of judicial decorum, is he? What a boorish, ignorant man! According to a clip I saw on TV, he seems to think all the detainees at Gitmo were captured on the field of battle. Does he know anything at all about the real facts of the matter? Yet another embarrassment for the United States.

Report this

By Curtis Sommer, March 27, 2006 at 9:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This Supreme Court justice shows how small and narrow minded he really is. The continuous corrupted rulings, favoring the friends and cronies he chooses to surround himself with, in open and blazen,  moral, and legal conflicts of interest. The hobnobbing and vacation trip he took with Vice President Cheney prior to his ruling in favor of keeping the details of Dick Cheney’s Secret Energy Task Force meetings, out of the prying eyes of the American citizens. He warrants removal from office.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!

Name:

Email: (won't be displayed on the site)

Your Web Site:

Your Comment:

                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.