Top Leaderboard, Site wide
October 22, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Get Truthdig's headlines in your inbox!








Truthdig Bazaar
Daddy Goes to Work

Daddy Goes to Work

By Jabari Asim
$12.47

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Did Scalia Prejudge Guantanamo Case?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Mar 27, 2006
Antonin_Scalia
From koce.org

Critics say that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (shown here during a reenactment of a landmark labor law case) should recuse himself from a case involving the rights of U.S.-held detainees in light of his skeptical public comments on the issue.

Newsweek surfaces unpublicized comments by the Supreme Court justice in which he scoffs at the idea of extending full legal rights to Guantanamo detainees. Problem is: He has yet to judge that case.


Newsweek:

April 3, 2006 issue - The Supreme Court this week will hear arguments in a big case: whether to allow the Bush administration to try Guantnamo detainees in special military tribunals with limited rights for the accused. But Justice Antonin Scalia has already spoken his mind about some of the issues in the matter. During an unpublicized March 8 talk at the University of Freiburg in Switzerland, Scalia dismissed the idea that the detainees have rights under the U.S. Constitution or international conventions, adding he was “astounded” at the “hypocritical” reaction in Europe to Gitmo. “War is war, and it has never been the case that when you captured a combatant you have to give them a jury trial in your civil courts,” he says on a tape of the talk reviewed by NEWSWEEK. “Give me a break.”

Link

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Joe Citizen, March 27, 2006 at 5:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Not exactly the picture of judicial decorum, is he? What a boorish, ignorant man! According to a clip I saw on TV, he seems to think all the detainees at Gitmo were captured on the field of battle. Does he know anything at all about the real facts of the matter? Yet another embarrassment for the United States.

Report this

By Curtis Sommer, March 27, 2006 at 10:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This Supreme Court justice shows how small and narrow minded he really is. The continuous corrupted rulings, favoring the friends and cronies he chooses to surround himself with, in open and blazen,  moral, and legal conflicts of interest. The hobnobbing and vacation trip he took with Vice President Cheney prior to his ruling in favor of keeping the details of Dick Cheney’s Secret Energy Task Force meetings, out of the prying eyes of the American citizens. He warrants removal from office.

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.