Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Left Masthead
October 6, 2015
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Rad American Women A-Z

Truthdig Bazaar

Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention

By Manning Marable

more items

Ear to the Ground
Print this item

House Votes ‘No’ on Ports—‘Yes’ Is Likely on Star Wars

Posted on Mar 16, 2006

The House voted against an amendment on March 16 that would have funded port security and disaster preparedness—and it paved the way for passage of Bush’s budget, which contains a $1.7-billion increase for the Star Wars-esque missile defense program.

Truthdig says:

The House just voted down an amendment that would have provided $1.25 billion for port inspections and disaster preparedness. Meanwhile, as Think Progress points out, the Bush budget contains an increase of $1.7 billion for a Star Wars-esque missile defense program—which doesn’t even work.

May the Force be with us.

Think Progress:

Moments ago, the House of Representatives narrowly defeated an amendment proposed by Rep. Martin Sabo (D-MN) that would have provided $1.25 billion in desperately needed funding for port security and disaster preparedness. The Sabo amendment included:

- $300 million to enable U.S. customs agents to inspect high-risk containers at all 140 overseas ports that ship directly to the United States. Current funding only allows U.S. customs agents to operate at 43 of these ports.

- $400 million to place radiation monitors at all U.S. ports of entry. Currently, less than half of U.S. ports have radiation monitors.

- $300 million to provide backup emergency communications equipment for the Gulf Coast.

Meanwhile, the Bush budget - which most of the members who voted against this bill will likely support - contains an increase of $1.7 billion for missile defense, a program that doesn’t even work.

Full story

More Below the Ad


Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By felicity smith, March 17, 2006 at 1:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

House and Senate members vote for money in their campaign coffers, period.  I doubt they even read what they’re actually voting for. But you can bet they damn well know who it benefits.

Report this
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Like Truthdig on Facebook