LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 12, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

More About the Man Bankrolling Santorum

White Nationalists Share Spotlight With GOP at CPAC

A 'Queer History' of Rick Santorum and Proposition 8

Contraception and the Cost of Culture Wars

Single-Payer Contraception

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Political Divide

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Capitalism-vs.-Socialism Debate Erupts in China

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Mar 12, 2006

Amid China’s explosive market-driven growth over the past decade, it’s sometimes hard to remember that it is technically a communist country. A dispute over property rights has brought the issue to the fore.

Truthdig’s Orville Schell examined this schism here.

N.Y. Times:

BEIJING, March 11—For the first time in perhaps a decade, the National People’s Congress, the Communist Party-run legislature now convened in its annual two-week session, is consumed with an ideological debate over socialism and capitalism that many assumed had been buried by China’s long streak of fast economic growth.

The controversy has forced the government to shelve a draft law to protect property rights that had been expected to win pro forma passage and highlighted the resurgent influence of a small but vocal group of socialist-leaning scholars and policy advisers. These old-style leftist thinkers have used China’s rising income gap and increasing social unrest to raise doubts about what they see as the country’s headlong pursuit of private wealth and market-driven economic development.

The roots of the current debate can be traced to a biting critique of the property rights law that circulated on the Internet last summer. The critique’s author, Gong Xiantian, a professor at Beijing University Law School, accused the legal experts who wrote the draft of “copying capitalist civil law like slaves,” and offering equal protection to “a rich man’s car and a beggar man’s stick.” Most of all, he protested that the proposed law did not state that “socialist property is inviolable,” a once sacred legal concept in China.

Full story

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.