LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 28, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

India May Hold the Whip Hand in Dubai Power Game

Fred Branfman on 'The Making of an Elder Culture'

Understanding Our Hollow 'Centrists'

Obama's Thankless Thanksgiving

Purloined E-Mails Don't Change the Facts

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
America and the Islamic Bomb: The Deadly Compromise

America and the Islamic Bomb: The Deadly Compromise

By David Armstrong and Joseph J. Trento
$16.47

Judgment in Paris book cover

The Judgment of Paris

by Gore Vidal
Very Fine, Collector's Copy $600 NOW $300

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Libby’s Defense: The Dog Ate My Memory

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Mar 1, 2006

MSNBC: Scooter Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff, has hired a renowned memory-loss expert to assist him with his legal defense. Harvard psychology professor Daniel L. Schacter tells NBC News he has been retained by Libby as a consultant. An official familiar with the Libby defense team confirms the news.

Schacter, who has been at Harvard since 1991 and who has a 29-page resume, is the author of “The Seven Sins of Memory” and “Searching for Memory: The Brain, the Mind and the Past.” His books offer explanations for the “vulnerability of memory.” Schacter writes that if we are distracted as an event unfolds, “we may later have great difficulty remembering the details of what happened.” Time, of course, often weakens our memory. And, he writes, it is easy to “unwittingly create mistaken—though strongly held—beliefs about the past.”

Libby’s lawyers hinted in court filings last week that memory loss will be “central themes” of Libby’s defense. Libby’s lawyers write: “...any misstatements he made during his FBI interviews or grand jury testimony were not intentional, but rather the result of confusion, mistake or faulty memory.”

Full story

The National Review has a great follow-up on this.

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.