LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 17, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

The Imperial Way: American Decline in Perspective, Part 2

'Losing' the World: American Decline in Perspective, Part 1

Apple's China Comes Home to Haunt Us

What's Really at Stake in 2012

Whither 'Colbert Report'?

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Comes the Revolution
 * NEW! * Pay Close Attention to China

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar

Our Daily Bread

By Lauren B. Davis

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

U.S. Troops: Pull Out of Iraq

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Feb 28, 2006

FT.com (Financial Times): Most American troops in Iraq believe that the US should withdraw within the next year, according to the first poll of US military personnel in Iraq.

President George W. Bush, whose overall approval rating fell to a new low of 34 per cent this week, has repeatedly said the US would finish the mission in Iraq. But a Zogby International/Le Moyne College poll found that only 23 per cent of US troops believed that they should stay “as long as they are needed”.

Full story

Truthdig wonders: Does this mean that Bush is unpatriotic because he’s not “supporting the troops”?

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Donald in East Rutherford, NJ, March 1, 2006 at 3:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Note when reading the Financial Times article, a Bush apologist says the poll is wrong because more than 100% of troops who have fulfilled their commitment re-enlist. 

Now, never mind that re-enlistment is coerced:  we will “stop-loss” you and keep you here anyway, or you can re-enlist and be paid a re-enlistment bonus.  It’s obvious that the ONLY reason the DoD bothers to pay re-enlistment bonuses is for PR purposes. 

But what do they mean “more than 100%”?  These guys can’t even lie straight.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.