LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Exclusive Truthdig Gifts! Mr. Fish Signed Prints and T-shirts - Gore Vidal Signed First Editions
December 1, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read
Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Addicted to Nonsense

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Three Plays book cover

Three Plays

by Gore Vidal
Very Fine, Collector's Copy $350 NOW $150

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Withdrawal From Iraq? Not With All These Shiny U.S. Bases…

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Feb 24, 2006

TomDispatch.com:

We’re in a new period in the war in Iraq—one that brings to mind the Nixonian era of “Vietnamization”: A President presiding over an increasingly unpopular war that won’t end; an election bearing down; the need to placate a restive American public; and an army under so much strain that it seems to be running off the rails. So it’s not surprising that the media is now reporting on administration plans for, or “speculation” about, or “signs of,” or “hints” of “major draw-downs” or withdrawals of American troops. The figure regularly cited these days is less than 100,000 troops in Iraq by the end of 2006. With about 136,000 American troops there now, that figure would represent just over one-quarter of all in-country U.S. forces, which means, of course, that the term “major” certainly rests in the eye of the beholder.

In addition, these withdrawals are—we know this thanks to a Seymour Hersh piece, Up in the Air, in the December 5th New Yorker—to be accompanied, as in South Vietnam in the Nixon era, by an unleashing of the U.S. Air Force. The added air power is meant to compensate for any lost punch on the ground (and will undoubtedly lead to more “collateral damage”—that is, Iraqi deaths).

Full story

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By refusedig, February 25, 2006 at 8:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

There are already big oil contracts in place for control of Iraqi oil, I would assume including oil companies other than U.S. Now that we (and, by extension, the rest of the oil-hungry world) are there, neither Republicans nor Democrats will let us leave—not until our civilization no longer needs oil. If the American people want us out, their political recourse, sad to say, will have to come from outside the mainstream of U.S. political action.

The rest of the world is content to let Americans bleed and die for it, and the various U.S.  corporatist propaganda machines are working non-stop to make enough of the American people feel OK about it that we can stay in Iraq.

Maybe they are wrong. Maybe the American people will force a withdrawal, but it is a gamble that Corporate America (which includes the U.S. Government), I am sure, feel forced to take.

Report this

By spiiderweb, February 25, 2006 at 12:24 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I blogged this back on the 15th. It was particulary upsetting that reporters know they can’t submit a story including any combination of the words “permanent”, “bases” and “iraq”.

http://spiiderweb.blogspot.com/2006/02/permantent-bases-in-iraq.html

Its very clear we’re not going to leave Iraq.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.