![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Bush & Co. Pushing Abstinence on AdultsPosted on Oct 31, 2006
The federal government is expanding the scope of its abstinence programs to people up to age 29—proving yet again that the federal government takes its marching orders from Christian evangelicals who believe that Jesus is offended by premarital sex. (h/t: Huff Po)
Previous item: Not So Straight Talk Next item: French Students Turning to Sex Work? Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Leslie, November 2, 2006 at 12:44 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
This guy is an egomaniac. I can’t wait until the Bush family fades into the sunset and is never heard from again. People that need to worry about others sex life are usually frustrated sexually. You’ve done enough dammage to this country. Leave our sex lives alone..
Report thisBy Jana, November 1, 2006 at 11:31 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
This is the same guy who talks about ‘putting food on your families’ and how people and fish can co-exist! Does this guy have ANYTHING between his ears? This man already runs our soldier’s lives, and now he’s trying to run the rest of our lives, too.
Report thisBy GW=MCHammered, November 1, 2006 at 10:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m with the GOP on this one:
And I blame Clinton too… Hillary Clinton. If she weren’t more machismo than all men rolled into one, Bill would not have been launched toward chunky chicks under the age of twenty-nine. According to a Republican official at NASA, Hillary is a potent cocktail of politico black hole and neoliberal uranus. A hermaphroditic, planetary flip-flopping, sexual crooner that an abstinence-only gay predator could love. That’s why I’m writing in that neocon uber-mensch with all the lover-man moves, Foley for President in 2008. Because we Virilicrats can’t risk having as Chief Executive someone with a bigger political thruster than ours… especially when that chief is a chick!
Yahweh bless Americana, brutha.
(the previous message was for entertainment purposes only - no insult intended to any existing or non-existing person, sexual preference, alien race, deity, news agency, body part, or Disney character)
Report thisBy Rhonda, November 1, 2006 at 10:03 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Is it just me, or does Dear Leader’s resemblence to an Islamo-fascist get stronger every day?
Report thisBy Lillian, November 1, 2006 at 7:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
It was the George & Barbara Bush who should have abstained.
Report thisBy mickeyjay31, October 31, 2006 at 3:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Well, I have to say this comes as no surprise. Of course, GW doesn’t want people to have sex before marriage. In fact, rumor has it, he wants to outlaw it all together. I’m sure wife, Laura, will be his strongest backer. Who the hell wants a drunk toad, crawling all over you while reciting the 23 Paslm and promising not to tell Donald Rumsfeld. Ah, come on. Does this not set a pattern? He doesn’t want gays having sex because he’s afraid it will begat more gays. Of course, if Hispanics engage in sex, all those little ones will be scurring under the 700 mile fence he wants to erect. And speaking of erections, America’s been riding this Right Winged screwing long enough! What we do with our sex life and when we do it is nobody’s business--married, single, straight, or gay. George, go home and try and get you some before she heads for the hills and you’ll have to do it yourself.
Report thisBy yours truly, October 31, 2006 at 2:48 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Next he’ll be checking on who’s having wet dreams. The first thing there’’ll be this questionaire everyone has to fill out. Then when the answer he gets invaribaly is “Of course I don’t!’), Bush will be forced to decide who among us will be asked to agree to submit to the latest scientific test that determines whether or not one is guilty as charged. And then knowing that the penalty fits the crime
That’s the bad news. The good news is that there is a way out for us, which is that Tuesday next we change the world. We win, that’ll be the start. The follow-up? That’s up to us. .
Report thisBy Kate, October 31, 2006 at 1:10 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Seriously? I think we need to get into the habit of questioning everything
Report thisBy Maricia, October 31, 2006 at 11:40 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
What a joke!!! Ain’t never going to happen!!! Maybe the gals should wear BURKAS!! Or perhaps people should cast stones!!
Report this