Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 20, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

Sen. Elizabeth Warren's Supreme Court Warning

Quelle Surprise! Haiti on the Mend

Warren Opposes Obama Nominee, Lawmaker Urges Gender-Role Class for Kids, and More

How American University Got Involved in Israel's Public Interest

Most Comments
Most Emailed




The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Another Hawk Sees the Light

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Oct 7, 2006

As the midterm election looms, the White House is scrambling to respond to comments made by Sen. John Warner, a Bush supporter and chairman of the Armed Services Committee, who said the situation in Iraq is “drifting sideways.”


New York Times:

Speaking to reporters on Thursday after returning from a trip that included a one-day stop in Baghdad, Mr. Warner said the United States should consider “a change of course” if the violence there did not diminish soon. He did not specify what shift might be necessary, but said that the American military had done what it could to stabilize Iraq and that no policy options should be taken “off the table.”


With the blessing of the White House, a high-level commission led by James A. Baker III, the former secretary of state, is already reviewing American policy in Iraq. But the commission is not scheduled to report to Mr. Bush and Congress until after the November elections, a timeline that the White House had hoped would enable Mr. Bush to avoid public discussion of any change of course until after voters determine which party will control Congress next year.


Now, Mr. Warner’s comments are pushing up that timeline, forcing Republicans to confront the issue before some are ready. In an interview on Friday, Senator Susan Collins, a Maine Republican who has been critical of the administration’s approach in the past, said there was a “growing sense of unease” among other Republicans, which she said could deepen because of Senator Warner’s comments.

Link

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Mad As Hell, October 8, 2006 at 6:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

So, first Warner, McCain and Graham stand up to Bush and torture and look like heros.

Then W,M, and G get mollification language but cave in to Mad King George on everything meaningful.

Now Warner is posing as a stand-up guy again, opposing the MKG’s policies.  He reminds me of Arlen Spector—lots of strong independent statements but never backs them up with his votes.

Even the best GOP representatives stink. Only Lincoln Chafee in the GOP had that guts to oppose our rights being taken.

12 Dem Sens stink even worse—they COULD have blocked it.  But we are stuck with them if we want a majority in the Senate to oppose MKG’s fascist legislation.

Report this

By Zena, October 7, 2006 at 10:29 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

GET OUT OF IRAQ, OR FACE IMPEACHMENT MR. BUSH!

Report this

By Jon B, October 7, 2006 at 9:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Bush 41 elected not to invade and occupy Iraq because of anticipated consequences. Bush 43 knew how to invade but didn’t anticipate the consequences plus international condemnation.

What good is the lone superpower when the superpower can’t even manage a small country named Iraq?

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.