LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 22, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Lock Up Washington

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

California Man Sues Officers He Says Nearly Beat Him to Death

The Promise of a Courageous Al-Jazeera America May Be Fading

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Lock Up Washington
Too Soon to Tell: The Case for Hope, Continued
Warming Climate Endangers U.K. Farming

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The Virgin of Flames

The Virgin of Flames

By Chris Abani
$11.20

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Military Hones New Counterinsurgency Strategy

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Oct 5, 2006

Pinch yourself. This is actual good news about the U.S. military in Iraq: The Army and Marines are finishing work on a new doctrine that puts the welfare and protection of civilians front and center, while minimizing the use of force.


N.Y. Times:

The United States Army and Marines are finishing work on a new counterinsurgency doctrine that draws on the hard-learned lessons from Iraq and makes the welfare and protection of civilians a bedrock element of military strategy.

The doctrine warns against some of the practices used early in the war, when the military operated without an effective counterinsurgency playbook. It cautions against overly aggressive raids and mistreatment of detainees. Instead it emphasizes the importance of safeguarding civilians and restoring essential services, and the rapid development of local security forces.

The current military leadership in Iraq has already embraced many of the ideas in the doctrine. But some military experts question whether the Army and the Marines have sufficient troops to carry out the doctrine effectively while also preparing for other threats.

Link

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By anonymous, October 6, 2006 at 6:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

That is the classical definition of “too little, too late”!

I’m betting that all this was in the original plan & that Rumdum’s been arguing against it for 4 years.

Report this

By OCPatriot, October 5, 2006 at 7:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This is actually good news.  My guess is the military has come up with this on their own, not with the help of a Cheney or a Rumsfeld.  Please understand, based on my experience, that many top military men and the military schools are generally quite smart, quite apolitical, and very practical.  I wrote some time ago:

Asking the military, who weren’t trained to build nations and who did their job heroically in the war, to sort out what needs to be done in Iraq or Afghanistan is truly amateurish; such work was never the military’s job.  Not even having a full professional cadre of those who speak the language of our enemies, from Afghanistan to Iraq to Iran to Lebanon – how could this administration even pretend to understand what forces it has unleashed?  The author of “Fiasco”, Tom Ricks, has said we’ll probably have troops in Iraq for fifteen years because of how amateurishly things have been handled.  I grieve for our sons and daughters and our grandchildren who will be forced to handle the mess that will be left behind by this administration.

The only thing that concerns me is the fact that it will take a good time to re-train our military, and they will be stuck there in Afghanistan and Iraq for a long time with a dual role.  The other thing is that such a re-training cannot be the primary mission of the military, which is to do a very difficult job that often involves killing and is messy and not constructive.  So there’s a contradiction here.

But please, understand that it is a positive step.  The job that Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush didn’t understand was (a) nation building, (b) fighting an insurgency, (c) fighting a civil war, (d) dealing with guerillas who wore the same clothing as the populace and lived in their apartments and homes.

Don’t make fun or denigrate the military.  They deserve our heartfelt thanks.  They perform like heroes and have done all we’ve asked of them.

Report this

By kevin99999, October 5, 2006 at 5:07 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“The Army and Marines are finishing work on a new doctrine that puts the welfare and protection of civilians front and center…”

Yeah, right. Is anyone buying it?

Report this

By Geronimo, October 5, 2006 at 4:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

So now it’s the nice cop routine, huh.  Alas, the Pentagon just doesn’t get it. - That people don’t like foreigners coming in and taking over their native land and that the only thing that’ll stop the killing is troops out now.  How to make it happen?  We win the November election, that’s how. 
  .  .

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.