LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 19, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Krugman to Playboy: Economic Crisis 'Doesn't Have to Be Happening'

Déjà Pooh

The .0000063% Election

Truthdigger of the Week: Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis

The Best, Most Revealing Reporting on the Foreclosure Crisis

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * The Lowdown on Fracking
 * NEW! * The .0000063% Election

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Déjà Pooh

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

1 in 7 Americans Went Hungry in 2008

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Nov 16, 2009
Flickr / Rachel Zack

That recession is over statement looks more unfortunate every day. The Department of Agriculture disclosed Monday that a little more than 49 million Americans had trouble putting food on the table last year—the highest percentage since the government began keeping track in 1995, up 13 million people from the previous year.

Food insecurity was a problem before the economic meltdown, and things have obviously gotten worse. Sasha Abramsky, author of “Breadline USA,” has done tremendous work on the subject. Listen to a discussion about it here—PZS

Reuters via Yahoo:

More than 49 million Americans—one in seven—struggled to get enough to eat in 2008, the highest total in 14 years of a federal survey on “food insecurity,” the U.S. government said Monday.

While Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said programs such as food stamps softened the impact of an economic recession, anti-hunger groups pointed to the huge increase from the preceding year when 36.2 million people had trouble getting enough food and a third of them occasionally went hungry.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

TAGS:



Related Entries

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

.

Previous item: Uninsured Twice as Likely to Die in ER

Next item: Senate Liberals to Majority Leader: No More Compromise



Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By KDelphi, November 19, 2009 at 4:45 pm Link to this comment

paterick..we already do.
adam—Blighted urban areas do NOT have mega-stores with beans or produce. Beans are not a complete protein unless mixed with a starch.

When the govt stop subdsidizing corn (for fat cows and corn syrup) and making schools pay for everything by making a deal with Pepsi, and urban areas have more than liquor stores, maybe i’ll listen. Until then, youre just insensitive. If you were “smart with your budget” you wouldnt live in the US. If I had the money, Id be long gone.

Report this

By paterick, November 18, 2009 at 11:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

poor people always make everything look so bad, don’t we have private prisons to send them to. . .

Report this

By eggroll, November 18, 2009 at 12:22 am Link to this comment

Of course, Americans are hungry. Bifurcation of US
society into coexisting first- and third-world
populations has been underway for three decades. We
have a Gini coefficient of .47 for God’s sake! If we
look at the global population of 6.8 billion, about a
billion are suffering dire hunger, while some 3 billion
are moving up to better nutrition, or at least more
energy and land-and-water-intense foods such as farmed
meat. One in seven hungry? I’d say national inattention
to the issue of food insecurity pretty much matches the
international norm of blithe indifference.

Report this

By Bob Gibson, November 17, 2009 at 1:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

We are on the verge of another Great Depression. What we need is the policies similar to those of FDR to put Americans back to work. Check out newdeal20.org if interested to follow a series named “Navigating the Jobs Crisis” in which experts weigh in and give policy advice on how we can end unemployment and stimulate our economy through job creation.

http://www.newdeal20.org/?cat=942

Report this

By adam, November 17, 2009 at 12:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

People are not going hungry due to thier economic situation.  They are going hungry because of thier stupidity.  Have any of you ever been to a grocery store?  Dry beans cost less than $1 per pound.  Beans are also one of the best foods on the planet.  Not only do you spend less money, but you also become healthier.


On a seperate note, how much money have these “hungry” people spent on items such as booze, cigarettes, and other discretionary items?


Also, what is the call to action of this “news”?  Is it to prompt the government to offer more food stamps, or similar programs, to these people?  If that is the case, these people will continue to spend thier money on discretionary items instead of necessities.  This is the problem with social programs offered by the government.  It creates an incentive to spend money irresponsibly.


I am struggling myself, but I do not go hungry because I am responsible with my budget.

Report this

By FRTothus, November 17, 2009 at 12:37 pm Link to this comment

“24.9 percent of American children live in poverty, while the proportions in Germany, France and Italy are 8.6, 7.4 and 10.5 percent. And once born on the wrong side of the tracks, Americans are more likely to stay there than their counterparts in Europe. Those born to better-off families are more likely to stay better off. America is developing an aristocracy of the rich and a serfdom of the poor - the inevitable result of a twenty-year erosion of its social contract.”
(Will Hutton)

“Cuba has ... been condemned for not allowing its people to flee the island. That so many want to leave Cuba is treated as proof that Cuban socialism is a harshly repressive system, rather than that the U.S. embargo has made life difficult in Cuba. That so many millions more want to leave capitalist countries like Mexico, Nigeria, Poland, El Salvador, Philippines, South Korea, Macedonia, and others too numerous to list is never treated as grounds for questioning the free-market system that inflicts such misery.”
(Michael Parenti)

“America’s punitive and reactive response to crime is an integral part of the new social Darwinism, the criminal justice counterpart of an increasingly harsh attack on living standards and social supports, especially for the poor ... America [is] a society in which a permanent state of social disintegration is held in check only by the creation of a swollen apparatus of confinement and control that has no counterpart in our own history or in any other industrial democracy.”
(Elliott Currie)

“Those in power are blind devotees to private enterprise. They accept that degree of socialism implicit in the vast subsidies to the military-industrial-complex, but not that type of socialism which maintains public projects for the disemployed and the unemployed alike.”
(William O. Douglas, former U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1969)

Poor people living in third-world countries are not the only victims of the so-called new world order. At the heart of this “new” order is a troubling paradox: Poor people within the United States, and the country as a whole, are getting poorer at the same time as the rich within the United States are getting richer.”
(Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer)

... “the United States is slipping into a category of countries - among them Brazil, Britain, and Guatemala - where the gap [between rich and poor] is the worst around the globe.”
(United Nations’ Human Development Report)

“When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint.  When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.”
(Archbishop Helder Camara, Brazilian liberation theologist)

Report this

By steve, November 17, 2009 at 11:40 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“Let them eat cake” as our good friends in Washington will tell us.  I say we need to :::  START THE REVOLUTION!!!!  START THE REVOLUTION!!!!  START THE REVOLUTION NOW!!!

Report this

By Trapper Carrick, November 17, 2009 at 8:18 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Oh, it’s like healthcare coverage, many of the 49 million could afford it; they just chose not to eat, right?  Right, right Republicans and Republicrats.
Add to this stat the steep rise in obesity rates.  It kind of reminds you of our economic system: the top become rich over risky, and fraudulent schemes and the bottom just fails to participate.

Report this
LostHills's avatar

By LostHills, November 16, 2009 at 11:00 pm Link to this comment

They don’t even know how bad it really is, and if they did they wouldn’t say.

Report this

By KDelphi, November 16, 2009 at 10:13 pm Link to this comment

Further in the article:“The survey suggested that things could be much worse but for the fact that we have extensive food assistance programs,” Vilsack told reporters. “This is a great opportunity to put a spotlight on this problem.”

What an asshole…yeah, its “great” Vilsack…

Report this

By gerard, November 16, 2009 at 8:43 pm Link to this comment

What a disgrace, in view of the recent colossal Wall Street bailouts and bonuses!  With that, plus the torture scandals, the money-and-life-gobbling wars, murders, rapes, suicides, a continuing taste for capital punishment and the dimwitted fight over universal health care, Americans must look like a bunch of self-destructive idiots escaped from a nut factory!

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.