|
|
June 19, 2013
|
|
10 Americans Charged With Abduction in HaitiPosted on Feb 4, 2010Disasters evoke a whole range of human qualities, from the charitable to the predatory and beyond. Thus it’s not surprising, although it is upsetting, that a group of Americans was charged Thursday with abduction and criminal association after attempting to usher 33 Haitian children to an orphanage in the Dominican Republic last week even though many were not actually orphans. That, however, was only one of many problematic components of this case. —KA
Advertisement Previous item: Google Calls the Dreaded NSA for Tech Support Next item: Make It Three: Prius Brakes Could Spark Another Toyota Recall New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By FRTothus, February 6, 2010 at 11:15 am Link to this comment
How long will we have to wait before we see the US send in the Marines (again) to “bust them out”, and perhaps impose martial law for spell or ‘regime change’ (if history is any guide) until the natives understand who the boss is? After all, America and Americans obey no law other than the one they make up as they go, which is well-known by everyone other than the empire’s subjects.
If the USA (Inc.) couldn’t bully the International Aid Organizations, make sure that its politically-contributing American (mostly) firms and favored allies could profit ($ and PR) from American public largesse by a Congress that is well-schooled in the art of bribery and coercion, the USA (Inc.) wouldn’t be there in the first place. As Michael Parenti has pointed out, capitalist countries do not go to poor countries to make money. It’s the people that are poor. The countries are rich. They are rich in resources, and cheap labor, and provide the opportunity for numerous ‘schemes’ which can be put in place and “tried out”. All this behind a toxic and discredited narritive of old-fashioned 19th Century Colonialism with a good dose of poisonous Noblesse Oblige.
Note: Thank you, John Ellis, for pointing up the flaw in this nonsense:
[...continually giving birth to children that you know you will never be able to support; then watching them suffer terribly from malnutrition, extreme poverty, lack of medical care etc. etc. That is the real abuse that occurs continually in Haiti, in Africa and in many areas of Asia. The real solution to child abuse- it’s called birth-control.]
Arguments such as this that blame the victims for their lot confuses cause and effect, but does serve and soothe the imperial conscience.
Two salient facts of direct refutation:
Fact One: The more prosperous among us have smaller families.
Fact Two: For the Poor, children are an insurance policy, ie, the poor have many children so that hopefully they have enough survive as future family farm/work hands and some kind of old-age security for themselves later.
Conclusion: The best way to reduce world population is to eliminate poverty.
There’s a problem here, of course, in that the top one-tenth (and their boosters) need the poor to scare the middle-class to keep paying rents, and (at least as importantly, in that wealth itself is meaningless without poverty) need the poor and working class to be classes distinct from themselves, a devil they can point to and feel clean of their own ‘sins’ by comparison.
If Haitian missionaries had come to New Orleans after Katrina and took away little poor white babies, would they be immune from breaking US law?
Report thisBy altara, February 5, 2010 at 2:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
AITI RELIEF GIVING
I’m all for giving to help relief efforts in Haiti, but have a complaint about some of the appeals. For example, the text message that automatically sends $10 to the Red Cross. Nothing wrong with that, but I would like to know that other charities had the opportunity to do the same, particularly if these are advertised as a free public service announcements.
Also, much as I admire Michele Obama, I think that it is wrong for her to promote giving to the Red Cross, to the exclusion of other relief organizations. I have nothing against the Red Cross, but why not have her ask for funds to be divided among the Red Cross, Salvation Army, UNICEF, and perhaps one or two others.
homer http://www.altara.blogspot.com
Report thisBy Rodney, February 5, 2010 at 10:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
We as Americans believe that we can go into any Country we like and do whatever we like. That is why they hate us. Those Idaho Baptists went into Haiti and took children without the government’s permission.Let some Haitians come into America and try to leave with a bunch of white children and let’s see how far they get. It’s the same in Iraq where we lied about weapons to settle a old score and to steal oil. We force our Religion on others and act if it is okay. It is one thing to help the poor and needy. It is another thing to control to poor and needy
Report thisBy elwoodpdowd, February 5, 2010 at 6:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Guess what? The real abuse that no one ever talks about is continually giving birth to children that you know you will never be able to support; then watching them suffer terribly from malnutrition, extreme poverty, lack of medical care etc. etc. That is the real abuse that occurs continually in Haiti, in Africa and in many areas of Asia. The real solution to child abuse- it’s called birth-control.
Report thisBy yours truly, February 4, 2010 at 8:33 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The whole adventure smacks of what the European occupiers of the Americas did to the natives here (those who survived measles snd small pox epidemics, that is), because after stealing their land, shooting any natives who resisted (and then some), the Europeans would kidnap the native children, isolate them from their communities, forbid them to speak their native tongues and otherwise deculturate them. The operative premise for all these genocidal acts was that the native culture was inferior to the European’s. And now we have the same thing happening in Haiti, only this time the culprits are twenty Idaho Baptists whose aim is the forced conversion of Haiti’s children. And for this throwback to the days of a colonial yesteryear, Haitian authorities should impose a penalty that’ll teach these kidnappers a lesson, something like a fine that’s large enough to establish and maintain an orphanage in Port-au-Prince for, say, seventy-five children, one which features a curriculum that emphasizes Haiti’s indigenous culture, including Vodou. In addition members of this Idaho church should be deported from Haiti, as should all other so-called missionaries out to make forced conversions. And if, indeed, Jesus told these Idaho Baptist to kidnap these children (as they claim), he should be tried in absentia, convicted and forever banished from Haiti. What the heck, even if he is the lord, there has to be a certain standard of decency that’s applicable to divine as well as to human beings?
Report this