Send to a Colleague

Colleague's Email: (use commas for multiple emails)

Your Name:

Your Email:

Message (you can change this if you'd like):
<IMG src="http://www.truthdig.com/images/masthead_newsletter.gif"><p> Hi, <p> I read this on Truthdig and thought you would find it interesting. <p> =-=-=-=-=-=-=<br> Court Ruling May Cancel Bush’s ‘Blank Check’ for Terror War <p>Specifically, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060629/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_guantanamo_trials&printer=1;_ylt=An.UVJ91BbBywb28my_CKc9Aw_IE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MXN1bHE0BHNlYwN0bWE-" title="today's Supreme Court ruling">today’s Supreme Court ruling</a> held that the president overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees. <li>But more important, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/29/gitmo-wiretapping/" title="Think Progress interprets the ruling">Think Progress interprets the ruling</a> to mean that “the Authorization for the Use of Military Force—issued by Congress in the days after 9/11—is not a blank check for the administration.”</li> <li>Also, <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2006/06/hamdan_summary.html" title="SCOTUSblog interprets this ruling">SCOTUSblog says the ruling means</a> that the Geneva Convention <i>does</i> apply to the conflict with Al Qaeda, and consequently “this almost certainly means that the CIA’s interrogation tactics of waterboarding and hypothermia (and others) violate the War Crimes Act.”</li> </p> <p><a href="http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060629_supreme_court_tribunals/">http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060629_supreme_court_tribunals/</a> <p> Copyright © 2006 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.<br> =-=-=-=-=-=-=<br> This is a one-time mailing from Truthdig, (<a href="http://www.truthdig.com/">www.truthdig.com</a>) on behalf of the sender.<br> Please report any misuse to webmaster-at-truthdig.com <IMG src="http://www.truthdig.com/images/masthead_newsletter.gif"><p> Hi, <p>I read this on Truthdig and thought you would find it interesting. <p> =-=-=-=-=-=-=<br> Court Ruling May Cancel Bush’s ‘Blank Check’ for Terror War <p>Specifically, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060629/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_guantanamo_trials&printer=1;_ylt=An.UVJ91BbBywb28my_CKc9Aw_IE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MXN1bHE0BHNlYwN0bWE-" title="today's Supreme Court ruling">today’s Supreme Court ruling</a> held that the president overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees. <li>But more important, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/29/gitmo-wiretapping/" title="Think Progress interprets the ruling">Think Progress interprets the ruling</a> to mean that “the Authorization for the Use of Military Force—issued by Congress in the days after 9/11—is not a blank check for the administration.”</li> <li>Also, <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2006/06/hamdan_summary.html" title="SCOTUSblog interprets this ruling">SCOTUSblog says the ruling means</a> that the Geneva Convention <i>does</i> apply to the conflict with Al Qaeda, and consequently “this almost certainly means that the CIA’s interrogation tactics of waterboarding and hypothermia (and others) violate the War Crimes Act.”</li> </p> <p><a href="http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060629_supreme_court_tribunals/">http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060629_supreme_court_tribunals/</a> <p> Copyright © 2006 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.<br> =-=-=-=-=-=-=<br> This is a one-time mailing from Truthdig, (<a href="http://www.truthdig.com/">www.truthdig.com</a>) on behalf of the sender.<br> Please report any misuse to webmaster-at-truthdig.com