LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Holiday Scheer! Exclusive Truthdig Gifts for the Holidays
 
December 2, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

DIG DIRECTOR

Nir Rosen
Nir Rosen is a fellow at the New America Foundation and a free-lance writer. His book on postwar Iraq, "In the Belly of the Green Bird: The Triumph of the Martyrs in Iraq" was published by Free Press in May 2006.

His articles from Iraq and elsewhere are available on www.nirrosen.com.








 
 

The Many Faces of Abu Musab al Zarqawi

(Page 4)

On Sept. 11, 2004, Zarqawi addressed the Muslim nation, again lamenting the fact that it was sleeping instead of supporting the jihad in Iraq. The once proud Muslims were now downtrodden. They fought back with neither the sword nor the pen. Jihad had been declared and the gates of heaven were open. If the men were not willing to fight then they should let their women take up arms and the men should take up cooking.

Perhaps realizing that his edicts alone weren’t sufficiently rallying supporters to his cause, Zarqawi next reached out to someone he had previously opposed and kept at a distance: Bin Laden. The two had operated independently in Afghanistan, and they certainly had not collaborated in Iraq, but Zarqawi apparently realized he could benefit from the prestige associated with the Al Qaeda brand in global jihadi circles. So in December 2004 Zarqawi swore an oath of allegiance to Bin Laden and renamed his organization Al Qaeda in Iraq. He also joined the Salafiya al Mujahedia, or Salafi Mujahedin, movement in Iraq. Bin Laden soon afterward announced that Zarqawi was the head of Al Qaeda’s operations in Iraq. 

This partnership had obvious benefits for Bin Laden, and for his deputy, Ayman al Zawahiri, as well. Hiding somewhere in the mountains of Pakistan, the Al Qaeda leadership was not engaged in the jihad—and certainly not in its most important front, Iraq, where most of the fighting against America was taking place. When Zarqawi took on the Al Qaeda brand name, he allowed Bin Ladin and Zawahiri’s defunct organization to gain new life, and he granted the previous generation of jihadis the prestige associated with the jihad in Iraq.

After Zarqawi renamed his organization Al Qaeda in Iraq, its ideology was elaborated by a man called Abu Maysara, which was probably the assumed identity of a longtime collaborator named Maysara al Ghareeb. Abu Maysara explained that their goals included: a renewal of “true” monotheism, purifying it from elements of polytheism; jihad for Allah’s sake; re-conquering Muslim lands from infidels and apostates so that Allah’s laws could be applied; the spread of Islam in lands where it does not yet exist; freeing Muslim prisoners; helping Muslims everywhere; and reestablishing the Islamic caliphate so that Muslims would be ruled by Muslims.



On Dec. 9, 2004, a Zarqawi-run committee issued a statement about the upcoming elections in Iraq. Addressing “all the parties participating in the elections,” it threatened Shias around the world for supporting the Crusader occupation of Iraq. It called Ayatollah Ali Sistani the greatest collaborator with the Crusaders. It condemned the apostate police, the national guardsmen and the army for attacking Falluja. It warned the rejectionist Shias and their political parties, the Kurdish peshmerha, the Christians and the hypocrites such as the Islamic party that the Tawhid movement would increase attacks on them. It was signed by Abu said al Islambuli.

In January 2005, while covering the Iraqi election campaign, I found leaflets warning Iraqis not to vote. Signed by the military wing of Ansar al Sunna, the leaflets read:

“There is no doubt that Allah created his creatures so that they worship him and not polytheism, and he helps all the people on the path to success, and it is God’s work that among his servants there are Muslims and non-Muslims and there is a continuing war between these two until judgment day. And now America, the leader of the modern infidels, has started to bare hatred against Islam and the Muslims. This war will not stop, even if the occupation ends, because it is not a matter of occupation but of creating an Islamic state. As we have announced before, this is our legal verdict about participation in the elections that will take place in Iraq. We warn you against this participation because the polling stations and the people that work in them are a target for the brave soldiers of Allah, so we advise everybody to keep away from any military target, whether it is the crusader American headquarters or their patrols or the Iraqi National Guard or the apostate police forces. Because of the continuation of the battle between us and the crusaders and to avoid harming people, we announce a curfew for three days.”

The leaflet was unique for having provided a theological worldview--and a Manichaean one at that.

Though Al Qaeda under Bin Laden and Zawahiri had not made Shias their targets and did not publicly condemn them, Zarqawi held that Shias were the most evil of mankind. It is possible that he learned his hatred of Shias in Pakistan, where Shias are regularly murdered in sectarian killings. Zarqawi compared Shias to snakes, scorpions and enemy spies. His hatred could be traced to the ideology of the 13th century cleric Ibn Taimiya, the father of Wahabism and Salafism. Shias were polytheists who worshipped at graves and shrines. Shias were to be avoided at all costs. They could not be married, they could not bear witness and animals they slaughtered could not be eaten. In this way Zarqawi defended operations that caused Muslims to die. Martyrdom operations, as he called suicide bombers, were sanctified because defending Islam was even more important than defending the lives of Muslims.


Next Page: Zarqawi’s actions had for some time been proving too much even for the most radical to stomach—including his former mentor, Maqdasi.

Dig last updated on Jun. 9, 2006




Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By clxgid, November 5 at 8:31 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I am going to recommend to others the reading of this article , it appears to have many facts and interesting analysis which should be considered when judging the conflicts in the Middle East . Indeed , “if Americans only knew” .

Report this

By Islamud-din, September 2, 2007 at 12:16 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

yur are the best muxhahid Ebu musab al zarkavi rihimullah.. strong men .., Lowe you for the snake of Allah Fisabillilah , hope to meet you in jannah Aminn

Report this

By Shenonymous, June 7, 2007 at 6:26 am #

Lefty, your eyesight is very good! Nevertheless, the world didn’t really need Zarqawi and doesn’t need bin Laden, who should have been exterminated over four years ago!

Report this

By jordan walker, May 9, 2007 at 10:34 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

i really think that genocide is wrong and that al zarqawi needed to die

Report this

By Ken Dryden, February 27, 2007 at 12:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I’ve also enjoyed the article for what Felicity in the first comment calls the author’s commenting on the great complexity & competing multi-facetedness of the insurgency in Irag, noting Zarqawi’s somewhat minor role in it, despite what certain media outlets and government spokespeople would have one believe.

Report this

By morgan-lynn lamberth, February 12, 2007 at 11:21 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Thomas Cooper plagiarizes my points, it seems, or else another great mind!Read Bishop Spong’s"Why Christianity must change or die,p152.As the song says , he is almost persuaded- to be an atheist!

Report this

By Thoasm Cooper, February 11, 2007 at 11:17 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Turning the other cheek can lead to more violence. Forget Yeshua’s worthless words and use common sense. The god of the New Fables-Yeshua - is the Yahwe of the Old Fables. We rationalists use the morality Michael Shermer des cribes in “The Science of Good and Evil.” Ghandi and King did not go against such evil.  Errantists just gloss over the n onsense of their Fables.

Report this

By Naturally Abrasive, June 26, 2006 at 2:36 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Let’s congratulate ourselves… We are winning the war that Iran could not on Iran’s behalf.
Too bad we’ll never benefit from it.  My heart goes out to the families of those young soldiers (many not old enough to drink) who died in Bush’s crusade.

Report this

By Henry James, June 18, 2006 at 9:21 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

2006-06-15 George Will on Zarqawi’s death

Report this

By Bob Who, June 13, 2006 at 7:47 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Look at his eyebrows how high they are the other 22 picture eyebrows closer to the eyes !!
my 6 cents ?>:”

Report this

By FreeDem, June 12, 2006 at 3:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Comment #11569 by Lefty on 6/11 at 8:15 pm
“Self defense against people who strap bombs to themselves and blow themselves up in order to target innocent civilians is not even murder, much less a holocaust.”

Simple populatioin dynamics will force a decision, either a secular state, or an increasingly harsh religious one. If the latter there is only one possible “Final solution” either wholesale or in drawn out bits. Otherwise oppressed angry people will continue to strap on bombs.

If you blame all people who did not strap on the bombs for those who did, you create your own enemy faster than they destroy themselves. The Isrealies suffer from the thoughtlessness of their founders and have no honorable solution to their problem. Acting on religious beliefs, regardless of religion, can have that effect. As Americans in Iraq, are finding also.

_on Topic_ great article, I would like to see more detail of the realities of the situation there. The complexities have grown more important in the last few years, and no solution can be discovered untill they are understood.

Report this

By Voltaire, June 11, 2006 at 10:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Tarpley/0606/20060610_Sat_Ta rpley2.mp3

I was listening to Ralph Shoneman on Tarpley’s World Crisis radio. He cited some source that said that Zarqawi was already dead in 2004. Also the video that showed “Zarqawi” executing Nick Berg revealed a man wearing US issue army boots and a gold jewelry. In the Middle East only women wear gold jewelry. On top of that, Zarqawi’s death photo shows a remarkably whole corpse. The US media said that two 500 pound bombs were dropped on Zarqawi’s house. Don’t you think the corpse would look like a crispy coal after that? With people like Gore Vidal on board, I would think Truth Dig could be more skeptical.

Report this

By Lefty, June 11, 2006 at 7:15 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Comment #11526 by July Canute on 6/11 at 6:01 am

“The actual terrorists on this planet are George Bush and the vile Jewish zionist neo-cons like Bill Kristol and Olmert Emud.  It is shocking and uncivilized to plaster those photos on your website.  This man is a creation of a zionist holocaust and people who have stolen the White House. . . .”

Did you mean Ehud Olmert?  I would agree that there is probably no bigger fool in the world than a right wing Jew.  And yes, BushCo are fascists, liars, crooks, torturers and murderers.  But to even utter the term “zionist holocaust” is beyond outrageous.  It’s absurd! The holocaust was an attempted extermination of the entire Jewish population of the world.  Zionists haven’t tried, nor would they ever try, to exterminate anyone.  Self defense against people who strap bombs to themselves and blow themselves up in order to target innocent civilians is not even murder, much less a holocaust.

Report this

By Lefty, June 11, 2006 at 11:19 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Comment #11512 by G-Delic on 6/10 at 6:16 pm

“I agree with everything above but the “Fundamentalist Christian” part.  I think by stereotyping a group people rather then individual opinions, it’s just trying to futher perpetuate the blame game.  This is not a Fundamentalist Christian crusade of revenge against Muslim Terrorists.  I find myself on many occasions similarly saying why do Muslims do all the terrorist acts, beheadings, suicide bombings? . . .”

Fundamentalist Christians have a long history (including very recent history) and tradition of as bad or worse.

Report this

By William Day, June 11, 2006 at 10:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Let me say first that getting rid of the likes of this man is welcome news! But, let me be cynical for a moment; two 500 lb bombs, both making a direct hit on the house, and leaving total demolition of the house and a multi-yard crater below the house and he lived through it? And the body was retrieved totally intact? Hmmmmmm glad he’s gone, but it leaves a lot of questions unanswered at best!

Report this

By Snobar, June 11, 2006 at 6:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s a bliss for an old journalist to read such well researched and balanced pieces as this. My only sorrow is that it probably will be read by too few, and definitively not by the ones who ought to…

But let me also turn your attention to another piece of journalism which may shed some light on the relationship between Zarqawi and the Bush administration. Greg Palast wrote it, and you may read it if you click on my signature.

Report this

By July Canute, June 11, 2006 at 5:01 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The actual terrorists on this planet are George Bush and the vile Jewish zionist neo-cons like Bill Kristol and Olmert Emud.  It is shocking and uncivilized to plaster those photos on your website.  This man is a creation of a zionist holocaust and people who have stolen the White House.

Why don’t you plaster photos of America on this page.  Ask not for whom the bell tolls because it tolls for US.

Report this

By Tony Waters, June 10, 2006 at 8:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Let me get this straight:

1. Zarqawi was betrayed by someone(s) close to him.

2. Quite possibly, the betrayal was orchestrated by Bin Laden.

3. The U.S. offered a $25 million reward for information leading to…

4. If they pay it, will the U.S. be funding Bin Laden again?

Report this

By Lefty, June 10, 2006 at 6:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I don’t see much difference between fundamentalist christians and fundamentalist muslims.

Report this

By G-Delic, June 10, 2006 at 5:16 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I agree with everything above but the “Fundamentalist Christian” part.  I think by stereotyping a group people rather then individual opinions, it’s just trying to futher perpetuate the blame game.  This is not a Fundamentalist Christian crusade of revenge against Muslim Terrorists.  I find myself on many occasions similarly saying why do Muslims do all the terrorist acts, beheadings, suicide bombings?  And it’s the easiest that way to rationalize the terrible events so that I can justify why the things that are happening are.  But I have to actively fight the thoughts that are so motivated by anger from injustice and remember that when we remove the political, ethnic, and cultural facades, we’re all human beings. 

We have families we love dearly, we feel hurt, we feel pain, as well as happiness and laughter.  At the core we are unique individuals and that’s how we ought to treat each other.

Report this

By Tony Wicher, June 10, 2006 at 5:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

“It took further public relations efforts by the United States to transform Zarqawi into who he became.” And what did he become? A one-year wonder, conscious of the fame conferred upon him by American procaganda, who ended up making a Jihadi’s Funniest Home Video, starring him as a fat clown, and getting righteously blown away, for which even bin Laden and Zawahiri can be happy along with the rest of us, except his family and Michael Berg, I suppose. No, wait! News flash! His family IS happy now that he is with his 72 virgins, so that leaves only Michel Berg.

Report this

By Joseph Urban, June 10, 2006 at 5:02 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I’ve also enjoyed the article for what Felicity in the first comment calls the author’s commenting on the great complexity & competing multi-facetedness of the insurgency in Irag, noting Zarqawi’s somewhat minor role in it, despite what certain media outlets and government spokespeople would have one believe.

Looking forward to reading Mr. Rosen’s newly published book, In the Belly of the Green Bird.

Joseph Urban

Report this

By Chris Golson, June 10, 2006 at 4:03 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Good article and excellent background information.

Wasn’t he also the individual who beheaded Americans on video and broadcast this on the internet?
If not, then this should be corrected in the backgrounder. But if so, it certainly is a measure of the man’s brutality- exactly something which should be passed over.
What am I missing here?

Report this

By Darrel King, June 10, 2006 at 3:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Hi Mr Rosen,
Thank you so much for your story. I thought it was very interesting and well written.

It’s great to know how everything unfolded and as you said America helped make him what he was or gave him his power at first.
I will pass your story on to some of my friends because everyone should read it.

Good luck in your future writings.

Darrel King

Report this

By Morgan-LynnLamberth, June 10, 2006 at 2:12 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Turning the other cheek ,could lead to death.To give the robber more is just plain dumb.Errantists read into Yeshua.s nonsense what they will.And Yeshua was Yahwe of the Deluge and the plagues and all that genocide. Subscribe to the rational moralilty of Michael Shermers’s ‘“ The Science of Good and Evil.” Ghandi and King did not face a Hitler or a Pol Pot. Peter Beinart knows rational liberalism. Arthur Caplan and Paul Kurtz also know rational morality.

Report this

By Morgan-LynnLamberth, June 10, 2006 at 2:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Turning the other cheek can lead to more violence. Forget Yeshua’s worthless words and use common sense .[Who gives the robber more?] The god of the New Fables-Yeshua - is the Yahwe of the Old Fables. We rationalists use the morality Michael Shermer des cribes in “The Science of Good and Evil.” Ghandi and King did not go against such evil.  Errantists just gloss over the n onsense of their Fables.

Report this

By Quy Tran, June 10, 2006 at 1:57 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Thanks to Zarqawi’s cadaver Bush’s ratings have been drastically improved from -0 to +0. Congratulations !

Report this

By Morgan-LynnLamberth, June 10, 2006 at 1:15 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Turning the other cheek can lead to more violence. Forget Yeshua’s worthless words and use common sense .[Who gives the robber more?] The god of the New Fables-Yeshua - is the Yahwe of the Old Fables. We rationalists use the morality Michael Shermer des cribes in “The Science of Good and Evil.” Ghandi and King did not go against such evil. What ludicrity! Errantists just gloss over hte nonsense of their Fables.

Report this

By David Hahn, June 10, 2006 at 12:33 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Now we are a nation of assassins and torturers (to say nothing of the many thousands of civilians--and our own military-- who have died for this illegal war).

Hats off to the blood-thirsty press.

Report this

By Umar Ibrahim, June 10, 2006 at 12:15 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

May Allah accept him as matyr
That is his good end
now the good ones have departed leaving behind the evil ones(Bush and others)

We are waiting the bad end of the evil ones

Report this

By David, June 10, 2006 at 12:15 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

In the end,there is no martyrdom,no paradise and no god(s).
If logic and reason had any part in religion,what then would become of faith?

Report this

By felicity smith, June 10, 2006 at 9:17 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Fascinating article.  Thanks.  If nothing else it erases the Bush administration’s erroneous black and white picture of the Middle East and the world of Islam replacing it with a multi-colored, multi-shaded picture of huge complexity.  One thing, seemingly unrelated, that jumped out at me was the statement that American forces were in Saudi Arabia to protect it from Saddam, which led me to wonder if the Gulf War and the Iraqi War were waged partly to defend Saudi Arabia.  The long-time close ties between the Bush family and the Saudi royal family would certainly support the possibility.

Report this

By Hilding Lindquist, June 10, 2006 at 8:44 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

It is interesting--to say the least--that people in what many of them call a Christian nation (USA) actually think that the death of a leader at the hands of an enemy will quell an insurgency. Duh! Hasn’t history taught us anything?!

I mean, sure it might happen ... that is the insurgency might start to wane ... I don’t know, but I doubt it. We haven’t given the Muslim street a whole bunch of alternatives to sectarian violence a la strong militias to provide security for their families.

And my view of the truth is that if Iraq stabilizes now ... it will be a huge victory for Iran.

I consider Zarqawi to have been both our enemy and an enemy of the values and pricnciples to which I subscribe. But as Ghandi and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr taught us so eloquently, violence begats violence.

And the lesson ascribed to Jesus is that the stonger person must offer peace, and the children of God--by definition--are always the strongest. Turning the other cheek is not an act of weakness. This idea was the sea-change from the Old Testament to the New Testament.

It’s amazing how Fundamentalist Christians (in bed with the Neocons) just don’t get it. They are all stuck in the Old Testament with Joshua at Jericho.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Del.icio.us this item Del.icio.us
Digg this item Digg
Facebook this item Facebook
Ma.gnolia this item Ma.gnolia
Newsvine this item Newsvine
Reddit this item Reddit
StumbleUpon this item StumbleUpon
Yahoo this item Yahoo


Truthdig Bazaar
Suggested
Reading List

In the Belly of the Green Bird

In the Belly of the Green Bird

By Nir Rosen

$17.16

- - -
 
 
 
 
 
 

Advertisement



A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.