LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
December 3, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

DIG DIRECTOR

Onnesha Roychoudhuri
Onnesha Roychoudhuri is a San Francisco-based freelance writer. A former assistant editor of AlterNet.org, she has written for AlterNet, The American Prospect, MotherJones.com, In These Times, Huffington Post, Truthdig, PopMatters, and Women's eNews.






 
 

Inside the Data Mine

(Page 3)

On May 11, 2006, USA Today reported that Qwest CEO Nacchio and his lawyers asked the government to take its request to the FISA court, or to get a letter of authorization from the attorney general’s office. When the government refused, Qwest refused to grant access to its customers’ records, leaving the data-mining program with a Qwest-size hole in its database—including portions of 14 states in the West and Northwest. There were bound to be repercussions. As USA Today’s Leslie Cauley writes:

The NSA, which needed Qwest’s participation to completely cover the country, pushed back hard. Trying to put pressure on Qwest, NSA representatives pointedly told Qwest that it was the lone holdout among the big telecommunications companies. It also tried appealing to Qwest’s patriotic side: In one meeting, an NSA representative suggested that Qwest’s refusal to contribute to the database could compromise national security, one person recalled. In addition, the agency suggested that Qwest’s foot-dragging might affect its ability to get future classified work with the government. Like other big telecommunications companies, Qwest already had classified contracts and hoped to get more.

This was no minor threat. In the telecommunications world, companies cannot remain competitive without the government contracts that keep them afloat. Market analysts of government business at INPUT recently released a report stating that the Department of Defense is the “leading spender on telecommunications products and services in the federal government. This situation is contrary to the general rule that civilian agencies outspend the DoD on information technology.”

Tracking Qwest

The famed ego of Joe Nacchio, not a well-liked character, has made him something of a notorious Denver personality. The tough guy from New Jersey with oversize britches was finally ousted from Qwest and subjected to a three-year-long Department of Justice investigation that ended with Nacchio facing 42 counts of insider trading. A mini-Enron of sorts, but with one substantial difference: Nacchio claims that he was anticipating secret government contracts that were never delivered.

He had reason to believe something would be coming his way.

In early 2001, President Bush appointed him chairman of the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee—a group that works to keep the president up to date on national security issues that involve telecommunication infrastructure. A Denver telecommunications analyst, Donna Jaegers, recalls a meeting with Nacchio in which he was “gaga” over the possibility of certain government contracts. It was while he was serving on the committee that Nacchio allegedly inflated the value of Qwest. And it was also while he was on the committee, claims Nacchio lawyer Herbert Stern, that Nacchio was approached by the government with a request to access private telephone records of Qwest customers. 

As the story goes, Nacchio refused. While the refusal may be due, in part, to an altruistic defense of consumer privacy, there also existed the very real threat of privacy lawsuits for handing over consumer information without appropriate warrants. To wit, AT&T, Verizon and a handful of other companies are currently facing some $5 billion in damage claims if found guilty of violating telecommunications laws.

After making the initial statement about his client’s refusal to participate in the data-mining program, Stern has remained mum, refusing all press inquiries.

In an interview, Cliff Stricklin, a prosecutor from Stern’s opposition, simply grins and urges me to look up a legal strategy called “graymail.”

Graymail: (n.) a maneuver used by the defense in a spy trial whereby the government is threatened with the revelation of national secrets unless the case against the defendant is dropped.

In other words: Take me to court and I’ll reveal state secrets. Nacchio’s defense team ended up making the secret contracts a minor part of his defense due to rulings from the judge in closed sessions regarding classified information. It is likely that this defense will resurface in his appeal or his upcoming defense against the SEC’s charges of accounting fraud.

Twenty-six years into a career at AT&T, Nacchio was thought to be next in line to former AT&T Chairman Robert Allen. When he was passed up, he went his own way, building Qwest into a competitor to his former employer. As former Denver prosecutor Craig Silverman told a local reporter, “Nacchio used to be part of George W. Bush’s team, but now the Justice Department is trying to take all of his money and freedom.” History repeats itself: Nacchio is once again a disgruntled former employee and he’s not going down without a fight. It’s a good old-fashioned grudge match with cocky foes threatening to air the others’ dirty laundry.

Graymail may not be a remarkably unique concept, but the sudden evaporation of this close, security-level relationship and the timing of the Justice Department’s investigation are suggestive of government retribution. Bruce Afran, one of the lawyers leading the class-action suit against AT&T and Verizon for their participation in the government’s data-mining program, has followed the Nacchio case closely. When pressed during an interview, Afran chooses his words carefully: “We can’t ignore that Nacchio has been the only one to refuse to participate in the program, and that he was then indicted.” Afran explains that, because chief executives are paid in shares or options, they’re always selling shares. “Whenever you want to take revenge on an uncooperative CEO, all you need to do is charge him with insider trading,” says Afran, referring to a strategy commonly known as “selective prosecution.” He pauses, sips from his coffee, leans in a bit, and says, “As a lawyer, I think this is clearly a pretext for punishing him for failing to go along with their [the government’s] program.”

Even if you don’t buy that Nacchio’s indictment for insider trading is payback for his refusal to participate in the president’s data-mining program, Nacchio’s former company, Qwest, has taken some hard knocks in the business world. Knocks that, given the soaring stocks and the unprecedented merger success of other companies implicated in data mining, become all the more salient. 

When I tried to meet with a legal adviser of Qwest, I encountered Qwest spokesman Bob Toevs. Toevs thanked me for repeatedly “reaching out” in my requests for an interview regarding the harsh regulations the Justice Department has imposed on Qwest deals. When I tried to sidestep Toevs by sending direct e-mails to two Qwest employees, I got another e-mail from Toevs thanking me again for my attempt to reach out to his team, again refusing, and wishing me safe travel home.

Curiously, the three Denver reporters I spoke to told me how helpful Toevs had been. “Perhaps,” one reporter told me outside of Nacchio’s hearing, “they don’t want to talk about the bad luck they’ve had.” With a new CEO leading the company slowly out of debt, it’s likely Qwest is interested in leaving the past behind—and avoiding rehashing any unpleasantries that could hurt its chances of winning government contracts. One telecommunications expert who agreed to speak only without being identified summed up the past two years of mergers like this: “It’s as if AT&T and Verizon can’t lose.” It is widely acknowledged that Qwest has not been so lucky—becoming fodder in the D.C. rumor mill. Celebrated intellectual property and trade regulation lawyer Gary Reback heard a rumor from some D.C. lawyers and lobbyists that Qwest was being disadvantaged for not participating in the data-mining program.

In 2003, Qwest announced that it had reached an agreement to acquire most of the assets of a small, bankrupt company called Allegiance. The Department of Justice agreed to the deal, but only if stringent conditions were met—divestiture of every single piece of Allegiance’s network that was inside of Qwest’s territory. After a long period of bidding, Qwest ended up losing the deal to another company. In 2005, Qwest tried again to expand its holdings by merging with MCI. Qwest and Verizon were engaged in a bidding war—if you can call it that—for MCI, with Qwest consistently offering MCI a higher bid—in the end, $9.9 billion to Verizon’s $8.45 billion. Yet, Verizon somehow won out.

Dig last updated on Aug. 10, 2007


Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.


More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

By great_satan, September 9, 2007 at 4:26 pm #

NSA has been spying on US citizens in the US for decades, they have also shared that information with domestic law enforcemnet, such as FBI and DEA. Why do you think you never really heard about the NSA in the media for soooo many years. Most people really didn’t know who they were. Everyone knew the CIA, but not many people knew about NSA.
  Before 9/11 they’re own codebreaking had been surpassed by basic internet encryption. Right before 9/11 a month or two before, the Director got on 60 minutes and basically said as much, (a first to be sure.) Right after 9/11 the Gov’t was granted access to backdoor codes.
  I agree that using special encryption methods will just get you a red flag. Also once a particular email adress or ISP # is red flagged, you will get monitored. No doubt.
  The real problem with NSA and CIA is they fact that they are government men and women, they work for a system, and participate in an organized ideological conspiracy, ie. the federal governemnt/military-industrial complex. They cannot identify with individuals who hold their own beliefs; they realy think that if one holds some belief, does some research or wishes to oppose their “conspiracy,” that person must be “working for someone.” They are the worst conspiracy theorists of them all. Its the basic psychology of projection.
  So the real problem is that someone doing research or writing letters is not going to be seen as a free individual, but as linked in with some network. The old six degrees of separation factor will tie just about anyone in with something. The CIA works indirectly, through a series of buffers, so they will assume the various degrees of separation are buffers too. This is how these spooks think; unfortunately, due to the secrets they hold, mos are barred from seeking professional psychiatric help.

Report this

By cann4ing, September 9, 2007 at 1:47 pm #

Re comment #99410 by Michael Shaw.  Excellent post!  To it I would add the observation made by Senator Frank Church way back in the 1970s.  He said that if the NSA eavesdropping and data collection capabilities were ever put to domestic use, there would truly be “no place to hide.”

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, September 9, 2007 at 9:00 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

“I had two choices. A-was to swipe my credit card(any one would do) through this weird looking atm machine or B-I would miss my flight and god knows what else. Banks, hospitals and pharmacy’s are an open link to everybody’s business. They might not know what you’re sending in an email but before they’re through they’ll know what books you read, who you donate money too and where you buy your underwear.”

Convenience trumps principle every time.

Don’t fly
Bank outside the US (I find the Caymans secure)
Pay for everything with cash.
Buy nothing on credit.
Throw your drivers license/ identity card/information bank away.
Obey ALL THE LAWS if they don’t see you, they can’t hassle you.
Give no one your social security number

New Hampshire allows you to register a car with no proof of who you are, and they do not require insurance.

There are several states which still give out drivers licenses which are just drivers licenses. no social security number required

Banking outside the US is easy, and you don’t even have to leave your computer.

I surely understand that most people would rather complain than take action, but there is relief available.

If this “security stuff” starts costing states big money, and banks customers on a massive scale, they’ll stop… Remember the first law of US citizenship… “Money first” all other US statuates are based on law one.

Report this

By Michael Shaw, September 8, 2007 at 11:58 pm #

Well David, I appreciate your expertise but my main point is that encryption is an open invitation to the feds that something bad is going on and they have other avenues, like seizing your computer or investigating your financial statements etc. Encryption does not hide the source of an email. 

After lobbying congress with the ACLU over the patriot act, when leaving from Reagan National, I became a victim of the very thing I lobbied against. The situation was simple. I had two choices. A-was to swipe my credit card(any one would do) through this weird looking atm machine or B-I would miss my flight and god knows what else. Banks, hospitals and pharmacy’s are an open link to everybody’s business. They might not know what you’re sending in an email but before they’re through they’ll know what books you read, who you donate money too and where you buy your underwear.

Report this

By DavidJames, September 7, 2007 at 7:49 pm #

99179 Michael,

You said, “When you send encrypted mail to someone they use a code to de-scramble it. It would be naive to think for a moment the government doesn’t have that same capability.”

They can only decrypt the data if they have the decryption key.

Regardless of whether the government or anyone else has the encryption/decryption software, they do not have the ability to decrypt RC4 or AES encrypted information unless they have the decryption key.  This is actually the point of good encryption algorithm design. 


Both the RC4 and AES algorithms as well as many others are published but are still essentially unbreakable.  That an algorithm is published and widely available for study, yet remains unbroken, is a requirement for secure encryption algorithms.  A secret algorithm may be secure, but who could tell.  The RC4 and AES algorithms are encryption algorithms and the software that implements them has been published and available for anyone’s inspection for some time.

Here is a link to Skype web page on security:

http://www.skype.com/security/security/

While Skype’s security is good.  Email S-MIME is even better.

As you suggest, the only practical way to decrypt the encrypted messages is to get the decryption key off of your computer.

Report this

By Michael Shaw, September 7, 2007 at 4:18 pm #

98586 David I agree that encryption like the kinds you mention or that banks use can protect your email data from spying. However since the government red flags encryption emails it doesn’t mean they won’t utilize other investigative measures to spy on you, including home invasion, access to your medical and financial records etc. Encrypted mail presents an interest and with back door spying portals, even encrypted code can be broken if the government decides to. Let’s not forget if you can get this Skype program so can the government. When you send encrypted mail to someone they use a code to de-scramble it. It would be naive to think for a moment the government doesn’t have that same capability.
What I really find disturbing is putting all of your information into one basket. Even though these new national id’s (like the ones about to be implemented in Arizona) are encrypted, keeping your data “safe”, the system is only as good as the overseers(in this case several thousand) who have that data at the touch of a finger. Bank embezzlement is nothing new to our society and no matter how well encrypted their system is, embezzlements happen. In a world where everyone was honest and could be trusted this id plan would be fine. Then again if that were the case we wouldn’t need such a plan in the first place. You and I both know people, even people in the highest ranks of government can often not be trusted. These same people we cannot trust are thrusting this system upon us. From that can come no good.

Report this

By DavidJames, September 4, 2007 at 6:57 pm #

Regardless of what this administration does, you can be relatively immune to this type of spying, if you use encrypted email and an encrypted IP phone like Skype. 

The Wikipedia references I give below claim that these algorithms are currently secure.  From these references, it appears that publicly available encryption technology used in these applications is secure.  This leaves us with a question:  Is this spying technology just an enormous government boondoggle?  Business already uses encryption extensively for e-commerce.  The IP phone software Skype is encrypted as well. 

The public key/private key digital signatures, enabling encrypted e-mail(S-MIME) are available free for personal use at:

http://www.thawte.com/secure-email/personal-email-certificates/index.html?click=DoYouNeedTo-SecureMail

If you get the 2048 bit key your email communications are quite secure. 

The Skype IP phone uses similar encryption systems for Skype to Skype communication.  Skype to Skype phone calls are free and encrypted.  You can download Skype at:

http://www.skype.com/intl/en/helloagain.html

Because of the volume of Skype to Skype calls internationally and the encryption your privacy is will be well protected.


The encryption algorithms used for S-MIME and Skype are the RSA and AES algorithms.  Here are the links the Wikipedia sections on these algorithms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Encryption_Standard

These are open source algorithms that have been extensively studied and are considered to be secure.  What this means is that if some one encrypts something using your public key the corresponding private key is necessary to decrypt it.  Basically it all comes down to private key security.  If you are the only person that has your private key you are going to be the only one that can decrypt the message.

Report this

By Michael Shaw, September 4, 2007 at 2:32 pm #

My point is that even outside the Bush regime our political system is askew. No one will do a thing in congress to stop Bush from doing what he intends to do. some might talk tough but in the end nothing will be done. We certainly don’t have the judiciary on our side either. Bush will do what he wants, even if it means WW3 and we’re paying ten dollars a gallon for gas.

Report this

By Michael Shaw, September 4, 2007 at 2:26 pm #

Here-Here Ernest, either that or he doesn’t stand a chance in hell like Kucinich.

Now that war with Iran is imminent, congress will simply sit there twiddling their thumbs. I guess the next step might be for the con-di-dates to talk tough in denouncing his actions so they don’t look unpatriotic and appear weak on national defense.

Report this

By cann4ing, September 3, 2007 at 9:59 pm #

Michael, you must be kidding.  Inside the Bush regime, a government official who is intelligent and honest is soon to be a former government official.

Report this

By Michael Shaw, September 3, 2007 at 3:14 pm #

98263 And we have to depend on all these government officials who have this information as being honest and perhaps more importantly, intelligent. As I’ve always said, there is no such thing as secure, foolproof data and there will always be a way around it. It’s only a matter of time. Meanwhile all of us will be at their mercy and our lives like front page news. They also share the information they gather with government officials outside of this country and every DMV in the nation will have access to your business. And like Great Satin said more and more intelligence gathering is done by private corporations. How many of them are honest?

Report this

By great_satan, September 3, 2007 at 12:39 pm #

What is over-looked in this otherwise exhaustive piece, is that far beyond the complicity of the telecommunication companies, the actual mining will be done by private intelligence firms, such as Abraxas, Raytheon, and so forth. The role of the privates is moving from complicity and profiteering to really running the show, politicians becoming no more than washed up celebrities doing info-mercials. The “on the side that’s winning” new regime loyalists/constitutional traitors move quietly out of their government jobs into directorial jobs in corporate spydom. Tom Ridge now helps direct Abraxas… for instance. The CIA gets worse and worse press, and already the remaining constituionalists are not only being subordinated to the corporates, discredited repeatedly, and threatened by “oops, did I leak your name..” from the white house, but they are beginning tolabeled as outright saboteers and traitors to “America.”

Report this

By Johnny Doughey, September 3, 2007 at 2:03 am #

Re: Encription…

These encription algorithisms are definitly, entirely secure…
Unless, of course, you happen to be one of the folks with the key, such as the FBI and others…

Report this

By purplewolf, August 31, 2007 at 1:19 am #

# 96858 Ga on 8/25:
Gee Ga,to bad you weren’t here last week on the 22nd. There were phone problems like being disconnected off and on all day.In these phone calls were heard: background phones ringing, people talking, sounds similar to that of fax machines. This started at 8:30am until after 6pm. No phone work was done anywhere is the area. Must be Ma Bell or Sprint had their wired crossed somewhere. And yet for all the technicology we have today the service keeps getting worse.And then they have the nerve to make us pay for this service or lack thereof.

Do you know what the farmer said to his son? Shhh! The corn has ears and the potatoes have eyes.

Report this

By Michael Shaw, August 30, 2007 at 4:23 pm #

97693

David,

I appreciate your analogy of this situation and it has merit. But I’d like to add that encryption is exactly what the government is looking for, especially in email communications. Terrorists know this and it is my understanding they do not encrypt for this very reason. Any encrypted message(especially from overseas) is construed as suspicious and becomes red flagged.  Like you say there is so much technology out there and so many communications are made on any give day, there will always be a way to skirt around and security measure. Nothing is fool proof and businesses and even government agencies are hacked often.

When we look at the results, data mining is really ineffective. To me it’s like the old Casablanca addage, “Round up the usual suspects!” Only in this case everybody is a suspect and everybody is being treated as a potential terrorist. Then comes the national ID plan that puts all of our pertinent information into one basket, allowing thousands of DMV employees, government agents, foreign countries and God knows who else to have access, making it easier to steal or abuse our identities. I see all of it as state manipulated chaos. Big brother is watching so be afraid, be very afraid. As Ritter once pointed out the government has actually regulated fear, given it color codes. They tell literally how afraid we should be. They also tell us(usually just prior to an election) someone is going to attack us. When asked where, they don’t know! By whom? They don’t know! When? They don’t know! Now it is not only enough to fear terrorism, we have to fear our own government as well.

The bottom line is data mining is like searching for a needle in a haystack but again as you point out, it can be used effectively to discover political trends and affiliations which creates an environment that allows the information gatherers to “fix” elections. For example they can see where democrats are sending money to in various states, then send even more money to their republican counterparts.

With all the spying and data mining, torture and every other crazy thing they’ve done, the results are pretty dismal. But plenty of mistakes have been made along the way and will continue to be made as long as we must live under this draconian insanity.

Report this

By DavidJames, August 30, 2007 at 2:22 pm #

Onnesha,

Data mining is effective using publicly available unencrypted data for marketing or industrial/political opposition research.  How do the proponents of this extensive data mining deal with the argument that it will be ineffective against a intelligent opponent that would be using encryption? 

Encrypted communication is the cornerstone of electronic banking and commerce.  A terrorist could use publicly available encrypted communication systems to avoid being noticed by the data mining system.  Their encrypted communications would hardly be noticed in the flood of encrypted communications that occur in daily commerce and they can aways obscure their origin by using a secure proxy.

Report this

By Michael Shaw, August 27, 2007 at 1:27 pm #

If you’ll remember Ernest Bush put Poindexter in charge of the program until the news resurfaced showing Poindexter as the only guy who served any real prison time for Iran/Contra. Criminals in charge of spying! How quaint!

Report this

By Tony Wicher, August 25, 2007 at 6:18 pm #

Re #96858 by Ga on 8/25 at 11:07 am

The walls have ears. You can’t be too careful. They’re definitely out to get us.

Report this

By Ga, August 25, 2007 at 3:07 pm #

Now since I have been writing on Truthdig I have noticed what we call a bounce effect on the phone like a hollow sound.Well if this is the idiots at NSA…

How bizarre…

If you think that some of the “idiots” somehow got into Truthdig’s server and somehow saw it’s server logs and somehow matched a log entry to your particular post and Truthdig openly logged your IP address and the “idiots” somehow matched that IP address back to your phone… you should be using an anonymous connection!!!

But I am being sarcastic.

You have to be joking or do you really want us to believe that you believe that a post to a webserver (using HTTP) can trigger a wiretap on your phone? And that the wiretap would cause audible noise in your receiver?

Bizarre? No. Insane.

Report this

By cann4ing, August 20, 2007 at 12:25 pm #

The purpose of NSA data mining and eavesdropping, satellite-based visual spying, etc., can be summed up by the symbol chosen by Admiral Poindexter for his “Total Information Awareness” program, a pyramid topped by an all-seeing eye.  At it’s base is the inscription “Scienter Est Potentia”—Latin for “knowledge is power.” 

Poindexter did not have in mind knowledge shared by the American people.  The Bush administration operates behind a one-way mirror.  They want the ability to know everything about each of us but would, to the extent possible, deny the American people, and even Congress, the right to know what takes place within the adminnistration’s corridors of power.

The concept of “wire tapping” referenced by several posters misses the mark.  As explained by James Bamford, there is a fundamental difference between FBI & NSA eavesdropping capabilities.  The FBI is “a sort of retail eavesdropper.  They will go from house to house or put a bug on a central telephone company’s office for where a person happens to have their junction box…The NSA…does it wholesale, where they take entire streams of communications coming down from satellites, which can contain millions of communications…[and then] filter the information through very quick computers that are loaded with names of people, words that they’re looking for….One listening post in the central part of England…[can] intercept two million pieces of communications an hour….Senator Frank Church, back in the mid-70s, when he was conducting his investigation of the NSA, said that if the NSA’s technology were ever turned on the American public, there would be no place to hide.”

In “Body of Secrets,” Bamford describes the NSA’s “Crypto City” as “home to the largest collection of hyperpowerful computers, advanced mathematicians, and language experts on the planet.”  To this, Robert O’Harrow, in “No Place to Hide” adds that while much of what the NSA does is shrouded in secrecy, amongst the known programs is the Information Exploitation initiative which is designed to “yield even faster networks and computers that can extract, synthesize and display intelligence ‘from vast repositories of raw and structured data in ‘all human languages.’  That data might include telephone calls, email, credit card puyrchases, television video, photograms, even the images transmitted by mobile phones.”

Report this

By CitizenDefender, August 18, 2007 at 3:12 pm #

We are a tribal society being pushed by “CENTRAL BANKING” toward a single world government. All the posturing that so-called power brokers like our administration, Russia, England is only a front for the Banking system that keeps everything operating on a Debt system.
If everyone stopped relying on borrowing then the abuse by the Federal Reserve and others would come to a halt. War is of course making assholes richer. But, more importantly it feeds the CENTRAL BANK by creating more debt. They create more worthless paper notes backed up with nothing and the average citizen has no idea why they can never seem to get ahead.

Truth be told we would be much in touch with the planet if we reinstituted a BARTER system and told governments and money mongers to kiss our ass.

Of course these people will not give up their power without a fight. That is why they use the CIA, NSA, FBI, Interpol and all the other law enforcement tools they have at their disposal to silence or scare the hell out of anyone that uncovers the scam and proceeds to tell the public.

This is closer to the real truth than any public official we hear about in the news.

Money As Debt video and other good links
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/135.html
http://www.themoneymasters.com/faqs.htm
http://moneyasdebt.net/
http://www.lovethetruth.com/truth_about_money.htm

Report this

By rowdy, August 15, 2007 at 7:53 am #

working assets, the money making arm of working for change, claims they did not turn over any records to the gov. i just recently dumped both cingular and bellsouth in favor of a better monetary deal from working assets. if they are not lying, how did “onnesha” overlook this? not such great reporting.

Report this

By mackTN, August 14, 2007 at 4:19 pm #

This is superior work, investigative reporting at its best.  Truly outstanding.

Report this

By Skruff, August 13, 2007 at 6:01 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

94373 by ardee on 8/12 at 7:25 pm

“The greatest tragedy in that post of Skruff’s is that he hasnt an inkling or a clue of exactly what a monsterous stance he defends.”

You suppose I haven’t an inkling clue? This is exactly the point I made in my previous post.  You need to make a personal attack rather than explain the reason I should be forced to engage in behavior I find reprehensible ie, interfering in the lives of others.

“I am sorry that you havent a heart or a clue as to what it means to be engaged in our nation or in our community,Skruff, but you are simply , and on a very deep level, a heartless idiot.”

A person without a heart is unable to type, or dialogue by way of computer, he would be dead, so that part of your attack is provably false.

As to me being an idiot. The word Idiot is an obsolete offensive term meaning a person with an IQ under 25, or a behaviorial age of about 3 years.

Although you may disagree with me, I hardly believe you (by the tone of your posts) would attack a person with an IQ under 25, any more than you would attack a three-year-old. So you either do not believe what you have written, OR I am mistaken, and you would assault a mental incompetent.

Why not just get back to discussing issues, and stop with the personal attacks.  Very time-wasting and not productive.

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, August 13, 2007 at 5:56 pm #

#94596 by purplewolf on 8/13 at 12:21 pm: “...# 93701 Shruff ......Back in the 70’s I know my phone was taped…..... “...Now since I have been writing on Truthdig I have noticed what we call a bounce effect on the phone like a hollow sound.Well if this is the idiots at NSA or whatever government spy group are listening, they are pretty damned hard up for something to do….”

Sounds like primitive technology but I know what you mean. Also tried complaining about city hall, etc etc some time back and there were these phone survey people who kept calling asking my opinion at length on all sorts of things. When I asked who they were, they said they were “consultants”. But with the phone technology and surveillance devices now, tapping can be done without you knowing at all.


By the way, there is also eye-in-the-sky now but check this:-
Quote: “Much of Sydney’s CBD as it appears in the satellite images on Google Maps Australia has been fuzzed out, just weeks before the APEC summit. .....Google says the imagery was downgraded as a result of a “commercial issue” with a supplier, but the move has aroused speculation it was done at the request of police in order to minimise the risk of a terrorist attack during the September summit, where Sydney will play host to 21 world leaders including U.S. President George W. Bush. .......Google has in the past been accused of censoring its maps due to national security concerns by governments, most recently in June when it updated its maps of Washington D.C. but maintained older, blurry images for most of the downtown area….” http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/googles-photos-of-sydney-go-all-fuzzy/2007/08/13/1186857396182.html

Report this

By purplewolf, August 13, 2007 at 4:21 pm #

# 93701 Shruff
Back in the 70’s I know my phone was taped.Many times when I picked up there was no dialtone.On several occassions I could hear faint music in the background for several seconds then a click and a dialtone.Sometimes it took over 45 minutes after I hung up to get a dialtone again. That problem was solved when I started to play music or sound effect records back to them full blast. One time I heard a person it sounded like doing dishes,water being turned on and off a clunck of something being set down then it repeated and a baby in the backgroung, then eventually a click and a dialtone.Of course the phone company denied any illegal activity. At that time I worked in a nursing home and volunteered for the American Red Cross and the Free Medical Clinic for the poor, that may have been why.

Now since I have been writing on Truthdig I have noticed what we call a bounce effect on the phone like a hollow sound.Well if this is the idiots at NSA or whatever government spy group are listening, they are pretty damned hard up for something to do. I talk to my mother, and 1 of 2 close girlfriends and if they think they are learning anything it is about the soap operas, the latest b.s the bush bunch had done, how are we going to pay the bills this month, the dog is sick, and a lot of satire which is just that, satire-nothing coded to unravel here. Just plain off the wall stuff beyond their tiny brains can understand.If they are so hard up to learn “valuable information” they need to listen where the real threats are, but they can’t as it leads to home(i.e. the white house and beyond) and leave the senior citizens and crippled handicapped old horny ladies like us alone.

Report this

By ardee, August 12, 2007 at 11:25 pm #

The greatest tragedy in that post of Skruff’s is that he hasnt an inkling or a clue of exactly what a monsterous stance he defends.

I am sorry that you havent a heart or a clue as to what it means to be engaged in our nation or in our community,Skruff, but you are simply , and on a very deep level, a heartless idiot.

Report this

By Skruff, August 12, 2007 at 12:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Ardee says;

“You forgot one three letter phrase in your rant about unfeeling governments:”

Your lexicon is amusing it’s a “rant” when you disagree, and a “considered opinion” when you agree.

Sounds a bit like Faux News.

Yes I am a libertarian, I make no appoligies. No I do not feel I should be FORCED to support others, care for my neighbors, or assist in arranging the lives of others. Where we have agreed; I also do not believe in “helping” Iraqis attain “democracy” or expending national common fortune on useless wars.

I am not opposed to you expending your wealth, time and energy being any type of doo-gooder you wish.

Please, however, if you see me dying of starvation on some street somewhere, I would request you walk-on-by! I’ll offer you the same respect!

Report this

By ardee, August 12, 2007 at 12:13 pm #

#94081 by Com_n_sense on 8/11 at 5:32 pm

Please understand that noone cares (corporate noones) about a boycott or general strike. They know full well that what you do not buy today you will buy tomorrow.

We do not need dramatic and useless energy wasters like such as you support. This stuff makes some feel better about marching one day a year and then going back to sleep.

Skruff,

You forgot one three letter phrase in your rant about unfeeling governments:
‘In my opinion’....

I work to make a government that does indeed care, what on earth do you work for? Negativity serves what purpose, other than pushing the libertarian agenda…no government let poor people starve, fuck ‘em anyway.

Report this

By Com_n_sense, August 11, 2007 at 9:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

BE HEARD! A GENERAL STRIKE SEPT. 11th STAY HOME – BUY NOTHING

GS are effective. If you check out recent success stories of how GS have brought oppressive governments to their knees and they had to listen to the people you too would wonder why we haven’t been using this tactic earlier.
Our phone calls, letters, emails, marches, protests and our votes are NOT being listened to! If enough non-essential people stay home from work to bring this country to a standstill and do not purchase anything for that one day we’d be heard. What have we got to loss? Nothing else is working.
We can’t wait till the 09’ for the change.
We can’t wait for prolonged investigations that are being stonewalled to get justice.
We can’t wait for impeachment to be put “back on the table”.

We can’t wait for our so-called representatives to grow a spine.
We can’t wait period! Too much time has been wasted already!
Take the day off for PEACE! Everyone, cab-drivers, bakers, bankers, sales-persons, waiters, cooks, shoemakers, city workers, state workers, lawyers, everyone, stay home, buy nothing.
Ask yourself is it worth one day out of your life to save one person life?
Out of Iraq/Impeach NOW! SEPT. 11th GENERAL STRIKE! SPREAD THE WORD!
http://liberalpro.blogspot.com/2007/08/general-strike-91107.html

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, August 11, 2007 at 8:59 pm #

#94028 by Skruff on 8/11 at 1:12 pm: “...NO government “respects” anything.  BUT continuity and the status quo. ......The people in government have sold us a bill of goods. We need “councils” but not government as we have come to know them.  .......Funny creatures human beings…. Talk freedon but accept slavery…. AND #94024 by THOMAS BILLIS on 8/11 at 1:05 pm: “...Wake up America.We are being turned into sheep.The best is it is being done by a man who is two steps away from being a chimp.Enough already…...”

Quote: “IT REALLY DOESN’T MATTER IF YOU ARE JET-PROPELLED, AIR-CONDITIONED OR STEAK-FED…NOR DOES IT MATTER WHERE YOU LIVE IN THE WORLD…AND IT EQUALLY DOESN’T MATTER IF YOU THINK YOU HAVE BEEN PAID FOR WHO SAID IT: “NONE ARE SO HOPELESSLY ENSLAVED AS THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE FREE… http://www.worldslaves.citymax.com/page/page/195600.htm

I MENTION THIS BECAUSE LIKE IN MOST CASES, THE TRUTH IS SIMPLE BUT MADE TO APPEAR COMPLEX SO THE SLAVES DON’T CATCH ON…. LOSE YOUR BALL AND CHAIN - HOLD YOUR HEAD UP…”!!!!

Report this

By DavidJames, August 11, 2007 at 8:08 pm #

Practically the encryption systems used for Email(S-MIME) and IP phones like Skype, are completely secure.  Given the practically complete security (unless someone gets a quantum computer going) , what purpose does the large scale data mining system that Onnesha has presented serve?

Email encryption is based on RSA cryptography.  These encryption algorithms are, practically, secure.

Here is the link to the Wikipedia article on RSA encryption algorithms:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA

Note that in the security section it mentions that there is some debate over the encryption security of a 1024 bit digital signature.  If you get your free personal email digital signature at Thawte, make sure you select the 2048 bit digital signature.  That should be, practically, secure for a while.


The Skype IP phone uses a type of cryptography called 256 bit AES.  Here is the Wikipedia link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Encryption_Standard

The 256 bit AES encryption standard was certified by the US for secret and top secret data in 2003.

Report this

By Skruff, August 11, 2007 at 5:12 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Ardee

The phrase:

“governments that respect privacy.”

is oxymoranic. NO government “respects” anything.  BUT continuity and the status quo.

The people in government have sold us a bill of goods. We need “councils” but not government as we have come to know them. 

Funny creatures human beings…. Talk freedon but accept slavery….

Report this

By Jeanine Molloff, August 11, 2007 at 5:09 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The mere fact that such data ‘mining’ (aka SPYING) occurs so casually is an obscenity.  The US government has violated the rights of the American people, and those who have participated in the dismantling of the Bill of Rights need to be CRIMINALLY PROSECUTED.  THEY HAVE COMMITTED TREASON. 
  It is indeed ironic that when I was in high school I listed my primary ambition in life to ...“be at the top of the Nixon enemies list…”  My mother was mortified, but I was proud.  This is not merely the work of some insane conservative loonies; both parties are culpable.  The extremists under the Nazi Cheney could not have achieved these ‘benchmarks’ without the ‘collaborators’ in the Democratic party.  Time to kick them all out of office.

Report this

By THOMAS BILLIS, August 11, 2007 at 5:05 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Wake up America.We are being turned into sheep.The best is it is being done by a man who is two steps away from being a chimp.Enough already if the Democrats will not fight for us and the Republicans will be in lock step with whatever their leader does itt is time for” we the people” to show our leaders who they represent.The web logs are affecting nothing as we slip further and further into a fundamentalist christian militaristic state.It is time for those who still have the fire in their bellies to pass on to our children the great country we were given to action.It is time for the greatest march on Washington ever.We ae millions of people in search of a leader.Maybe out of TRUTH DIG that leader may emerge.I like the rest of you are appalled when we read articles like this one and feel impotent to change things.Well there is a way let millions flood Washington and let the politicians know in the words of Beale in Network"I am fed up and I am not going to take it anymore.“If there is any interest in what I am saying flood TRUTH DIG with requests to get something organized.

Report this

By ardee, August 11, 2007 at 2:39 pm #

The page cannot be found
The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.

————————————————————————————————————————

Please try the following:

If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly.

Open the video.google.com home page, and then look for links to the information you want.
Click the Back button to try another link.
Click Search to look for information on the Internet.

HTTP 404 - File not found
Internet Explorer

Report this

By Mariam Russell, August 11, 2007 at 1:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Ardee is correct….why should I have to play the silly game of spys in my own home…the United States? We have always had laws against spying, but we are a nation of sheep and do not see the need to demand that the powerful follow the same laws as we sheep, as is clear in any small podunk town where the wealthier citizens and their children are always immune, though they never get the sense of entitlement quite right, they always know better, but take advantage because they can. On up the ladder of power they believe in thier entitlement more and more as the educational process changes with wealth….real wealth.

When we the people get tired of the situation, and this means for the majority being hit over the head with it…..ending up in a Haliburton Haven, flooded out, landslid out, destroyed by killer storms, or any of the other delightful treats created for us by the greed of a few and the complicity of their payed for minions that we are pleased to term “democratically elected government”, then we will change the system as we are, after all, far more numerous than the people who hold power over us.

Report this

By 911truthdotorg, August 11, 2007 at 1:21 pm #

Everyone, please watch this video:

When asked by Barbara Walters on the night of September 11, 2001 if the 9/11
attacks were carried out by forces within the U.S., 2008 ... all » presidential
candidate and then senate intelligence committee member John Edwards becomes
evasive and refuses to answer the question, after having spoken to CIA director
George Tenet earlier that day.  «
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-886644060632694627&q=edwards+9/11+wal
ters&total=23&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

Report this

By ardee, August 11, 2007 at 11:46 am #

I believe that there is no practical and in existant system immune from eventual decription. The point is not to make codes unbreakable it is to make governments that respect privacy.

Report this

By Skruff, August 11, 2007 at 9:03 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Ardee

“But possibly less boring to listen to democratic strategists plotting campaign . Or perhaps business executives not a part of the Bush cabal discussing ways to gain a competitive advantage, etc, ad nauseum.”

Do you believe that for even one day after exposurer of the Watergate Break-in that the Democrats discussed “campaign strategies” on any unsecured line?

In your world do businessmen (women) still discuss sensitive issues on an open line?

For just a second forget government “data mining” Private business has been spying on corporate competetors at least since the indrustrial revolution. Private dectictives routinely tap phones (without court order) to find errent spouces, deadbeat dads, and bail jumpers.

Hell 10 years ago my 12-year-old could hack into people’s cell-phone conversations…. I surely hope that no one in America thinks their cell-phone conversations are private.

Some years ago, the Supreme court ruled on personal garbage. The ruling stated that once the garbage was placed on the curb, police do not need a warrant to search it.  The result has been a boom in the sale of paper shreaders.

I am not “dismissive” about the shreading of constitutional principles, BUT I am a realist.  I suggest that people wishing true privacy buy a burn barrel, move way out in the woods, and abandon their telephones.

We are all “slaves” to technology, that doesn’t concern me… What doesconcern me is some Americans still believe there is such a thing as a “private conversation.” Bet these folks believe in tooth-fairies and Santa too!

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, August 11, 2007 at 8:07 am #

#93837 by minamoto no taira on 8/10 at 6:50 pm: “...Is it only a coincidence that this buliding resembles the Ka’aba in the Great Mosque at Mecca, only way uglier…”

Is that a building? Its more like BattleStar Galactica!

Report this

By carlito paquito, August 11, 2007 at 12:00 am #

no comment. u know already;)

Report this

By minamoto no taira, August 10, 2007 at 10:50 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Is it only a coincidence that this buliding resembles the Ka’aba in the Great Mosque at Mecca, only way uglier?

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, August 10, 2007 at 9:49 pm #

#93731 by DavidJames on 8/10 at 10:39 am: “...Encryption can make you relatively immune from spying….”

An then there is “tunnelling”.....

Perhaps the real problem is not that they are listening but what they choose not to hear???

Report this

By ardee, August 10, 2007 at 8:42 pm #

“It would still be pretty boring to listen to my conversations. “

But possibly less boring to listen to democratic strategists plotting campaign strategies. Or perhaps business executives not a part of the Bush cabal discussing ways to gain a competitive advantage, etc, ad nauseum.

I must wonder at the rather dismissive note to Skruff’s post regarding a basic and serious violation of constitutional law and personal freedoms, oh well, nothing to see here…

Report this

By DavidJames, August 10, 2007 at 2:39 pm #

Encryption can make you relatively immune from spying.

Personal Email digital signature/email certificates are available free from Thawte.  These certificates enable you to use the S-MIME encryption in your email client.   

http://www.thawte.com/secure-email/personal-email-certificates/index.html?click=DoYouNeedTo-SecureMail

Encypted email is essentially immune to spying.

The Skype IP phone uses similar encryption systems for Skype to Skype communication.  Skype to Skype phone calls are free.

http://www.skype.com/intl/en/helloagain.html

Skype is also immune to spying.

Report this

By ~B~, August 10, 2007 at 12:43 pm #

In the words of Pink Floyd ...“Welcome to the Machine!”

This is not just a telecom issue either. Privatization is in many ways a clever way of circumventing our rights and the governments constitutional constraints. When everything is private through third parties why bother with warrants, FISA, or any other oversight? Privatization kills oversight and gives cover to all sorts of unethical/illegal activities. All done under the guise of “smaller” government and “cheaper” services - neither of which is true.

It will be an extremely rude awakening if America doesn’t wake up fast.

B

http://b-political.blogspot.com/

Report this

By Skruff, August 10, 2007 at 12:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Wow, big surprise, the telecom indrustry is full of spooks;

During the Vietnam war, My father was an executive with Standard Oil Company of New York (SOCONY) Later called Mobil. My mother was a peace activist with the American Friends Service Committee (declared by both the Johnson and Nixon administrations to be a “subversive” organization.  The Phone Company (not yet deregulated) tapped our phone, and not very surreptitiously. when you picked up one of the phones in our home (White Plains New York) there was a loud click, and the wurring sound of a tape recorder before you got a dial tone.  There was also a New York Telephone truck constantly working on the utility pole across the street from our house (for six full months)

Survailence ended when My brother put a sign saying “PHUCK THE FONE KOMPANY” on the front lawn.  It was all in red white and Blue, and had two small US flags next to it.  2 days later the van and the clicking phnoe, were history.

The final irony was that neither my father nor my mother used the home phone for anything other than ordering groceries. All my father’s business communicattions in those days were done on a coded “Thermofax” machine (predecessor to the “fax”.

I assume today’s “data mining” hasn’t improved.

It would still be pretty boring to listen to my conversations.

Report this

By 1drees, August 10, 2007 at 12:24 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

From what i read everyday, it seems that a lot of people are being tracked or being litsenned to, which is actually disgusting BUT what is more important is to wait and see what all this data will be used for & how.

Judging from the past actions of the US govt I SURELY DO NOT expect anything sensible to come out of it, coz nothing sensible ever came out in the past 6 years, got nothing from USA except bad news, more bad news & even worse news.

But truly anyone who is kind of opposing the wars on the blogs is surely setting oneself up for trouble, i mean just look at the crazy laws these people keep conjuring up.

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, August 10, 2007 at 11:58 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

From Bill Moyers Journal NEWSLETTER - Friday, August 10, 2007

“That is why we ought to be discussing impeachment. Not because of George Bush and Dick Cheney but because we are establishing a presidency that does not respect the rule of law. And people, Americans, are rightly frightened by that.”
- John Nichols

This week on Bill Moyers Journal (check local listings)

Talk of impeachment is in the air as a recent opinion poll says that nearly half of Americans favor impeachment of the President and more than half believe Vice President Cheney should be impeached. In a conversation that generated a passionate response when first broadcast, Bill Moyers gets perspective from Constitutional scholar Bruce Fein, who wrote the first article of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, and The Nation’s John Nichols, author of The Genius of Impeachment.

And, some markets will air an encore presentation of “Buying the War” - the premiere episode of Bill Moyers Journal that explores the role of the press in the lead-up to the invasion in Iraq. Check local listings to see if “Buying the War” will air again on your local station.

Report this

By Chaseme, August 10, 2007 at 8:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I have an idea for any cartoonist who feels this may be worthy:

A photo of millions of Americans tossing their cell phones into a huge recycle dump or perhaps a landfill; with the caption reading: “We don’t like the government’s data-mining program.”

The next photo would be either, all the phones dismantled for recycle or a bulldozer has just completely covered the phones with dirt at the landfill; with the caption reading: “Can You Hear US Now?”

Report this

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Del.icio.us this item Del.icio.us
Digg this item Digg
Facebook this item Facebook
Ma.gnolia this item Ma.gnolia
Newsvine this item Newsvine
Reddit this item Reddit
StumbleUpon this item StumbleUpon
Yahoo this item Yahoo


 
 
 
 
 
 

Advertisement



A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.