|
|||
|
DIG DIRECTOR
Christian Parenti is a correspondent for The Nation and author of "The Freedom: Shadows and Hallucinations in Occupied Iraq" (New Press, 2004). He received a PhD in sociology from the London School of Economics in 2000 and he has been a Soros Senior Justice Fellow and a Ford Foundation Fellow at... |
|
||||||||||||
Afghan AutopsyA Dig led by Christian ParentiEditor’s note: America began its so-called war on terror with the intention of driving the Taliban from power in Afghanistan. Five years later, the Taliban is back, Osama bin Laden is still alive, and insurgent fighters cite the U.S. presence in the country as their main wellspring of rage. How did it come to this?
The Taliban claimed credit for the bombing, as if to say: We can now strike anywhere. When I interviewed eyewitnesses a few days after the blast, shreds of clothing and a shoe still hung from the branches of a nearby tree. Local shopkeepers described the suicide bomber as “very clean,” “dressed in white” and “wearing eyeliner.” They said he paid $100 for a cigarette just before parking in the spot from which he launched his attack against two American Humvees. After a month traveling around Afghanistan this autumn, I was forced to a grim conclusion: This project is lost, and nothing very good will likely replace it. The reasons for the international community’s failure here are several. First, there are the immediate blunders of the occupiers who, despite extensive European involvement, are led by the Americans. Next are deeper historical dynamics dating back to the U.S. role in the anti-Soviet jihad. And finally there are much older cultural, political and economic facts about Afghanistan that have long made this a wild, lawless place, impervious to conquest and even resistant to the modernizing efforts of its urban middle classes. The stated goal of this latest occupation has been to create a functioning state where none had existed. Thus, if Afghan institutions fail, so too does the West’s project there. “You can’t have development without security,” says the waxy NATO spokesman in Kabul, Mark Laity. “And security without development won’t last.” Alas, neither obtains in Afghanistan. Consider again the contours of this crisis: Half of Afghanistan is under effective insurgent control; scores of international troops have been killed this year. Between January and Oct. 8 of this year, there were 78 suicide bombings, killing nearly 200 people. Last year saw only 17 suicide attacks. In the last six months, several previously stable provinces have slipped into chaos. A few dissident British soldiers have accused NATO and U.S. forces of bombing and strafing villages. Despite, or more likely because of this firepower, the situation in key southern provinces like Helmand and Kandahar has deteriorated badly. The British were recently forced to negotiate a withdrawal from one of their southern bases in Masa Qala, essentially surrendering the area to the Taliban. By late summer, the military crisis in southern Afghanistan was so bad that NATO’s top U.S. commander, Gen. James Jones, was begging for 2,500 extra troops to join the fight in Afghanistan’s deep south. Few extra soldiers were forthcoming. France was asked to move the 2,000 NATO troops under its command in Kabul south but refused, claiming they were needed in the capital. The resurgent Taliban now control districts just outside Kabul, in Lowgar and Wardak provinces, and are even launching attacks on NATO troops in and around Kabul. In September, Mullah Dadullah, head of the Taliban forces, claimed he had 12,000 fighters, including 500 suicide bombers, and promised escalating violence next spring. Cut those numbers in half or more and the Taliban are still a formidable force. To appear a bit more like locals, my traveling companion and I are dressed in traditional salwar kameez. My blond colleague, the filmmaker Ian Olds, has his head wrapped in a scarf. At paramilitary police checkpoints, he plays the role of a sleeping sick man. It all seems a bit ridiculous—how could the Taliban really operate this close to the city? But once we reach our destination—some villages just off the main road—the tension grows palpably thicker. People in Lowgar say that the insurgents have been operating here for about a year. They began with organizers who infiltrated from Pakistan to stir up dissatisfaction and reactivate former fighters. The guerrillas here got a major boost when the extremist and pathologically ruthless commander Gulbuddin Hekmatyar pledged the support of his Hezb-i-Islami, an old mujahedeen party, to Al Qaeda and made peace with the Taliban. A youth from Lowgar explains: “Every family has to give one man to the Taliban.” The Taliban pay their fighters more that the Afghan military, which only pays $70 a month, but the fighters have local grievances that motivate them as well. A man in Lowgar complains: “There are no jobs, no development. The government is corrupt.” To the northeast of Kabul, in Kunnar and Nuristan, one finds a different ecology of insurgents: the networks of foreign fighters of Al Qaeda. There, the radio traffic reveals Kandahari Taliban fighters overlapping with Pakistanis and Arabs. Two Afghan journalists who know this scene well describe the Al Qaeda networks along the Pakistani border east of Kabul as supplying expertise and consultative guidance to the Taliban and Hezb-i-Islami. “When I went there, they made me take out the battery and chip from my phone. They brought in an Arab who went over the camera and then disappeared,” said one of these Afghan journalists with Al Qaeda contacts. “The Arab wouldn’t be interviewed. They had Pashtun from Kandahar who had been to Kashmir. They are very smart guys.” Dig last updated on Nov. 28, 2006Advertisement |
|
||||||||||||
By Rick, November 29, 2006 at 7:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Here we go again,
Report thisMore negative, one-sided reporting, propaganda. I have been living in kabul for six months, and I have seen many unusual things, however, if you lived here, you would see the progress being made, which has less to do with the west and more to do with the Afghan’s desire to build their own lives, they are warm, generous people, they accept the sporadic violence as a part of life, and forge on, and I have not met one, not one, whom would welcome, much less allow the Taliban to exude influence here. This country will succeed, it will take many years, however, one can see amazingly positive developments everyday, if one is at ground level for more than a few days, you should try that, if you really want to be objectve.
By John Cunningham, November 29, 2006 at 3:36 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
As an old Vietnam veteran I can say I’m a bit qualified to comment on the opium/heroin aspect. People that use and sell drugs are financing terrorism. The users are totally absorbed in their own personal brand of pity and we’re all expected to be understanding and get all touchy-feely. The dealers are in it for the money, they should be executed. All we have to do is look at our inner cities here in the States and we can see in a smaller way how much ‘allowing’ a drug trade benefits those local communities. Here in Philadelphia they shoot each other everyday, everyday. You have to drag users kicking and screaming into rehabs or jail. You have to do to dealers/growers what they deserve, you shoot them. Spray the heroin fields with whatever chemical is necessary to kill the crop. The heroin farmers will go through their withdrawal, they’ll thank you for it a few years from now. Cut off the drugs you cut off the funding and they will eventually run out of bullets. It won’t be pretty. How many more years are you going to make excuses for it?
City slickers/country bumpkins/bullies/builders
I got out of the army in ‘72, never thinking I would ever have anything more to do with the military. I’m now back in my comfort zone, American cities. Philadelphia and then in ‘81 moved up to Buffalo. In ‘84 I joined the National Guard. I had always heard jokes city people would say about country people and vice versa. But, it wasn’t until I got to Buffalo when I now was living with people that did have a resentment toward their big city, New York City. It wasn’t a hatred and was mostly expressed in a joking manner, but it was something that always seemed to be in the back of their minds. Not unlike how a lot of people have this hatred of President Bush in the back of their minds, seeming to me to be continually clouding their thought processes. I again found this back of the mind displeasure of things city when I went to Louisiana in ‘89 for a military school. Now, it was only for a month but I noticed that these Louisianians living 100 miles north of New Orleans read from the same script that many in Western New York were reading. Kind of makes me wonder if any of us living in huge population centers could really depend on help from National Guard units that might be tasked to help a city in case of disaster. Can you say Katrina? I’m not being accusatory, I’m just going by feelings and impressions that have built up over the last 59 years. Some totally amazing things go on in cities, as evidenced by the fact that terrorists don’t blow up farms, they blow up cities. An Israeli diplomat made this analogy to explain the middle east. It was the bully on the beach story. Most middle easterners really don’t do much but get themselves whipped into a froth and shoot weapons into the air, the bully on the beach. Israel builds a sandcastle on the beach and the bullies response is to go over and knock it down. Some other bully’s response is to fly jets into the World Trade Center. Transfer what I’m alluding to to what’s going on in Afghanistan and it seems to me we’re dealing with easily threatened bullies. We all went through growing up years, how do you deal with a bully? Do the NATO countries have to wait until they walk into a major European city a nuclear bomb and we all wake up in the morning to find that Paris disappeared over night? ‘They’ don’t like us because we do interesting things, they don’t. They’re oh so into allah but have no qualms about growing heroin. One way or another they’re going to kill you. To paraphrase WW2 General Patton, we shouldn’t die for our beliefs, they should die for theirs.
Report thisPage 2 of 2 pages < 1 2