|
|||
|
Budget CutsPosted on Feb 16, 2011
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
By Potent_Placebo, February 17, 2011 at 3:18 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Disretionary” spending? Am I the only one who noticed this misspelling?
Report thisBy Travis McGee, February 17, 2011 at 11:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Mike,
Report thisThe Social Security fund has nothing to do with the budget deficit. Surely you know this. Why are you including it with defense and discretionary spending. You suck.
By Rob, February 17, 2011 at 6:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Except discretionary spending is almost exactly the same size as each of those other three; only discretionary spending doesn’t fund one mammoth program but a variety of lesser programs like the Department of Education or the EPA so it’s rather more like a herd of large cattle than a single animal.
Report thisBy john from ojai, February 17, 2011 at 12:19 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Only one of those elephants kills innocent civilians, benefits corporations more than people,is the major creator of new “terrorists”, and is the major reason our country is economically and spiritually bankrupt.
Report this