Clinton vs. Warren: Big Differences, Despite Claims to the Contrary
Understanding Israel's War as Racist Is Crucial to Ending Occupation
A Venerable Jewish Voice for Peace
Jon Stewart on America's Favorite Way to Promote Peace in the Middle East
Not Equal: Gaza in Over 1,000 Frames
sign up to get updates
Dig led by Mike Rose
Dig led by Truthdig Staff
By Gary J. Dorrien $35.00
By Marc Cooper
By Mr. Fish
More Below the Ad
Email to a friend
Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.
If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.
By Ivan Hentschel, May 22, 2008 at 8:24 am Link to this comment
Kind of reminds me of the bellicose politcian, who tells the people, “I’m going to free every one of you, if I have to kill you all to do it!”, or something like that.
On the other hand, we won’t have to worry about not be able to see the forest for the trees when we have neither.
By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, May 20, 2008 at 5:40 pm Link to this comment
And I don’t suppose the internet, in any way, takes its own toll on the environment. So, are we talking about hypocrisy? Are we talking about degrees of hypocrisy? Are we trying to establish a line before which hypocrisy is ok and beyond which it isn’t?
Hypocrisy is the fuel that runs our society. So, someone, please, please tell us: where is that line?
I want to be environmentally responsible by conserving fuel.