By Chaseme, August 7, 2007 at 10:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If this catastrophe does not concern the bush administration, why did he go there?
If this catastrophe does not concern the bush administration, and could have been prevented by actions taken from the administration, why did he go there?
If this catastrophe does not have anything at all to do with the bush administration, and the bush administration has no responsibility whatsoever, why did he go there?
For the bush supporters and the bush huggers and the bush kissers and bush loversand the bush suckers, who claim bush had nothing to do with this, why did he go there?
By QuyTran, August 7, 2007 at 11:05 am Link to this comment
Hey GWB, thanks to your virtue and morality all disasters did happen one after one.
Report thisBy Chaseme, August 7, 2007 at 10:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If this catastrophe does not concern the bush administration, why did he go there?
If this catastrophe does not concern the bush administration, and could have been prevented by actions taken from the administration, why did he go there?
If this catastrophe does not have anything at all to do with the bush administration, and the bush administration has no responsibility whatsoever, why did he go there?
For the bush supporters and the bush huggers and the bush kissers and bush loversand the bush suckers, who claim bush had nothing to do with this, why did he go there?
Report thisBy James, August 7, 2007 at 6:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Man, that’s cold.
Report this