|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
Harry’s SetbackPosted on May 17, 2007By Mr. Fish
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
By D.A. Becker, November 12, 2007 at 11:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Aww… but he looks so cute in uniform…
Report thisBy Chaseme, May 18, 2007 at 8:50 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Notice the similarities with george and harry?
It’s possible that one day harry will lead the British with the same evil that george has used to putrefy America with?
The Royal family should take notice of what came of george when his family gave him a raincheck on his military committment and either send harry packing to Afganistan or send the booze and drugs packing to the trash can.
Certainly, the same as george, harry will choose the booze and drugs. Britian…we will see you at the bottom of the garbage pile, we (Americans) will be the ones snuggled next to the McDonalds wrappers.
Report thisBy Verne Arnold, May 18, 2007 at 8:19 am Link to this comment
Mr. Fish,
You’re a sick puppy…keep up the good work!
Report thisBy rage, May 18, 2007 at 8:13 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
So, at what point in Harry’s apologetic butt-kissing for his most recent over-the-top outrage did his Granny on his dad’s side decide that sending him to the dire fate of his late great mum to not be in the best interest of commonwealth of glorious Britainia? After all, imperial colonialism has been a British forte throughout recent centuries. Surely, the crown upon which the sun never sets has not reached her sate for the wealth and domination of other nations! Prime Ministers come and go to 10 Downing Street, a cycle that, so far, shows no soon coming changes toward ceasation. The current popularity of the Monarchy, though, is quite another story, however. I suspect the traggic loss in combat of this royal nazi pinheaded spare to the throne, with his penchant for Hitleresque attire and well-reported lust life, would have proven more damaging to Big Liz than any level of British participation in this unilateral pre-emptive atrocity to date.
Report thisBy The Eve, May 18, 2007 at 6:09 am Link to this comment
We gave up on Mesopotamia years ago and we still find it hard to believe that the PM was foolhardy enough to think that it was possible to succeed this time. Unfortunate that neither he nor Bush studied the history of the area..
Report thisBy rowdy, May 17, 2007 at 9:53 pm Link to this comment
sometimes i don’t get mr.fish’s cartoons.i always like his art work though. the one yesterday and the one today,suffer from no ambiguity.
Report thisBy vet240, May 17, 2007 at 8:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Are we now standing in the righteous pulpit preaching about the “badness” in killing innocent people?
Hogwash, we’ve killed 20 for every one the British have killed.
The British are to be pitied for having to accept a deal they couldn’t refuse from an idiot who is the lowest of the low in the history of this country.
If Britain had been the leader in this mess we wouldn’t be in Iraq throwing what little money we have left into that sand hole.
And for those who want to believe that there was and is some great plan by the Neo-cons. Forget it.
It was just a bunch of greedy treasonous thugs taking advantage of a dim-witted lazy, arrogant punk suffering from the fact he has a Father and Brother both of whom are better men than he could ever hope to be. He (bu$h jr.) put his energies in boozing, drugging and playing with other peoples money early in life. Not to mention his failure to serve the country in Vietnam.
Unlike America, Britain still has some semblance of self-respect remaining.
Report thisBy peedeecee, May 17, 2007 at 8:22 pm Link to this comment
Don’t worry about it - America long ago took over the British tradition of murdering brown people, and has moved onward to occupying their lands. Britain successfully passed the torch. (What, you thought the Statue of Liberty torch meant something else?)
Report thisBy QuyTran, May 17, 2007 at 6:11 pm Link to this comment
He is not “SOB” but Son-Of-Devils.
Pity for his Mother, Princess Diana who had been murdered by his monarch with long histoy of crimes !
Report thisBy James, May 17, 2007 at 4:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Nice cartoon.
Wait, is that evil in his eyes?
Report this