|
|
June 20, 2013
|
|
Robert Scheer and Chris Hedges on Class StrugglePosted on Nov 1, 2011
(Page 5) Chris Hedges: Oh, yeah, of course. I mean, Thomas Friedman becomes a kind of poster child for it, but it doesn’t matter; I mean, they all run in the same circle. That’s how you get news celebrities like Katie Couric pulling down salaries of $15 million. Katie Couric couldn’t write a story on deadline if she put a gun to her head. So yeah, it’s ... [laughs] I mean, I wrote a whole book on it. I mean, all of the pillars of a democracy and liberal institutions—I don’t mean that in an ideological sense, but institutions that once gave a voice to those outside the power elite, and made possible incremental or piecemeal reform, have been completely corrupted and bought off, including public education. I mean, look at what’s happened to Berkeley. So, yeah. And I think when we talk about a corporate coup ... it’s not incorrect, that every major system of power is either beholden to or wholly controlled by the corporate state—including, of course, our judiciary, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of corporate interests. Robert Scheer: Let me ask you a personal question, and then I’ll turn it over to Alan Minsky here at KPFK. I do want to remind people that you’ve agreed to be at a teach-in that they’re going to have at Occupy L.A. I’m going to be speaking there, Robert Reich is speaking there, it’s the weekend of Nov. 4 and 5. And so we’ll have great occasion to hear from you. Chris Hedges: I might be in jail on the 4th, but that’s all right. Robert Scheer: Well, then, that would be a legitimate ... Advertisement Robert Scheer: Oh, OK ... I’m sure the people at Occupy L.A. will forgive you for not being able to be there. But I want to ask you a personal question, because we’ve been running your—and we’re going to, by the way, be using your book as a way of promoting contributions to KPFK within this hour. And you know, I have been assuming this role; I don’t edit anything you write, but I’m the editor of Truthdig, and people constantly are asking me well, what drives Chris Hedges? And so forth. And I, in thinking about that, I think you are drawing upon an incredible wellspring of idealism and commitment and social justice in America. And in terms of your father’s example, and the tradition; we’ve had a lot of blather about religion, condemnation of religion, celebration of religion, one nation under God and everything. And it seems to me one of the clearer messages that comes from the three major religions certainly is a notion of social justice that condemns usury, Jesus overturning the tables of the money changers. And that whole message, which Martin Luther King drew upon, has been lost. And it seems to me you, having gone to divinity school, being the son of a preacher, you’ve revived that maybe more visibly than anyone else. Do you accept that, that you are kind of a prophetic voice in that respect, drawing on that tradition? Chris Hedges: Well, I don’t like the word prophetic, but I certainly come out of that tradition. And you know, I was trained as a preacher, and in many ways I act and write like one. I mean, the tragedy for me is that—and this isn’t just Christian—but I mean, look at the great tradition of social justice within Judaism, the alliances between major figures like Rabbi Abraham Heschel and others, and the civil rights movement. That unfortunately we saw a corruption of these monotheistic religions which have ended with this grotesque distortion, whether it’s with the Christian right and Jesus comes to make you rich and bless dropping iron fragmentation bombs all over the Middle East, or the state of Israel is elevated, you know, sanctified in whatever—it’s making a mockery of the great prophets, Amos, Isaiah. I think that unfortunately, we were probably always a minority within the church, but I think the chatter and noise of—I would call them heretics, these people who have hijacked religion for very nefarious ends, have just shut out, coupled with the fact that the liberal church itself has become sort of anemic and weak, and you know, lost membership. But it think that that kind of moral imperative—and it doesn’t have to be religious; I mean, Camus for me is a great figure—but that moral imperative to do right, to fight for justice whether you win or not, is something that is needed within every society to counterbalance all of those elements that are built around self-interest and self-gain.
1
2
3
4
5
Previous item: How Economic Inequality Harms Societies Next item: Occupy Wall Street Bares Its Soul New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By chacaboy, November 3, 2011 at 8:39 am Link to this comment
Though it does seem to affirm that the “vast majority” of your head is empty
space…;-)
Is there a moderator here to focus this conversation away from cheap shots? The
Report thissmiley face doesn’t really compensate…this is definitely the low road.
By Don Schneider, November 3, 2011 at 6:04 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Why do so many hate and fear mongers find their way to progressive sites such as
Report thisthis to smear their nastiness ? You would think they would feel more at home
commenting on rt. wing republican venues.
By ardee, November 3, 2011 at 5:08 am Link to this comment
Not so objective observer, November 2 at 2:48 pm
i’ll type slowly so you can keep up. 43% doesn’t make a majority.
Your comment, as dumb as a post, stated that it would appear that most of the commenters on this topic either commune only with like minded or totally ignore what the fact that the vast majority of the American public couldn’t care less about this “movement”.
Can you not even keep track of what you yourself post? I thought not. 43% approval would seem to negate your comment about “the vast majority of Americans”. Though it does seem to affirm that the “vast majority” of your head is empty space…;-)
Report thisBy D.R. Zing, November 2, 2011 at 5:24 pm Link to this comment
Interesting the talk in the interview about winning
over the rank and file police officers.
That is important. Police officers and their families
are bankrupted as frequently as anyone else in the
current financial system.
It’s also important to win over rank and file
journalists. Most journalists join their profession
because they bought into the myth that free speech
exists in the United States. The truth is free
speech exists for corporations and their owners, such
as Rupert Murdoch, but journalists have been largely
reduced to the role of heavily censored corporate
stenographers.
The sooner journalists realize the Occupy movement
could benefit their profession the better off the
movement will be.
—
objective observer:
Most of the people I know have seen a nuclear
detonation, which means at some rudimentary level
they must understand that our scientists penetrate
and even split the unseen and previously unknown.
Those scientists did not find souls and spirits; they
found subatomic particles.
Likewise, most of the people I know have flown in jets
and seen pictures the Hubble telescope has taken.
The people know the ancients believed the gods—and
God—were in the clouds. But the people don’t see
them when they fly in jets. And when they look at
Hubble pictures, they see the universe, with all its
stars and black holes, not the flawless kingdom of
the Bible.
And yet these same people still believe when they die
a spirit retaining all their memories and capable of
feeling sensations goes galavanting across the
universe.
And they twist themselves into mystical contortions to
convince themselves another dimension exists that is
indeed the heaven of the ancients.
And they believe when they close their eyes and talk
to themselves that the God of the ancients is
listening to their thoughts, and some of them even
believe that when their own thoughts echo back to
them what they are hearing are the words of God.
And some of these people believe the Occupy movement
is just a bunch of punks and hippies.
I don’t hold any of it against them. For I have
learned to live among them and I have compassion for
their unique form of mental retardation, brought on
by a childhood of intellectual abuse, that renders
them incapable of perceiving reality as it actually
exists.
Peace out, dude.
Report thisBy objective observer, November 2, 2011 at 2:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
ooo, cranky today, aren’t we Mr/Ms ardee. this is typical of the left wing of the political spectrum, name calling when one disagrees with you, not being able to compose a coherent response.
i’ll type slowly so you can keep up. 43% doesn’t make a majority. the people i interact with are what would be called by civilized folk as “middle Americans”. you know, common folk. for the record, i applaud the few objectives put forth by the occupiers, i just don’t believe that they will be achieved with their current method.
since you have no response except name calling and vile, i will regard this as a symptom of your lower mentality and await other, more thoughtful responses.
Report thisBy blogdog, November 2, 2011 at 2:31 pm Link to this comment
from the interview, near its closing - “...Exxon Mobile is not going to lavish you…”
of course not, exactly why it took NPR (National Propaganda Radio) 9 days to
start covering OWS
but let’s not stop there - what if Rockefeller, Ford, Soros Foundations,
et al, do lavish you, then what is expected? e.g.
Appalling Propaganda from Amy Goodman About Libya
Willy Loman - Scott Creighton
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2011 - http://tinyurl.com/3q5cddn
Amy Goodman of Democracy NOW! has become one of the most disingenuous
news figures this country has to offer and that’s saying a lot because there are
numbers of them. She is not worthy of your trust, she is not worth of your time,
she is not worthy of your respect… anymore. Such a sad legacy she now leaves
behind after a long and storied career as a dedicated teller of the truth in spite
of the power aligned against her. For whatever reason, she has become just
another presstitute in service of the globalists who are at this minute still
attacking the people of Libya, still bombing them and their infrastructure, still
laying siege to cities and populations who refuse to surrender to NATO powers,
and still planning how to dice up the people of Libya’s state assets to hand
them over to their favorite corporate contributors.
[...]
Report thisBy ardee, November 2, 2011 at 2:24 pm Link to this comment
Oh another one crawls out of the woodwork. They all shout ,“because I say so!” in their squeaky little cockroach voices.
objective observer, November 2 at 12:55 pm
in my profession, i talk to a lot of different people throughout the day.
As one might expect of a streetwalker…;-)
it would appear that most of the commenters on this topic either commune only with like minded or totally ignore what the fact that the vast majority of the American public couldn’t care less about this “movement”. most of the people i talk to consider these “occupiers” as either slackers or 60’s has beens or wannabes. until there is some unified message, demand or call to action, this event will simply be an annoyance.
...and there you have it, conclusive proof, not of the relative popularity of the OWS movement but of the sliminess of those who oppose it. Oh cockroach, CBS for one disagrees with your silly little poll. Polling your Johns, by the by, not really authentic.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20125515-503544/poll-43-percent-agree-with-views-of-occupy-wall-street/
October 25, 2011 6:30 PM
Report thisPoll: 43 percent agree with views of “Occupy Wall Street”
By Morpheus, November 2, 2011 at 2:09 pm Link to this comment
Memo to America: Stop waiting for Democrats and Republicans to save you. It’s bad for your health and your future. Can’t you tell? You have another choice -use it!
“WAKE UP PEOPLE!”
Read “Common Sense 3.1” at ( http://www.revolution2.osixs.org )
Enough talk, it’s time to get organized.
Report thisBy Dieter Heymann, November 2, 2011 at 2:03 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Sorry Mr. Scheer but the overturning of tables by Jesus, if that really happened, had absolutely nothing to do with social justice. For openers, these so-called money “changers” were not money changers but lenders of funds to people who did not have the money to buy a lamb that was to be slaughtered in the Temple at Easter. According to Jewish laws they were not allowed to demand interest although they probably had some ways to circumvent that law. They served a social purpose. Secondly, the so-called overturning was a religious not a social act by Jesus who held that the slaughter of lambs was a heathen and not a Jewish tradition.
Report thisBy objective observer, November 2, 2011 at 12:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
in my profession, i talk to a lot of different people throughout the day. it would appear that most of the commenters on this topic either commune only with like minded or totally ignore what the fact that the vast majority of the American public couldn’t care less about this “movement”. most of the people i talk to consider these “occupiers” as either slackers or 60’s has beens or wannabes. until there is some unified message, demand or call to action, this event will simply be an annoyance.
change comes only through the ballot box or the bullet box. if voted in, the elected quickly become what they campaigned against, and become the problem. if the latter, those that are calling the loudest for change will lose, since most of them wouldn’t know which end of the gun to point downrange, and are too anti second amendment to learn.
Report thisBy gerard, November 2, 2011 at 10:05 am Link to this comment
One thing we all need to understand better is what we mean, more precisely, when we say “they are clueless.” It is so commonly used for that everybody assumes it has content. It indicates, but the content is vague: Whata does “out of it” mean, exactly, “not aware of causing disaster”, “out to lunch”, “care-less” nnd—most important—how do people get that way and what’s the most effective thing to do about it, and how?
Report thisI know these questions seem boring and petty, but the psychology of “cluelessness” is very widely spread, not only among the rich, and in my opinion we need to seriously look into it. Probably we should all start with asking ourselves what we are “clueless” about, and why?
By felicity, November 2, 2011 at 9:39 am Link to this comment
There are written accounts of Russian elites (to the
manor born types) who literally starved to death in
their houses when the peasants on their estates
rebelled and deserted them during the Russian
Revolution of 1917.
Reminds me of Scarlett’s line in Gone With the Wind,
Report this“I’ll think about that tomorrow” when any threat to
their existence tomorrow is simply unthought of today.
By prisnersdilema, November 2, 2011 at 7:57 am Link to this comment
While occupying Wall Street don’t forget to occupy Conneticut…
Report thisBy D.R. Zing, November 2, 2011 at 7:49 am Link to this comment
“The hero of independent media…Bob Scheer.”
Report this—Chris Hedges
By D.R. Zing, November 2, 2011 at 7:47 am Link to this comment
This is an awesome interview. I recommend everyone
Report thislisten to it. Thank you, Truthdig, for posting it.
By D.R. Zing, November 2, 2011 at 7:29 am Link to this comment
Thomas Friedman is a walking conflict of interest.
Report thisBy D.R. Zing, November 2, 2011 at 7:27 am Link to this comment
“A lot of them are just stupid.” —Chris Hedges
Report thisBy D.R. Zing, November 2, 2011 at 7:17 am Link to this comment
Hell yes! Occupy the newsroom.
Report thisBy DonMidwest, November 2, 2011 at 6:07 am Link to this comment
An excellent summary of the class struggle that we are going through and the importance of OWS.
I worked to get Robert Scheer elected to congress and went door to door in the 1960’s in Oakland. I well recall the Oakland police turning us back in the anti war march of Oct 15, 1965.
These days, every system is broken down. The problems our country faces are systemic and have not been addressed by the political class nor of course the corporations who have been carrying out the Corporate cout d’ etat.
I sent this article out to my friends.
I live in the Columbus OH area these days and sent it to the local democratic club. They have been focused on stopping Gov Kasik and not taken the step beyond the democratic party as advocated in this interview.
Report thisBy ardee, November 2, 2011 at 5:50 am Link to this comment
Perhaps the most significant and in-depth discussion I have read in my two plus years here at TD.
This is worth, not only a read, but a re-read and some real thoughtful consideration of the several points made. Further it certainly shines the bright white light of truth and balance on the insinuations and clumsy efforts of the twin pillars of propaganda here; Ozark Michael and IMax, in their efforts to discredit OWS. That this need to slander is present shows plainly how important this movement really is and both infers a status on it and makes one wonder where we will go from here.
Report thisBy Outraged, November 2, 2011 at 12:31 am Link to this comment
“If you have a very large crowd shouting outside your
building, there might not be room for a safety net if
you’re the one tumbling down when it collapses.”
Lemony Snicket
Report thisBy gerard, November 1, 2011 at 9:53 pm Link to this comment
Wow! A very cogent and thorough summary of where we’re at and what a lot of us are about, all put forth through airing the personal views and wide experiences of Scheer and Hedges. I’m very glad to know more about where they are coming from and what they think our chances are. Hang in there, guys, and keep looking and listening, publishing and talking.
Report this