Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
Top Banner, Site wide
Apr 18, 2014

 Choose a size
Text Size

Top Leaderboard, Site wide

Star-Spangled Baggage
Science Finds New Routes to Energy




The Divide


Truthdig Bazaar
When I Was a Child I Read Books

When I Was a Child I Read Books

By Marilynne Robinson
$24.00

more items

 
A/V Booth

White House Faces Congress About Libya

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Mar 30, 2011
YouTube

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and others from the Obama administration finally dropped in on Capitol Hill on Wednesday to tell members of Congress what the deal is with the U.S.’ involvement in the Libyan uprising. Some on the receiving end of this belated debriefing weren’t having it—namely, many Republicans, as this Associated Press clip shows.  —KA

AP via YouTube:

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

D.R. Zing's avatar

By D.R. Zing, April 3, 2011 at 10:59 am Link to this comment

PatrickHenry nailed it.  The Constitution was written when there was no significant standing army to speak of. It was assumed a “well regulated militia” would help defend the country and that Congress would need to appropriate funds for each war. It’s why the second amendment states:  “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”  My emphasis. 

Congress granting permission for wars went out the window with the Cold War.  Congress has made half-hearted attempts to get the power back but to no avail (see War Powers Resolution of 1973).  The National Security Act of 1947, the huge defense budgets of the last fifty years, and national security rulings by courts essentially mean we are in a state of perpetual war.

So, yeah, like PatrickHenry said cutting the defense budget is the only solution.  The problem is the defense budget creates jobs and members of Congress receive campaign funding from defense contractors. It’s why both the elephants and the asses are loath to break the war machine.

But break it we must or we will be royally screwed. 

I would reach out to the Republican Tea Party here and say:  You were played as fools.  There is no crime in that. It happens to us all at one time or another.  But by keeping defense spending off the table, there is nothing—nothing—you can cut to significantly reduce the deficit.

If you want a reasonable tax rate, you must cut defense spending and you must change the country’s energy policy. That requires innovative thinking because you’ll need to rapidly divert some of the money that is currently spent on the military to rebuilding the nation’s infrastructure and to funding alternative forms of energy and transportation. If you don’t, the economy will go right in the crapper. Again. 

Are you up to it? Or do you just want to cripple the federal government and tear this country apart?  Is it your belief that all the federal government can do is put people in prison and fund wars? 

Step up.  They played you as fools but you’re in power now.  Use that power wisely and you can make fools out of those Republicans who misled and manipulated you.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, April 2, 2011 at 3:14 pm Link to this comment

In our new era of budget cutting, I believe the congress is now aware of the big slush fund of military money which allows the president to engage in the 60 days or less wars without their input.

We need to trim the US military budget by half, no more exorbent pensions give them all a 401K.

Report this

By BrunoDiderot, April 2, 2011 at 12:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Let me know when Chelsea (love-child of Hillary and Prince Charles) puts on a
uniform and heads out

Report this

By 1person, April 1, 2011 at 5:51 pm Link to this comment

A very interesting piece on why this American Muslim scholar did not support the US-Libyan intervention, from the start:
http://www.newislamicdirections.com/nid/print/why_i_oppose_the_us-led_intervention_in_libya

Report this
MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, March 31, 2011 at 11:07 am Link to this comment

More of the same Right-Wing fascist regime under a Left cloak.

Report this
MK Ultra's avatar

By MK Ultra, March 31, 2011 at 8:35 am Link to this comment

Oh, yeah.  I bet they’re scared now.

Report this

By glider, March 30, 2011 at 11:44 pm Link to this comment

what a sad joke

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.