|
|
May 24, 2013
|
|
|
|
 War Czar Gets a MakeoverPosted on Apr 20, 2007
The White House is having trouble finding someone to be the new “war czar,” and it has apparently decided the problem is the name. The position will now be called “execution manager.” Is it just us, or has this administration lost its flair for snazzy Orwellian lingo? Bonus: Jon Stewart catches Bush in a Advertisement Previous item: McCain’s Creepy Karaoke Next item: Hillary’s Downward Spiral New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery
Email 
Print
Share
Email to a friend
Newsletter 
Like Us
Follow Us
Get Our Feed
HOME|Digs|Reports|Arts & Culture|Uncovered|Ear to the Ground|A/V Booth|Cartoons
Tags|Bazaar|Podcast|About Us|Contact Us|User Agreement|Privacy Policy|FAQ: Comments and Moderation | Google+
Tags|Bazaar|Podcast|About Us|Contact Us|User Agreement|Privacy Policy|FAQ: Comments and Moderation | Google+
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
By Tim, April 24, 2007 at 9:22 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Czars
Why does the US government insist on naming czars for every damn thing? Why is every program called a “war on ... ” ? Why don’t we get it over with and start calling Bush “Czar George?”
Report thisBy SuGee, April 22, 2007 at 4:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Such good comments! I am amazed that George W. Bush, Dick R. Cheney, Alberto ((“I do not recall(Circa 1973), Richard Nixon’s impeachemnt and resignation.”)) Gonzales, Condoleeza (“Not my husband”: she is just so sad)Rice, Feb. 2001) and the rest of the criminals should be removed from the hallowed offices of the Executive Branch. Where do I sign up?
Regards,
Susan Gronemeyer
Report thisNevada City, Ca
By Reg Stocking, April 21, 2007 at 5:03 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
How about Ollie North? If we hadn’t wimped out because Congress turned off the money, we’d still be winning in Vietnam.
Report thisBy Hammo, April 20, 2007 at 2:03 pm Link to this comment
The Bush-Cheney administration has shown a history of not taking responsibility for the horrors resulting from their actions.
They have proven to be deceptive, dishonorable and incompetent. Americans are now realizing this more widely and deeply.
The “war czar” idea seems to tie in with these factors involving the Bush-Cheney bunch and their associates.
Maybe the tide is turning now for the warmongers, chicken hawks, neocons and war profiteers associated with Bush-Cheney. Americans seem to be thinking more critically about what has been going on in our country over the last years.
Food for thought at:
“Winds of change again blowing across America”
PopulistAmerica.com
April 20, 2007
http://www.populistamerica.com/winds_of_change_again_blowing_across_america
Report thisBy QuyTran, April 20, 2007 at 12:41 pm Link to this comment
How about reviving Don Rumsfeld ? He will surely be an excellent War Czar of all times.
Report this