Old-time mentalists and magii used to travel around the US making predictions about the future.  Their “amazing” abilities were mostly founded in making contradictory predictions in different geographic places so they could claim accuracy in one place and ignore their failures in others.  Ordinary people tend to remember when the magician gets an incredible prediction correct - and forget when the trick goes a little sour. 

O’Reilly and others like him ramble on and on like the Oracle at Delphi or the enigmatic truisms of the Yi Ching.  He pats himself on the back when he can twist a few of his quips into being “correct” - and never refers to the ocean of mistakes he did elsewhere.  Has anyone actually refuted Erik Van Daniken’s stuff yet ?

Face it:  Faux Snooze is an entertainment medium - “news” is merely an accidental by-product.

Here’s my prediction du jour: 
A human female will some day give birth to the offspring of an extraterrestrial alien. 

(Take THAT, Nostradamus !)

I need Obamacare now, because listening to Mr. O’Reilly makes me sick.