|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
‘Left, Right & Center’: Third Party PoliticsPosted on Dec 30, 2011
Does America need a third political party? The backlash against Obama on the left and the tepid support for Romney (the “anyone but Romney” vote has gone from Bachmann to Perry to Cain to Gingrich) would seem to make this a fine time for an independent party to emerge. Tune in to this edition of “Left, Right & Center” to hear what Robert Scheer, Matt Miller, Arianna Huffington and Matthew Continetti have to say as they hold forth on this evergreen topic in American politics. KCRW: Advertisement Previous item: Syrian Activist Speaks Out From Hiding as Arab League Mission Fails to Slow Deadly Crackdown Next item: Zuccotti at Midnight on the Eve New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By febo, January 3, 2012 at 3:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This article touches the real truth - the ones who most fear the ACTUAL 3rd party - ie Ron Paul - are liberals/progressives/democrats.
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/progressives_and_the_ron_paul_fallacies/singleton/
- Progressives and the Ron Paul fallacies, Glen Greenwald
I would go further than this article - when Obama stands up and makes jokes about sending drones to get little boys - as he did last year, with no thought for the innocents who have been killed by drones, or thier grieving families, we have an insight into some kind of mental disorder, a gasp inducing schizophrenia, right at the top of the political hierarchy, extendind down into the liberal media.
That’s why this show, and the media associated with its participants blanks Ron Paul.
Report thisI do feel for you, but I wonder why it is so difficult to contemplate voting for Ron Paul. If you spend a week or so watching the extended interviews and speeches of Ron Paul you will find all of the petty accusations thrown at Paul are baseless. (It appears Greenwald himself has not done this.)
By Outraged, January 2, 2012 at 1:56 am Link to this comment
Hands down, Mr. Scheer he is overwhelmingly correct when he says the media needs to air the grievances of the people. The “common”, “hits everyone the same”, type of basic outrage the people are experiencing.
Where is it..? I challenge you (the commentators), show me where it is? If you don’t hear me…, if you don’t make certain I am counted, how will I(the everyman) be heard? If I am not heard, why would anything change? The everyman is where the power lies.
Pundits/commentators don’t matter…they don’t move people…what they do with what they have does….and you can’t get that out of your head…you have to go to the people…then use your head and be that voice.
(it seems to me that journalists at times get caught up in themselves and forget what the real measure of their value is…..the real measure is priceless….it also appears that somehow you’ve all been trained to talk for and to us, instead of learning how to listen….you’re not here to solve the problem….you’re here to air it.)
People move people. Move the people, move the country, move the country, move the politics.
Report thisBy SteveL, December 31, 2011 at 10:34 pm Link to this comment
It must be political parties that are in need of new direction? How about the newspaper TV, radio and news industry where Matt Miller works? Anyone happy with their performance in the last 50 years? This news industry has been a cheer leader for unless wars, given the politicians cover for just about everything except sex scandals, and refused to ask questions for fear of upsetting politicians. There is Fox phone tapping, lies, distortions and omissions, hiring oblivious nut cases to put out the news, and being run by an Australian immigrant that never took a citizenship test. The rest of the networks are just subtle versions of Fox. If the news industry where Matt Miller works did anything resembling their jobs we would have a lot fewer of the problems Matt likes to gripe about.
Report thisBy gerard, December 31, 2011 at 7:24 pm Link to this comment
How about an R + D Party, with Kucinich for Pres. and Ron Paul for VP, or vice versa. Throw out the entire House of Representatives and replace them with
Report thisequal number of female and male members of National OWS. Recess the Supremes for five years, with pay. Free more than half those in prison, beginning with those sentenced for possession of drugs, and minor offenses. Rehabilitate the rest. Eliminate all torture and the death penalty. Start Over. Cancel all defense contracts. Free all armed forces members, destroy all atomic weapons and drones, convert all military planes and ships to civilian and commercial transportation. Educate everybody. Put WikiLeaks in charge of public information. etc. etc. Start the New Year Right!
By and01570, December 31, 2011 at 2:54 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
robert makes the program worth listening too. Matt seems to promote corporation power to much. If you care about edu in this country raisng teacher pay would be great and trying to get higher scoring students into the profession is a good start. Sadly if one takes a class on sociology of education a lot of the success and failure we attribute to student achievement is found in the home/neighborhood. I firmly suggest reading the infamous coleman 1960s report.66 i believe. It tells us that a students family background has a great influence on student starting points and progress. We also have incredible wealth/income disparities, these inequalities create/influence-correlate to student success/failure. Put in another way schools are a way of allocating the community.
Report thisBy ardee, December 31, 2011 at 12:23 pm Link to this comment
Of course we need a third party, perhaps even a fourth or a fifth. The two parties we now have are locked in a battle between themselves, a battle for corporate funds and one that leaves we the people out in the cold.
The nation that has, for example, the best health care for its citizens is France. That nation also has a plethora of political parties vying for “market share” in its governance. With several parties involved in writing legislation etc. one avoids what we have now, a dysfunctional government with one party saying no to everything and the other having no clue about anything. Even if we didn’t have a President verging on incompetence , which we certainly do, there are not enough interests being supported to get anything done.
Report thisBy kitpw, December 31, 2011 at 11:20 am Link to this comment
This bunch spent half an hour discussing the idea of a third party as a corrective to the takeover of our government by moneyed interests. It was a start. Not a moment was spent addressing the increasing irrelevance of our Bill of Rights as a reason to look to a third party. No mention was made of present-day third parties and their candidates, such as the Justice Party and Rocky Anderson.
Report thisBy Sister Lauren, December 31, 2011 at 8:41 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
All I Want For Christmas Is Change I Can Believe In
http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/753524/all_i_want_for_christmas_i
s_change_i_can_believe_in/comments/
The Giving Season: Why the 99% Are Actually More Philanthropic Than the 1%
Report thishttp://www.alternet.org/story/153560/the_giving_season:_why_the_99_are_ac
tually_more_philanthropic_than_the_1/comments/