LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 23, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Obama Heckled During Speech, Warren Lands a Book Deal, and More

A Call to Action

Terracide and the Terrarists: Destroying the Planet for Record Profits

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Mission on Climate Change

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Heart of Darkness

Heart of Darkness

By Joseph Conrad

The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy

The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy

By John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt
$26.00

more items

 
A/V Booth

‘Left, Right & Center’: Third-Party Politics

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Nov 25, 2011
kcrw.com

Does America need a third political party? The backlash against Obama on the left and the tepid support for Romney would seem to make this a fine time for an independent party to emerge. But it’s also the year of $1 billion campaigns and Citizens United-style funding schemes. Is there any escape from the two-party system?

This topic frames the discussion on the Black Friday edition of “Left, Right & Center,” once again featuring the verbal stylings of Arianna Huffington, plus regulars Robert Scheer and Matt Miller and special guest Matthew Continetti, subbing for Tony Blankley on the right.  —KA

KCRW:

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By ardee, November 29, 2011 at 3:50 am Link to this comment

SteveL, November 28 at 11:43 am

Ahh how clever. I now see that you are about fourteen years old and trying desperately to play with the adults.

Try harder.

Report this

By SteveL, November 28, 2011 at 12:43 pm Link to this comment

Yeah Ardee my posts are as garbled as your ideas.

Report this
screamingpalm's avatar

By screamingpalm, November 28, 2011 at 6:17 am Link to this comment

Edit my last: I see no reason for the Greens NOT to run…

meh it’s late and I’m tired, sorry for the double post

Report this
screamingpalm's avatar

By screamingpalm, November 28, 2011 at 6:16 am Link to this comment

@ ardee

Absolutely. SteveL lost me with that last post. I see no reason for the Greens to run in both local and national elections. In fact I fully support that (as you probably already know).

Report this

By ardee, November 28, 2011 at 5:52 am Link to this comment

screamingpalm, November 27 at 3:24 pm

You are entitled to your opinion of garbled posts that continue to deny the reality of what the Greens are trying to accomplish.

You are correct, in my opinion, about the governments of Europe and their more representative governance. But that is the goal of third party politics here is it not!

Report this

By ardee, November 28, 2011 at 4:00 am Link to this comment

SteveL, November 27 at 8:07 pm

You continue to criticize the Greens for not doing exactly what it is that they ARE doing. Why? I haven’t the foggiest notion, bad day for cartoons on TV?

Report this

By SteveL, November 27, 2011 at 9:07 pm Link to this comment

Most learn how to walk before they know how to run.  However third parties love to make the insane mistake of doing the same thing over and over again only to have the same result. 

When Gavin Newsom first ran for San Francisco Mayor he was tailing in the poles behind a Green Party candidate.  Good move for the Greens!  This shook up the Democrats to the point where ex-President Clinton flew across the country and campaigned for Newsom and helped him win.  Why?  San Francisco mayors go on to other higher offices.  Dianne Feinstein now a Senator and Newsom is now Lieutenant governor.  Lesson:  Start small and bigger things can come.

Report this
screamingpalm's avatar

By screamingpalm, November 27, 2011 at 4:24 pm Link to this comment

I think what SteveL is trying to say, is that in Europe the parliamentary system is much more representative of the people where all political parties have at least some sort of presence, whereas our “winner-take-all” is much less so. I certainly agree with that.

Report this

By ardee, November 27, 2011 at 4:19 pm Link to this comment

SteveL, November 27 at 11:07 am

I would love to comment on this effort of yours but there is nothing there to comment upon.

Report this

By SteveL, November 27, 2011 at 12:07 pm Link to this comment

Ardee do yours.  You don’t have to look any further than Europe to see what works vs.
here for what doesn’t,t

Report this

By ardee, November 27, 2011 at 4:19 am Link to this comment

SteveL, November 26 at 10:08 pm

Do the research, Steve. The Green Party runs a candidate for President only because national recognition is a necessary ingredient in the building of that party. Its primary focus has been on ballot access, which the Duopoly Party tries to lock up tight in an act of self preservation. That fight is being won with more and more ballot access in each election cycle, and more and more candidates on local and state levels as well.

The real effect of the Green Party can be seen in the confederacy of dunces who appear to denigrate its successes and the need for its existence.

Report this

By SteveL, November 26, 2011 at 11:08 pm Link to this comment

Third parties are a great idea.  They just cannot start at the top and waste time, money and energy running for President.  If they cannot come with the votes in one state to capture a Senate seat in one state how will they be President?

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, November 26, 2011 at 9:58 pm Link to this comment

Re: screamingpalm

Your comment: “That’s the Democratic party’s
rhetoric.”

I disagree, my experience is this is true of people
in general but especially true of certain personality
types regardless of their political affiliation. Btw,
I think Paul would be a disaster, but the Republicans
won’t let him run because it would take votes from
them rather than from the Democrats.

There is just a certain swath of folks who do inane
things and that’s all there is to it, like these:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkywyGoQ2yU&feature=player_embedded

I imagine these folks are from both sides (and in-between) of the
political spectrum and they too vote. You betcha.

Report this
screamingpalm's avatar

By screamingpalm, November 26, 2011 at 9:20 pm Link to this comment

@ Outraged

That’s the Democratic party’s rhetoric. You see that sort of defeatism/pragmatism with many TD’ers here.

Meanwhile on the Right, Libertarian Ron Paul is doing pretty well for himself. He probably won’t get the nomination, but that sure would make things interesting!

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, November 26, 2011 at 8:44 pm Link to this comment

While a third party could influence decisions made in
the other parties, they certainly won’t win the
presidency and I doubt any offices in Congress. It’s
just wishful thinking.

I challenge those who believe there is viability to a
third party to walk down the street and ask random
people what a third party is (could they name a third party?) and what the platform would have to be for them to ACTUALLY vote for it.

People like to piss and moan but in actuality few
will act upon their own rhetoric. On the other hand however, they are likely to amass around an issue. (Americans like ISSUES, they seem safer and they’re also very Oprah and Donahue-like, more familiar and easier… I guess) Most people are creatures of habit and will stay that way until the day they die.

Half of the people probably couldn’t tell you who the vice-president is, but they’ll vote anyway. If a third party is supposedly currently pertinent why aren’t the masses demanding it?

IMO, to force change - movements should mobilize and focus on issues (it’s more conducive to our nature), especially popular ones, be they political or social. Politically, an amendment to undo Citizen’s United would be popular across the ideological spectrum, so would measures effecting accountability on Wall Street, taxing the rich and protecting Social Security, as well as the Post Office, schools, libraries and measures to decrease the influence of money in politics. But then this is not news is it…....

I doubt that a third party candidate who supported even these popular political ideas could garner measurable support, I do, however, think a mainstream candidate with these same ideals would.

Report this

By Alan, November 26, 2011 at 3:03 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well, we have a third party, The Green Party.
Some Texans think Texas is the third party, but
they’d be wrong, wrong as their candidate, Ron Paul.
Y’all should understand this ‘bout Texans:
they’re like gila monsters,
when they’re wrong they get ornery,
an’ when they’re really, really wrong,
they get more ornery,
so ornery as t’ make the casual observer mistake
sheer orneriness
f’r rightful conviction. 
The Texan state critter IS the gila monster,
ain’t it?

Report this

By stdnt4lyf, November 26, 2011 at 11:24 am Link to this comment

First things first.In the blurb on the home page mentioned a third party run in an atmosphere of 1 billion dollar campaigns.Its pretty obvious that the first thing that has to be done,has to be done first is to get the money out of politics.Public funding will make law makers more responsive to the the folks who pay their salaries (right now its the corps).There is no way right now a third party is going to be viable with Citizens United along with the policies implemented after Perot’s run at the Presidency.

Report this

By David, November 26, 2011 at 11:05 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Today we need a third party,Republicans are strickly for the wealthy,linking wealth to jobs falsely knowing if they invest itll be in foreign countrys,showing no regard forthe american dream and pretending to believe in God,Democrats are very simpithetic with workers and the american dream,but lack moral turpitude,demonstrating rights of criminals above victums,seek to comfort peoples with questionable morals and standards of living.

Report this

By Eville Mike, November 26, 2011 at 11:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Somebody really needs to shoot this program in the head and spare us all
the high-blown platitudes, and get these preening dipwads to spend just a
tiny moment out of the academic bubble they’re trapped in, and get ‘em to
walk around in the world where the actual problems are - where the actual
people are.

Three elitists pissin’ and moanin’ about elitism - and one ‘lefty” shouting at
the wind.

Report this

By febo, November 26, 2011 at 6:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I always listen to this show to monitor how Ron Paul is blanked not only by “the mainstream” but also by the “independent/progressive/alternative/superior” media.

Robert Scheer has mentioned Ron Paul in recent weeks, but he’s gone quiet again. I simply can’t fathom how an entire section on a “3rd voice” can bypass this great man.

Is is deliberate? Or is there something unconscious going on? Some kind of cognitive dissonance, another instance of bubble psychology? Or is it categorical laziness - you can’t be bothered to reformulate the old dividing lines?

Ron Paul is NOT the Republican party (or, as he would say, the republican party is not the republican party). Ron Paul IS the alternative. If you disagree, please refute me.

I am particularly angered by the Huff Post in blanking Ron Paul - every time I go to the 2012 election section, just looking at the photos, he’s never there, despite being an intellectual and philosophical force that literally towers above his rivals. Ariana Huffington in my view, is a therefore sellout and a hypocrit. I’ve seen her on TV in the past agreeing with Ron Paul.

Let, Right and Center, and Ron Paul.

Report this

By ardee, November 26, 2011 at 3:45 am Link to this comment

Err, one billion dollar campaigns are yet another reason why third party politics is essential to the restoration of our democratic system.

Report this
Egomet Bonmot's avatar

By Egomet Bonmot, November 25, 2011 at 10:55 pm Link to this comment

Wow, great episode guys—let’s hear it for prerecorded shows!

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.