|
|
May 24, 2013
|
|
Kucinich, Hedges, Nader Rally at the White HousePosted on Dec 13, 2009
A who’s who of opponents of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan spoke at a rally at Lafayette Park, across the street from the White House, on Saturday. Chris Hedges, Ralph Nader, Rep. Dennis Kucinich and more after the jump. Rep. Dennis Kucinich: Chris Hedges: Ralph Nader: More speakers and videos from the rally can be found here. Advertisement The World As It Is:Dispatches on the Myth of Human Progress
Previous item: ‘Left, Right & Center’: Obama’s Nobel Speech; Blackwater + CIA; Bank Bonuses Next item: Re-Volt-ing Dance Could Make You Go Blind New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Ed Harges, December 16, 2009 at 4:44 pm Link to this comment
Any strategy for ending the insane belligerence of US foreign policy that fails to adopt,
as job number one, breaking the back of Israel’s political power in the US, is laughably
inadequate.
Israel’s power is the only piece of the war-policy machine that guarantees the support,
or at least the meek submission, of so many “anti-war”, “liberal” politicians,
journalists, and intellectuals. This is the element that guarantees that we will never
have the votes, even when “liberals” are in power, to change these insane policies.
The historical association of American Jews with the left, the preponderance of Jews in
positions of power, the taboo against pointing out a glaring and passionately
combative attachment to a foreign power (even among so many Jews who are
supposedly liberal), and the conventional equation of opposition to Israel with anti-
Semitism — all these factors prevent liberals and the left from ever being able to
muster a coherent opposition to the war machine.
Squawk all you want about the power of Big Oil or even the Military Industrial Complex
Report this— they have nothing like the almost magical power of Israel’s minions to shut us all up
and compel obedience. Israel’s devotees are the only constituency whose power cannot
safely even be mentioned by anyone who wants to keep any sort of influential
position in public life.
By radson, December 16, 2009 at 2:47 pm Link to this comment
First of all I would like to thank Dennis Kucinich ,Cynthia McKinney ,Chris Hedges and all the folks that showed-up for the event ;I am proud of your courage and resolve.The movement must start somewhere and
though it is in it’s infancy at the moment ,it must be pursued and no doubt with perseverance it will grow.This movement requires that the Grassroots put aside their Fear and replace it with Faith.Faith in oneself,
Faith in the children and Faith in thy neighbor,for fear itself is a condition of Ice a freezing of the senses,whilst Faith offers a clearing of the mind and an opportunity to smite fear and challenge the regression which it attempts to impose.During the Viet-nam War the American people were subject to a vast array of emotional avenues;most protesters were demonstrating against the war ,which in turn led many to criticize the soldiers of which many were conscripts ,others found inspiration in the music of the times ,and others found illumination through drugs but very few if any challenged the Corporatist equation at the time .Many considered Mai Lai to be the epiphany towards ostracizing the soldiers that were sent overseas to do the bidding of the State,while neglecting to understand that big business was uncorking the Champagne bottles
at the time because the blame was now squarely on the soldiers shoulders.Thankfully that is not the case today,but the dubious laws implemented by Dabya and Dick against the law abiding citizens of America and other Nations to protect and promote their Corporate Ideology leaves the populace in a virtual Grey zone of uncertainty and undermines the Constitutional rights of American citizens.This battle for rights is
not America’s and her peoples alone ,it has become a Global struggle and there are Allies in many countries that are opposing this form of assimilation ,I guess you could call it the other Coalition of the willing and
it definitely will require a concerted effort to change the tide,but it has to start somewhere and why not in America.
here is a little inspiration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgmM0SR_R_k
Report thisBy jean Gerard, December 16, 2009 at 12:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
All the historical, pseudo-religious clap-trap about “Just Wars”—phooey!
Time now to turn the page on history and on religious claptrap and bring forth
some Saint Justice to knock off a set of obvious conclusions after two or three
disastrous wars and invent a Theory of Just Peace.
Let it contain rules in support of nonmilitary ethics that make war a crime
against humanity. Let it contain the testimonies of all soldiers who fell in
battles of the past, saying “If I had it to do over, I’d never have joined up. War is
illegitimate. It is a betrayal of the human spirit. It does far more harm than
good. Peace offers the only serious prospect for survival. Go for it!”
The Theory should contain provisions for punishment when wars involving
more than 100 people or cost more than $1000 dollars “break out” through
negligence or neglect, due to the fact that arguments were not taken to
negotiators in early stages of dispute. A system for settlement of disputes
could be organized, and would be accepted after people got accustomed to
using them .
If necessary to give the Theory of Just Peace some “mystical clout” similar to the
hoopla surrounding the “Just War Theory”, let nations appoint some honorable
men and women representing Church and State to sign an international
constitution setting up the Principles of Peace and calling themselves “Royal
Knights of Human Common Sense.”
Well, you get the idea. Spelling out additional details is unnecessary here.
Report thisJust the idea, floating around in the electronic atmosphere, could give it
credence and strength, and who knows .......? The time may be now, when the
whole world realizes we have been snookered for too long by You Know What.
By M.B.S.S., December 15, 2009 at 11:18 pm Link to this comment
thank you, Cynthia Mckinney.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, December 15, 2009 at 3:12 pm Link to this comment
By Cynthia_McKinney, December 14 at 6:06 pm #
Very impressive, I work in Washington DC and didn’t hear anything about this rally.
103.5 WTOP is a zionist shill reporting agency, content with brainwashing our federal workers daily.
Report thisNothing like this would be reported until a week later.
By jean Gerard, December 15, 2009 at 2:07 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
In my previous comment I neglected to emphasize an important point:
The milieu of political protest has been much changed for the worse by all the
special presidential orders invented and injected into the “justice” system by
Bush/Cheney—I mean the restrictive provisions based on fear and hysteria in
the Patriot Act, the elimination of habeas corpus etc., arrest without warrant
etc., —all of which pushed citizen protest over into the “might-be-terrorist”
category and made it vulnerable to suspicion and prosecution.
Rumors of “campsites” run by military contractors here and there in the
boonies has put further pressure on those who might demonstrate in order to
achieve government attention to their rightful needs, opinions and insights.
The result is that those special rulings limited our Constitutional rights—
rights that were adopted deliberately to help ordinary people to “provide for
the common defense, promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of
liberty for ourselves and our posterity.” . It is these special Bush/Cheney
rulings that must be cancelled—should have already been recalled. Until they
are, we ordinary people, will be deprived of our legal, moral and constitutional
rights.
The fact that these restrictions are still on the books is an indication of the
abject irresponsibility of our Congress and Judiciary, not to mention a
presidency that pretends to support “hope” and “change”.
It is gravely dangerous that most people are not aware of those special
Report thisadministrative rulings, their content, the fact that they remain in force, and are
definitely related to citizens’ rights.
By nickmammano, December 15, 2009 at 6:33 am Link to this comment
Cynthia McKinney for President!
Report thisBy Hugh Esco, December 15, 2009 at 12:41 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
<center>
Report this<object width=“580” height=“360”><param name=“movie” value=“http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/60U_AlCim9A&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1”></param></param></param><embed src=“http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/60U_AlCim9A&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1” type=“application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=“always” allowfullscreen=“true” width=“580” height=“360”></embed></object>
</center>
Joined on the stage by her son Coy McKinney, who took a break in his law studies to address this rally, Cynthia McKinney, Georgia Green and 2008 Presidential Nominee of the Green Party of the United States, spoke at a rally in Washington DC in response to the Obama Administration’s decision to escalate the pipeline war in Afghanistan left to them by the Bush Administration.
By colin2626262, December 15, 2009 at 12:19 am Link to this comment
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRobryliBLQ
Report thisBy colin2626262, December 14, 2009 at 11:39 pm Link to this comment
(Sorry I posted it three times. I wanted to correct the typos.)
This is the speech I would’ve given if I’d been there on Saturday:
Chris Hedges is right. It doesn’t matter if we’re in the minority. It doesn’t matter if we have a small crowd here today. As long as someone is here, even one person, we know we’re in the right, and we can live with ourselves. What if we didn’t speak out? Like Chris said, what if we just follow along because it’s safe that way? Then we’re no better. We’re no better than the ones who make the wars. We wage the wars for them with our silence. But that’s why we’re here today. We refuse to be silent.
Our President, Mr. Obama, just won the Nobel Peace Prize. It’s supposed to be a great prize, you know. The highest honor humanity can bestow apparently. And I listened to—well, no, I didn’t listen to his speech. I read the text. I couldn’t bear to listen to that man, with his soaring rhetoric. No doubt he’s well intentioned. He wants to keep the country safe. He thinks—and I really believe he’s sincere—he thinks the terrorists are out to get us and that they’re gonna come get us from Afghanistan and Pakistan. And so we gotta stop ‘em, before they come kill us. He likens the terrorists, the extremists, the ... Muslims, to Nazis. Of course, it’s just the fundamentalist, violent Muslims he’s out to get—not the average Muslims who keep quiet, or who don’t take up arms against our arms.
And why is he out to get them? Why is America still engaged in the war on terror? They attacked us on September 11. They’re going to attack us again unless we occupy their countries and kill ‘em all. Yep, we gotta kill ‘em all. That’s the only way we’ll be safe. This is what Mr. Obama spoke about at West Point. And this was the basic justification for war that he gave in his Nobel address. Sometimes war is necessary, he said. We have to see the world as it is, not as we’d like it to be. We have to realize there’s evil in the world, and war is actually a part of God’s plan, because humanity is flawed, and sinful, and sometimes, in Mr. Obama’s words, unable to act within the bounds of reason.
But is it reasonable to believe that this war against the extremist Muslims, the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11, is going to turn out well for us? Everyone with any sense, any reason, knows that we’re simply creating more terrorists by the second, every second we have our troops occupying their countries, killing their people, men, women, and, yes, children too. Who is Mr. Obama to talk about the Nazis in his Nobel address? Yes, the United States kills children just like the Nazis did. Our killing isn’t intentional. Now, I’m not a moral philosopher, but I think intention and action are pretty much the same thing. They equal the same thing. Maybe you didn’t intend to kill, but you still did kill. Maybe you think your killing is for a good cause, for self defense, or national security. But it’s still killing. And don’t think God is going to pay attention to the nuances of your intentions. It’s your actions that will be judged.
I’m speaking to you, Mr. Obama. You want to quote from Martin Luther King and bring up the holy name of Gandhi in your Nobel speech? That’s fine. It’s good to look up to them. But don’t sully their names with your justifications for war. You’re not Gandhi, Mr. Obama. You’re also not Jesus Christ. You may be very powerful, but your kingdom is of this world.
I’ll end by saying this: nonviolence may lead to failure. Look, Jesus suffered and was crucified on a cross by the Roman state. But how many people, about to celebrate Christmas, think Jesus Christ failed? He wasn’t a failure. His killers were failures. Sure, they lived, and he died. But life is not as important as truth. And truth, my friends, is love.
God bless you and God help America. Thanks.
Report thisBy colin2626262, December 14, 2009 at 11:31 pm Link to this comment
This is the speech I would’ve given if I’d been there on Saturday:
Chris Hedges is right. It doesn’t matter if we’re in the minority. It doesn’t matter if we have a small crowd here today. As long as someone is here, even one person, we know we’re in the right, and we can live with ourselves. What if we didn’t speak out? Like Chris said, what if we just follow along because it’s safe that way? Then we’re no better. We’re no better than the ones who make the wars. We wage the wars for them with our silence. But that’s why we’re here today. We refuse to be silent.
Our President, Mr. Obama, just won the Nobel Peace Prize. It’s supposed to be a great prize, you know. The highest honor humanity can bestow apparently. And I listened to—well, no, I didn’t listen to his speech. I read the text. I couldn’t bear to listen to that man, with his soaring rhetoric. No doubt he’s well intentioned. He wants to keep the country safe. He thinks—and I really believe he’s sincere—he thinks the terrorists are out to get us and that they’re gonna come get us from Afghanistan and Pakistan. And so we gotta stop ‘em, before they come kill us. He likens the terrorists, the extremists, the ... Muslims, to Nazis. Of course, it’s just the fundamentalist, violent Muslims he’s out to get—not the average Muslims who keep quiet, or who don’t take up arms against our arms.
And why is he out to get them? Why is America still engaged in the war on terror? They attacked us on September 11. They’re going to attack us again unless we occupy their countries and kill ‘em all. Yep, we gotta kill ‘em all. That’s the only way we’ll be safe. This is what Mr. Obama spoke about at West Point. And this was the basic justification for war that he gave in his Nobel address. Sometimes war is necessary, he said. We have to see the world as it is, not as we’d like it to be. We have to realize there’s evil in the world, and war is actually a part of God’s plan, because humanity is flawed, and sinful, and sometimes, in Mr. Obama’s words, unable to act within the bounds of reason.
But is it reasonable to believe that this war against the extremist Muslims, the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11, is going to turn out well for us? Everyone with any sense, any reason, knows that we’re simply creating more terrorists by the second, every second we have our troops occupying their countries, killing their people, men, women, and, yes, children too. Who is Mr. Obama to talk about the Nazis in his Nobel address? Yes, the United States kills children just like the Nazis did. Our killing isn’t intentional. Now, I’m not a moral philisopher, but I think intention and action are pretty much the same thing. They equal the same thing. Maybe you didn’t intend to kill, but you still did kill. Maybe you think your killing is for a good cause, for self defense, or national security. But it’s still killing. And don’t think God is going to pay attention to the nuances of your intentions. It’s your actions that will be judged.
I’m speaking to you, Mr. Obama. You want to quote from Martin Luther King and bring up the holy name of Gandhi in your Nobel speech? That’s fine. It’s good to look up to them. But don’t sully their names with your justifications for war. You’re not Gandhi, Mr. Obama. You’re also not Jesus Christ. You may be very powerful, but your kingdom is of this world.
I’ll end by saying this: nonviolence may lead to failure. Look. Jesus suffered and was crucified on a cross by the Roman state. But how many people, about to celebrate Christmas, think Jesus Christ failed? He wasn’t a failure. His killers were failures. Sure, they lived, and he died. But life is not as important as truth. And truth, my friends, is love.
God bless you and God help America. Thanks.
Report thisBy colin2626262, December 14, 2009 at 11:25 pm Link to this comment
This is the speech I would’ve given if I’d been there on Saturday:
Chris Hedges is right. It doesn’t matter if we’re in the minority. It doesn’t matter if we have a small crowd here today. As long as someone is here, even one person, we know we’re in the right, and we can live with ourselves. What if we didn’t speak out? Like Chris said, what if we just follow along because it’s safe that way? Then we’re no better. We’re no better than the ones who make the wars. We wage the wars for them with our silence. But that’s we’re here today. We refuse to be silent.
Our President, Mr. Obama, just won the Nobel Peace Prize. It’s supposed to be a great prize, you know. The highest honor humanity can bestow apparently. And I listened to—well, no, I didn’t listen to his speech. I read the text. I couldn’t bear to listen to that man, with his soaring rhetoric. No doubt he’s well intentioned. He wants to keep the country safe. He thinks—and I really believe he’s sincere—he think the terrorists are out to get us and that they’re gonna come get us from Afghanistan and Pakistan. And so we gotta stop ‘em, before they come kill us. He likens the terrorists, the extremists, the ... Muslims, to Nazis. Of course, it’s just the fundamentalist, violent Muslims he’s out to get—not the average Muslims who keep quiet, or who don’t take up arms against our arms.
And why is he out to get them? Why is America still engaged in the war on terror? They attacked us on September 11. They’re going to attack us again unless we occupy their countries and kill ‘em all. Yep, we gotta kill ‘em all. That’s the only way we’ll be safe. This is what Mr. Obama spoke about at West Point. And this was the basic justification for war that he gave in his Nobel address. Sometimes war is necessary, he said. We have to see the world as it is, not as we’d like it to be. We have to realize there’s evil in the world, and war is actually a part of God’s plan, because humanity is flawed, and sinful, and sometimes, in Mr. Obama’s words, unable to act within the bounds of reason.
But is it reasonable to believe that this war against the extremist Muslims, the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11, is going to turn out well for us? Everyone with any sense, any reason, knows that we’re simply creating more terrorists by the second, every second we have our troops occupying their countries, killing their people, men, women, and, yes, children too. Who is Mr. Obama to talk about the Nazis in his Nobel address. Yes, the United States kills children just like the Nazis did. Our killing isn’t intentional. Now, I’m not a moral philisopher, but I think intention and action are pretty much the same thing. They equal the same thing. Maybe you didn’t intend to kill, but you still did kill. Maybe you think your killing is for a good cause, for self defense, or national security. But it’s still killing. And don’t think God is going to pay attention to the nuances of your intentions. It’s your actions that will be judged.
I’m speaking to you, Mr. Obama. You want to quote from Martin Luther King and bring up the holy name of Gandhi in your Nobel speech? That’s fine. It’s good to look up to them. But don’t sully their names with your justifications for war. You’re not Gandhi, Mr. Obama. You’re also not Jesus Christ. You may be very powerful, but your kingdom is of this world.
I’ll end by saying this: nonviolence may lead to failure. Look. Jesus suffered and was crucified on a cross by the Roman state. But how many people, about to celebrate Christmas, think Jesus Christ failed? He wasn’t a failure. His killers were failures. Sure, they lived, and he died. But life is not as important as truth. And truth, my friends, is love.
God bless you and God help America. Thanks.
Report thisBy Jeffersonian-Socialist, December 14, 2009 at 10:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I AM THINKING ABOUT THE NEED TO CREATE A UNITED JEFFERSONIAN SOCIALIST FRONT IN U.S.A. IN SOLIDARITY WITH THE BOLIVARIAN-REVOLUTION AND OTHER MORALIST GOOD-INTENTIONED MOVEMENTS IN THIS WORLD.
http://jeffersonian-anti-israel-socialists.blogspot.com/2009/11/nature-of-socialist-workers-revolution.html
“It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a Free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even of his personal services to the defense of it.” -George Washington
“The great men are necessary, the time in which they appear is accidental; that they almost always become masters over their age is only because they are stronger, because they are older, because for a longer time much was gathered for them.” -Twilight of the Idols
“Under capitalism the exploited masses do not, nor can they ever, really participate in governing the country, if for no other reason than that, even under the most democratic regime, under conditions of capitalism, governments are not set up by the people but by the Rothschilds and Stinneses, the Rockefellers and Morgans.” -The Foundations of Leninism
i am thinking about the need in USA of a United Jeffersonian-Socialist Front (A United-Front) composed of small socialist and alternative anti-war, anti-fascism, anti-rich people, anti-upper classes, anti-concentration of wealth, pro-workers, pro-economic democracy, pro-moralism, pro-humanism, pro-egalitarianism parties in USA. This is just an idea in my mind which i will suggest to some socialist political leaders of this country, to see what they think about it, it might be called “United Jeffersonian-Socialist Front”, which would be based on the humanist christian traditions of: Jefferson, Lincolnia, Washington, New Testament Social Doctrine of The Bible, Marx, Trotsky, Lenin, and anti-neoliberalism, anti-NAFTA, economic-nationalism, participative-democracy, Bolivarian-Socialism of the XXI Century ideology, And which would include the following political parties, politicians and independent intellectuals: The green party, Ralph Nader, Socialist Party of USA, Socialist equality party, workers party, The Labor Party, Dennis Kucinich, Ron Paul, green party, Ralph Nader, Cindy Sheehan, Howard Zinn, Ray Mcgovern, David Ray Griffin, Noam Chomsky bob barr, Ron Paul, Cynthia Mckinney, James Petras, Michael Hudson, Bill Van Auken (President of the Socialist Equality Party), Amy Goodman, Juan Gonzalez, Juan Cole, Seymor Hersh, Chalmers Johnson, Alan Maass, Michael Parenti, Alexander Cockburn, Paul Craig Roberts, Tariq Ali, Jimmy Carter, Chris Hedges, and many other americans who are moralists, humanists, altruists, and rational human beings.
However this is just an idea in my mind, a work in progress, its is still a utopia and a dream, not realized and materialized yet. I still have to propose this idea to some of the leaders in the US progressive and humanist anti-zionism, anti-war movement. It would be a United Front in solidarity with the Bolivarian Revolution, The Iraqui Revolution, The Palestinian Revolution, The Iran government, The Evo Morales Revolution, the Cuban anti-Imperialist revolution and all movements, liberation churches, and just anybody who has good intentions and morality in this world.
.
Report thisBy Jeffersonian-Socialist, December 14, 2009 at 9:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
AMERICANS DON’T NEED POLICE FORCE TO CONTROL THEM. US CITIZENS ARE CONTROLLED BY BINGE-EATING ON CAKES, BURGERS, PIZZAS, CABLE-TV, IPODS, LAP TOPS, CELL PHONES, PLAYSTATIONS AND MODERN GADGETS
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/quinn/2009/1214.html
Because americans are sedated by a high carbohydrate diet, and all the modern toys they are not aware that America is morphing into a full throthtle fascist state. USA is a hardcore nazi fascist system, only a bloody revolution Bolshevik-French style could solve this.
Those in control of America also use conditioning and teaching to keep the lower classes in their place. The ruling elite send their children to exclusive private schools, grooming them for Harvard, Yale and Stanford. This guarantees they will be given the high level positions in business and government
After decades of pumping billions of tax dollars into public schools while instituting politically correct diversity programs to dumb down the curriculum, the ruling elite have conditioned a vast swath of Americans to care more about Tiger Woods’ driving and night putting skills than about the National Debt or the insidiousness of Federal Reserve induced inflation.
The US troops are fascist buttlickers who gladly serve the capitalist wealthy corporations to exploit and murder vulnerable civilian populations overseas. The Iraqi and Afghani Freedom Fighters are doing the world a HUGE FAVOR by killing them.
You will never change the fascist US government with peaceful demonstrations or the electoral process. The harder you try, the more violent the government response will be. Remember Kent State. The peaceniks who didn’t experience the sixties need to learn some hard lessons in the form of their own personal Kent State-type events.
Then perhaps the current generation of peaceniks will wake up to the fact that the only way to overcome US fascism and weed it out of the US government and US society is with an all-out, Bolshevik-style, violent and bloody Revolution, complete with many thousands of public executions on the Washington Mall.
You cannot use democracy to restore democracy in a nation that is no longer a democracy
The USA has killed 20 million people throughout the world during the past 60 years. The USA armed and supported the murderous Khmer Rouge.
US foreign policy is profoundly fascist, and as the likes of Panmearbig, Deep Red, and Kcuck have repeatedly pointed out to us, our US taxes go directly to fund genocide and fascism throughout the world.
It’s way past time for us to put a stop to it.
The real heroes are the Iraqi, Afghani, and Palestinian Freedom Fighters. The US, British, and Israeli troops are fascist butt-kissers.
The only US military vets I respect are the ones who have thoroughly renounced the uniform, the service, and the government of the USA.
We do not need or want help from loyalist veterans during the next American Revolution. Since they gladly served the cause of fascism, they cannot be trusted.
A new Chevy Malibu is priced around $23,000.00. Add to this 8 percent sales tax, insurance, and another $1,000 in the city for plates and you have yourself one luxury automobile. The problem is that 50 percent of the people in the USA do not make $9.50/hour.
The median income is $18,000. A decent home is $130,000. If your weekly pay should be your house payment, then a single-income family would be living in a $40,000 home. Houses are not $40,000 or even $80,000 in most cities in America.
Without a resurgence of union wages and union membership and union power americans will have decades of poverty ahead. Perhaps a long, hard, cold winter will get the american people out in the streets to overthrow the capitalist system. Something has to give.
Report thisBy lichen, December 14, 2009 at 4:01 pm Link to this comment
Brilliant speech Cynthia!
Report thisBy Kay Johnson, December 14, 2009 at 2:54 pm Link to this comment
“Many people WANTED to come to DC on the 12th but couldn’t make it due to budget constraints, etc.”—Jeanine Molloff
Jeanine is absolutely correct! If I could have been there, I would have been—currently, about all I can do is pay rent and buy food. Beyond that—I’m tapped out and looking for work!
However, here in NYC, I attended an anti-war rally on December 3, following the official Obama announcement that he decided, after great deliberation, to escalate the war in Afghanistan, again. Sadly, very few people attended the rally.
Without a doubt, we need more people in the streets, but I have have to hit the streets where I live, I have NO resources to travel!
Thanks to Cynthia McKinney for taking the time to add your speech and comments to ours! Maybe, truthdig can add the video so that we have access to it!
Report thisBy jean Gerard, December 14, 2009 at 2:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Good to see Mr. Hedges doing what he has been advocating that others do.
Takes courage. As to why the crowd was so small: Bears out my assumption
that people are scared to protest. Hundreds of thousands would have been
there if recent protests had not been so over-surveilled and over-controlled.
All that equipment—horses, dogs, tasers, teargas, uniforms, clubs, boots,
guns, billy club, handcuffs, sound wagons—name it. Police are armed to the
teeth these days and protesters have no way to avoid being pushed into a
corner and enticed to try to protect themselves, at which point they are
arrested.
No government that is really free, no government that respects its citizens, no
government of the people by the people for the people would tolerate this kind
of police repression. Such a show of military force creates a mood of fear and
hate on sight. People are smart enough to recognize the risk, and many many
are unwilling to take it, considering that the situation is so unfairly weighted
against them. Counterviolence feeds violence.
No government that wants input from its people, wants fresh ideas, wants help
and support would permit this kind of “surveillance.” “The right of the people
peaceably to assemble” has been destroyed by that posture of police threat and
intimidation.
On the other hand, the internet offers much better and faster communication
for organizing and for clarifying and transmitting a message. It also makes the
world available.
Some entirely new non-threatening forms of “getting to” the sources of power
Report thismust be found. Creative thought and organization is called for. It’s an entirely
new day. Will we, the people be able to rise to it?
By Cynthia_McKinney, December 14, 2009 at 2:06 pm Link to this comment
Truthdig omitted my participation in the rally even though I preceded Nader, Gravel, and Hedges; I include here my remarks:
My fellow Americans,
Millions of us are drinking dirty and contaminated water;
4 million of us will get foreclosure notices by the end of this year;
25 million of us are un- or underemployed;
47 million of us have no health insurance and millions more are under-insured. My aunt was killed by the health care system in this country, not because she didn’t have insurance—she did. What she didn’t get was quality care. And amid all the talk about health care, no one is talking about quality care.
My cousin, who is no more than 24 years old, is now $100,000 in debt because she wanted to get an undergraduate college education.
But the trials of my family are not our story alone:
Millions of us are in the same boat. And no matter how hard we wish for a better world, and a kinder country, our policy makers are not delivering on our hopes and dreams.
In fact, the dreams of our country stand deferred and drowned in debt.
Sadly, in the face of growing income inequality, our President chose to transfer over 23 trillion of our hard-earned dollars to the bankers and financial elite—who didn’t have to work hard for it at all, just tank our economy.
So huddled in fear, we pray together that the flu, a hurricane, the Great Depression, or the next terrorist attack doesn’t hit us.
Now, given all these problems what do our leaders do?
Bomb, maim, and kill people on the other side of the planet whose resources certain powerful people in this country want to steal and whose territory occupies the land needed for global conquest.
Instead of investigating war criminals in the Bush Administration, President Obama has chosen to become one.
Our President is now complicit in torture, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes against the peace.
So what are we to do?
We will not give up and we will not go away.
We are not so demoralized that we can’t see the truth; we know that lies are not truth; ignorance is not strength, and war is not peace.
We see the power of the ballot in Latin America where voters in unrigged elections are choosing freedom. Our freedom is under siege—as much right here as it is in Haiti or Honduras.
If U.S. politics was truly democratic, we would not have war. That’s why I support Senator Gravel’s national initiative project.
Who has $100 million of their own money to spend to get elected, like New York’s Mayor did?
We are ready to act on our dreams—to create the kind of change that graduates students from college—free of charge.
That treats medical ailments—free of charge.
That reflects our interests, not the special interests.
That gets peace candidates for Congress elected all over this country. And that elects a peace President!
While our fellow Americans are afraid to get sick; struggle to keep a job, educate their children, stave off foreclosure, and make ends meet, we will not rest.
As long as bombs drop and civilians die, we will not rest.
While the oligarchs and the war machine get our money, we will not rest.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. lamented that both political parties failed to take a stand for what was right; he said that our scientific power had outstripped our spiritual power; that we possessed guided missiles and misguided men.
Well, President Obama: Don’t be misguided!!
Stop shielding war criminals from justice in our courts;
Stop supporting the Patriot Act and spying against us environmentalists and peace activists;
Stop granting power to the Federal Reserve;
Close Guantanamo!
Stop torture and rendition, secret prisons, and building military bases all over the planet.
President Obama: Stop the saber-rattling at Iran!
Stop the drones and depleted uranium; Stop bombing Somalia. Stop using war as an energy policy!
Stop bankrupting our nation!
We will not rest; we will not stop; and our peace candidates will win!
Report thisBy KidGenius, December 14, 2009 at 11:18 am Link to this comment
I got mad heart for Ralphy! Always will…
mr obama is going to go down as one of the biggest disappointments in recent history…right next to good ol Jimmy Carter. I think its funny how the world is lavishing this dude, yet, the contrasts between O & W are few at best and in my opinion, more superficial than political.
with that said, i felt this quote by our former president was prudent:
“There’s an old saying in Tennessee — I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can’t get fooled again.”
—President George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
Report thisBy talullah, December 14, 2009 at 10:09 am Link to this comment
What does Mike Gravel have to lose, that he can’t stand up and demand of his colleagues that they produce the evidence on which their pro-war stances are not only based but dependant?
When my representative tells me that the evidence is so secret that even he can’t see it, I tell my representative that he’d better find a way to make that evidence available to those he expects to do the dying in the war he’s so hot to have, or else he can look for another job. What’s he going to do: Represent the people of his state by telling soldiers on their way to die that they can’t be trusted?
Report thisBy talullah, December 14, 2009 at 9:10 am Link to this comment
thecrow, December 14 at 10:10 am
Mostly I remember Larry King, who, after he’d interviewed all the other candidates, turned to Kucinich and challenged him with, “What are *you* doing here.”
It wasn’t only as though King considered Kucinich to be something foolish or grotesque, seated among royals. It was what King was saying of Kucinich’s constituents, and all those who, until that moment, had been relying on Kucinich.
Report thisBy Jeanine Molloff, December 14, 2009 at 8:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Here’s a suggestion; why don’t they do a major videoconference link on a big screen with multiple cities all having their own demonstrations? Then tape the event, create a ‘viral video’, send it out on the web and to major international media. Scoop the MSM here in the US. Many people WANTED to come to DC on the 12th but couldn’t make it due to budget constraints, etc. Doing it this way via video conference link would include many who cannot make the trek.
Report thisBy bozh, December 14, 2009 at 7:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Some people advise: assume/expect, think of the worst outcome in any situation. So, that’s what i expect for pashtuns and iraqis.
The worst that can happen to pashtuns wld be a nuclear attack against them.
Let’s recall that not a humnan being save truman et al, expected atom bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki.
Nuking pashtuns wld be optimal ‘solution’ for nato/us. [the words under single quotes denote their false symbolic value].
The worst solution for iraqis wld be to force the three peoples to keep on living in an evil emepire, that had been originally set up by other evil empires.
It wld best for world security to separate these people even tho all of them may continue to be ruled by feudal lords and warlords.
But is, then, US, among many lands and evil empires, not ruled by a gang of people and in kind exactly like a biker, street, or mafioso gang.
But haven’t we always been ruled just ab every where by gangsters?
Perhaps we haven’t been ruled by gangsters; euphemisticly called kings, princes, barons, boyars, lords, earls, counts, marshals, generals but only since, let’s say, 15 k yrs ago.
Before that, living in small groups, we had to have been much egalitarian to have survived. There was no way in those days for one or more individuals to control or subjugate others as is the case now and for the last 8-10 kyrs.
Report thisWe can expect even greater subjugation of lower classes.
tnx
By thecrow, December 14, 2009 at 6:13 am Link to this comment
Hedges calls-out the Beast as boldly as anyone:
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/forever-war/
Report thisBy thecrow, December 14, 2009 at 6:10 am Link to this comment
Study how Kucinich, Gravel, Nader and McKinney were ignored or smeared to the margins in ‘08 and you will know all you need to know about the Machine and how it selects its Oval Office salesmen.
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/belling-the-cat/
Remember this double-tap of the courageous Kucinich by St. Timothy Russert?
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/31/kucinich-i-saw-a-ufo/
Report thisBy elisalouisa, December 14, 2009 at 5:04 am Link to this comment
“What if they had a war and nobody went? What about a rally? What if they had a
Report thisrally and no one came? Well, Chris Hedges helped organize a rally which is what
many on Truthdig wanted, even though he is a writer. The rally became a reality,
minus the participants. Does this give strength to Obama, the military complex
and Wall Street? You tell me.
By Ouroborus, December 14, 2009 at 4:43 am Link to this comment
Nader said something very interesting; he said Obama’s
Report thisconstituency has no place to go, that’s why he ignores
them. Telling, very telling.
By ardee, December 14, 2009 at 3:23 am Link to this comment
It is unfortunate that there were so few in attendance. Had this been a pro war rally attended so sparsely Fox News would have been forced to show crowd clips of some other rally in some other place at some other time.
I think this event indicates a small but important turning point. Obama has overreached himself on the war and on the continuation of welfare for crooked financiers. Those who spoke here are speaking for a majority of Americans and they are speaking truth. I believe that, albeit slowly, more and more will make their opinions and their opposition known.
Obama may have doomed himself to a single term.
Report thisBy Textynn, December 14, 2009 at 2:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Thank you Rep. Kucinich, Mr. Hedges, Mr. Nadar.
Thank you for standing up for the people. It seems our representatives, in general, have decided not to stand for the people any more. Thanks for helping me to understand that I am not going crazy.
Report thisBy Scott McLarty, December 14, 2009 at 12:53 am Link to this comment
Nice to see the video clips here of Messrs. Nader, Hedges, & Kucinich, who delivered great speeches… But why only these big-name white guys? Where’s Cynthia McKinney, another headliner at the rally, who also gave a rousing speech?
Fortunately, you can watch Ms. McKinney on the End US Wars web site (http://www.enduswars.org), which has lots of clips of other speakers too, and also on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60U_AlCim9A). End US Wars deserves the credit for organizing the rally.
Report this