|
|
June 19, 2013
|
|
Joseph Stiglitz on the Budget and ‘the 1%’Posted on Apr 7, 2011
Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz was Amy Goodman’s timely guest on “Democracy Now!” on Thursday, giving his much-needed perspective on the proposed 2012 budget and his must-read Vanity Fair article, “Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%.” Watch the clips below and click here to read the full transcript. —KA Democracy Now! via YouTube: Part 1: Part 2: Advertisement Previous item: Truthdig Radio: Power in a Union Next item: ‘Colbert Report’: Wisconsin’s Supreme Showdown New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By sajhand, April 20, 2011 at 1:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I keep hearing of how complex this is. It seems that a few simple act of congress and the senate would resolve this. Just do what the voters want.
Report thisStop corporate welfare and trade laws. Bring jobs back to America.
By Alan MacDonald, April 8, 2011 at 5:25 pm Link to this comment
Although I always enjoy Joseph Stiglitz’s opportunities to educate the public about political-economics, and although I loved his fabulous “FreeFall”, I was a bit disappointed that Dr. Stiglitz did not have the time or chance to make a few important and closely related points with Amy during his “Democracy Now” interview today.
It would have been wonderful if the ‘trifecta’ of the most recent $40T ‘Financial Fraud Explosion’ (often deceptively called the “Financial Crisis”), the BP oil blowout, and the Japanese nuclear disaster could have been leveraged together to reinforce their common critical danger of allowing ‘negative externality cost dumping’—- such exploitive “gaming” of this biggest ‘market flaw’ which represents perhaps the penultimate damage done by the ruling-elite corporate/financial/militarist Empire to society, governments, people, and the environment. Average people need to be allowed to understand the massive damage that unaccounted, unregulated, uncontrolled, and perversely incentivized ‘negative externality cost dumping’ can be on our lives and world.
While Dr. Stiglitz wrote in his wonderful VF article that “of all the costs imposed on our society by the top 1 percent, perhaps the greatest is this: the erosion of our sense of identity, in which fair play, equality of opportunity, and a sense of community are so important”, I’m quite confident that he would, upon reflection, agree with Justice Louis Brandeis, and with Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson in their insightful new book, “Winner-Take-All Politics” that the ultimate damage caused by concentrated money-power to our country and our world is the destruction of democracy itself—- as Brandeis said better than anyone, “We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.”.
Secondly, it is interesting to note, relative to Dr. Stiglitz’s comments in his VF article that such vast inequality of wealth and income can be dangerous to the wealthy themselves, that “our own” CIA’s primary predictor for any country to devolve into civil unrest and revolution, is a GINI Coefficient of Income Inequality of greater than 0.45——of which the US is as far above as Robert Mugabe’s dictatorial kleptocracy of Zimbabwe! Perhaps a word dropped to this effect at a cocktail party hosted by Hedge Fund Managers would be useful—- on the off-chance that my favorite humanist Nobel economist ever attends such events.
Sincerely,
Report thisAlan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
Liberty & democracy over violent empire – People’s Party 2012
Global People’s Movement 2011/NOW
By Mike789, April 8, 2011 at 8:47 am Link to this comment
In a nut shell. It’s king shit without the outer regalia.
We’ve come full circle from monarchy to the ethic of middling class of the early Eighteenth Century America who put the lie to leisure class governance by virtue of hard work and dignified the self reliant small business owner, to the Gilded Age which embraced a Social Darwinism (wasn’t even Darwin’s idea) as a rationale for self engrandization and the eating up the little guys, therein setting the ideal for untrammelled corportism, to the present day where the wealthy deem it the rule that the general populace sustain their emminence even when they are the ones who fucked things up. Their entitlements!
Monarchies got their loot through divine
Report thisright. Today’s plutocracy gets a wax seal by claiming indispensible the hierarchical game of finance on Wall Street.
By Hank Van den Berg, April 8, 2011 at 8:36 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This downward spiral will only end when people get mad and go out into the streets and say “no.” A general strike would be a good beginning. This was proposed in Wisconsin last month, but “organized labor” quietly suppressed the idea. The press does not even cover the issue.
Report thisResistance will have to come from us. But we have been left uninformed and we have been transformed into willing servants of the wealthy. Chris Hedges calls this neo-feudalism. It took a thousand years to get rid of feudalism and just 30 years to get it back!
By gerard, April 7, 2011 at 11:40 pm Link to this comment
P.S. - I for one simply cannot imagine what the CEOs and the Wall Street manipulators are thinking. I think I am probably not alone. Stiglitz circulates among these people, meets them for lunch now and then, has access to their “think tanks.” What ARE they thinking, how do their minds work? Do they see what is directly in front of their noses—the sad dissolution of the country into a few over-privileged haves and millions of people whose lives are unfairly manipulated for obscene profits—the death of the spirit of democracy, the sickening of political will, the schizoid division of people from people? The slaughter of democratic rights and the corruption of justice? Is anyone talking to them about the incipient disaster? Or are they all mad and destitute of human sympathies?
Report thisThe people have a crying need for knowledge about this growing disaffection, its causes and possible remedies. Just the bald assertion that the rich care nothing for the masses of “others” is insufficient information. Something else is at work behind the scenes, some politico/economic cancer that will kill us all if we don’t understand what is happening.
Without understanding, resistance is likely to be eitiher insufficient or misguided or both. We need to see “the whites of some eyes” here, metaphorically speaking.
By gerard, April 7, 2011 at 6:26 pm Link to this comment
It would be very helpful if Joseph Stieglitz and other bonafide economists would hasten to point out to the rich 1% and the rest of us just exactly how they will “regret” the collapse they are getting the world into. Apparently they don’t realize what they are doing? Or they don’t care? Or they think they will escape? We all desperately need details on their basic attitude of laissez-faire, and we can’t get to them to ask. But he can. Fill the gaps. Probably nobody else is ready and willing.
Report thisBy Sinclair, April 7, 2011 at 5:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Is it any wonder why someone as intellectual as Stiglitz ends up only invited on Democracy Now! rather than, say, CNN or MSNBC? The simple answer is no. Both medias, right and left, want to derail the real talk by constantly putting on talking heads who feed audiences the same talking points almost word-for-world repeating the host’s introduction remarks with no real elaboration, whereas the likes of Juan Gonzalez and Amy Goodman continue to put the real, harsh truths out there in the open, even if they’re ugly and depressing as hell. As always, however, the man who knows more about economics than anyone in Congress will be entirely ignored save for someone like, say, Bernie Sanders, while Democrats continue to seek about compromising in a bipartisan manner with Republicans to “help get Americans back to work and America back on track” in a way that both see appropriate, which of course, will never happen since one side sees the only big issue as being “big government spending” and the other side, led by the always worthless Harry Reid, sees only the desire to find a mutual agreement handshake with Republicans so that all’s well can end well.
The only real difference is that this isn’t a Shakespearean tragicomedy, but rather a real-life tragedy with a seemingly countless number of acts yet to be performed in regards to “both sides of the aisle,” although it always seems to me that ever since Obama took office, and, to be more exact, going all the way back to the beginning of the Reagan era, if not at the moment Eisenhower completed his farewell address, both sides have been spitting out rhetoric that has gotten progressively more extreme and insane, with most of it now just playing off as the exact same act being performed every single time. The act always seems to ultimately end in the same way - the wealthy, perhaps a cast of 400 (since the richest 400 are more wealthy than the bottom 50% COMBINED), wear their crowns, while the Democrats, that is, those not completely corrupted by the corporate suits, stand on the far side of stage-left or stage-right trembling in horror knowing defeat has finally arrived (or has it been there all along since the Reagan era….???), and last but certainly not least, the Everyman/woman - you, me, our neighbor down the street who can’t even find the sufficient means to put food on the table for his family anymore and embarrassingly knocks on your door to ask for any help possible - lies in the center of the stage broken and beaten to a bloody pulp internally (and perhaps externally as well) wearing what I would describe as something akin to a crown of thorns, only the wealthy are blind and do not recognize it as such, while the Democrats know not what it means in the slightest. Here, at the current conclusion - future scenes are still unwritten unlike in countries like Egypt - the Everyman/woman perishes but with the inner hope that someday the corporate empire will fall just as they all eventually fall, and thus, a metaphorical resurrection of the good, working-class Everyman/woman takes place following the complete collapse of American Imperialism, which is either a result of absolute, nationwide rebellion, or of the fact that no empire sustains itself for eternity. Is it a tragedy then? I really do not know. My vision of this ending is my own creation, and others will certainly vehemently disagree.
You see, in the end, the people, especially the primarily oblivious youth and extremely loyalist Dems, can either take the facts provided by Mr. Stiglitz and collectively change the course of the nation as a united mass of individuals, or simply brush his facts and observations aside and think about it all tomorrow.
As Pastor Martin Niemoller stated many a year ago:
“Then they came for me,
Report thisand there was no one left to speak out for me.”