so where will Democracy Now position itself in the aftermath to the break up of Libya?

DN and resident NATO shill Jaun Cole, mercilessly regurgitated NATO’s agitprop leading to
the R2P carte blanch for wholesale bombardment, never once seriously questioning the
authenticity of any Libyan Army so-called massacres of protesters - never reporting in any
significant detail well-armed insurgents attacking a police station and storming an armory in
Benghazi in the first days of the insurgency - virtually always portraying the armed rebellion
as ‘peaceful’ protesters being attacked by the Libyan Army

Democracy Now, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, National Endowment For
Democracy and of course the Arab League and United Nations are all complicit in NATO’s
Rape of Libya

For this, I hold them all in abject contempt; especially Cole and Goodman, so-called
‘progressives’ - and they’re at it again with Syria - tip: examine with great suspicion anything
produced by Al Jazeera

e.g. http://counterpsyops.com/tag/fake-footage/

Al Jazeera prepares fake images of Syria (Just as it did for Libya)

http://counterpsyops.com/2011/10/08/al-jazeera-prepares-fake-images-of-syria-just-as-it-did-for-libya/

Syrian television broadcasted a special program with Thierry Meyssan on October the 6th. The
president of the Voltaire Network shared what he has learned from his experience in Libya.

On Syrian television, Thierry Meyssan revealed that Al-Jazeera just created sets (copies of) of
the Umayyads and the Abbasids squares (Damascus). The channel also intends to reproduce
the central squares of four provincial towns. Qatar provides significant military effort in
Western military action against Syria.

Is it not true that the Iraq war demonstrated that the U.S. government, news media, and courts were enemies of truth, peace, human rights, and international law?
That the U.S. has embraced aggressive war, torture, and detentions without trial?
That the U.S. overfunds its military, and that this is systematic?
Did that immoral and illegal war not prove that the U.S., despite all the advantages enjoyed by its people, is beyond redemption?
Perhaps there is more truth than conservatives realize in their political credo to “starve the beast.”

The sad thing about this war is how enthusiastic everybody was about starting it.
Which I never understood.
The overwhelming majority of Americans believed: (1) the international weapons inspectors in Iraq were so inadequate that the security and safety of the U.S. necessitated the use of force, and (2) the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 did not violate international law.
What am I missing here? Never made a lot of sense to me.

Alas, talk is cheap. What must be done is the confiscation of all profiteering acquired by the kleptocracy followed by the redistribution of the illgotten wealth to those most afflicted by our actions. Obama speaks with flowery words about the glowing prospects for Iraq but fails to mention who will repair the devastation. Billions in corporate welfare to our illustrious arms manufacturers to rebuild a military who’s sole purpose it will be to keep their population docile and cowed while our avaricious free market capitalists rob the country blind. Seems to me that Maliki is nothing more than the new Mubarack!