Colbert was brilliant here.He played the bad cop beautifully,forcing Mr.Sanders to articulate his position clearly for all to understand.Excellent tag team effort gents.America’s middle class needs more men with balls like Bernie Sanders going to bat for them.He has my respect and admiration.

Colbert was a bit harsh here. He seemed upset by the wording of the bill Bernie was proposing and argued that it would limit free speech in news organizations like Viacom. He even mocks the bill at the end by pointing out the unlikely hood of it passing.
What they both failed to distinguish was that there should be limits on funding from companies to campaigns, and that funding a show like Colbert is completely different from funding a campaign. If people/companies want to give their money to Fox or Viacom to get whatever point across they can, but if they want to donate to it PACs like Colberts SuperPac (or other political groups) then that is where limits are needed. Colbert really seemed upset with Bernie.
Limits are needed on money to politics. Fin

I’m being picky, but Mr. Colbert has the ratification
hurdle wrong, thus do all those who hang on his every
word in these matters ; so does Bernie Sanders, since
he nodded in agreement. Ratification of a proposed
constitutional amendment requires assent by either at
least three-fourths of the state legislatures or at
least three-fourths of fifty special state
conventions called for the purpose of ratification.
The two-thirds fraction mentioned by Colbert is in
play for purposes for proposing an amendment to the
constitution. He might try reading Article V, The
Constitution of the United States of America.