Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
February 25, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Hell No
The Other 43 Percent

Truthdig Bazaar more items

A/V Booth
Email this item Print this item

Bill Maher on ‘Conan’: Obama Not First Gay President

Posted on May 16, 2012

Bill Maher discusses Newsweek’s Obama cover with Conan O’Brien.

When Newsweek published a cover this week that declared Obama America’s “first gay president” after he came out in favor of same-sex marriage, it raised some eyebrows. On Tuesday, comedian Bill Maher addressed the controversial cover during an interview with Conan O’Brien, declaring to the late night talk show host that he didn’t understand the connection. 

Maher drew a comparison to when author Toni Morrison called Bill Clinton “the first black president,” a link he said he understood. “She said so many things were similar to the black experience ... single mother, working class, grew up poor,” Maher said, adding that Morrison also included the fact that Clinton played the saxophone and ate at McDonald’s. “Clinton was like black people for those reasons.”

However, Maher and O’Brien struggled to make sense of why Newsweek would consider Obama the first gay president.

“What about Obama is gay ... I don’t understand how this translates,” Maher said. “Why is he the first, what did he do that’s gay?” —TEB

For the record, The Daily Beast’s Andrew Sullivan, who wrote the Newsweek article, made the comparison this way:

And yet there is something on this subject with Obama that goes deeper in my view than cold, calculating politics and a commitment to civil rights. The core gay experience throughout history has been displacement, a sense of belonging and yet not belonging. Gays are born mostly into heterosexual families and discover as they grow up that, for some reason, they will never be able to have a marriage like their parents’ or their siblings’. They know this before they can tell anyone else, even their parents. This sense of subtle alienation—of loving your own family while feeling excluded from it—is something all gay children learn. They sense something inchoate, a separateness from their peers, a subtle estrangement from their families, the first sharp pangs of shame. And then, at some point, they find out what it all means. In the past, they often would retreat and withdraw, holding a secret they couldn’t even share with their parents—living as an insider outsider.

And this, in a different way, is Obama’s life story as well.

Read more



Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments

By Thomas Billis, May 17, 2012 at 6:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I wish I could say that George W. Bush was the first “dumb"President but alas I cannot.I can say he was the “dumbest”.If Newsweek needs to sell magazines by calling Obama the first “gay"President what is the harm.Going back to Bill Maher’s statement about how he can see Clinton as the first black President becuse of common experiences I say to him Obama would be able to relate to any group that is considered outside.To any group that is discrimanated against.To any group that is denied civil rights.Being able to relate to the gay experience is more than singing show tunes.If a man who is of mixed race parentage in racist America cannot relate who can.

Report this

By BARBBF, May 17, 2012 at 6:22 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think Larry Sinclair might agree w/Newsweek:

A judge threw out the libel case against Larry Sinclair brought by Daniel Parisi over his book about him having sex & drugs with Obama in 1999!

Axelrod supposedly paid $750,000 to rig a polygraph Sinclair was to take with Daniel Parisi.  Parisi asked Sinclair to take the polygraph and he would pay him $10,000 but IF he passed it…$100,000.  Sinclair took the polygraph and failed.  Later, Parisi ended up paying Sinclair $20,000.  When Sinclair s book came out, Parisi sued Sinclair for libel.

NOW a judge has thrown the case out because Parisi did not give enough evidence that Sinclair lied in his book.  Parisi could not PROVE malice or that any untruths were written in the Sinclair book.

Vindication for Sinclair?  What for Obama????????

Report this

By Sean, May 16, 2012 at 8:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What about James Buchanan?

Report this

By berniem, May 16, 2012 at 2:17 pm Link to this comment

Gee, I didn’t even know that Newsweek was still around! Imagine that! FREE BRADLEY MANNING!!!!

Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right 3, Site wide - Exposure Dynamics
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook