Truthdig - A/V Booth - Tortured Law

			November 21, 2009 Log in / Register
			Text Size

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

The Afghanistan Speech Obama Should Give (but Won't)

Lipstick on a Rogue

Battlefield in the War of Ideas

Battlefield in the War of Ideas
By Eugene Robinson

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence
By David Sirota

Enough G-2 Talk Already
By William Pfaff

Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools
By Louis Freedberg and Hugo Cabrera, California Watch

Obama’s Job Approval Slips Below 50%

Iran to Test Its Readiness

Brit Warns Against Leaving Afghanistan

Obama Warns of Iran Sanctions

Lou Dobbs for President?

YouTube Videos to Wear Captions

‘Left, Right & Center’: The Geithner-Summers Backlash; Is Palin Dangerous?

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Yuletide Weirdness With Your Host, Bob Dylan

Hedges and Friends Debate Illusion, Conservatism and 9/11

Freedom’s Fight: Part II
By Gary Phillips

Claire Wasserman on Europe’s Islamic Immigrants
By Claire Wasserman

Oprah Sets Her Show’s Expiration Date

Behold the Food of the Future

Financial Meltdown 101

A Dig compiled by the editors of Truthdig

Vetting Sarah Palin

A Dig compiled by the editors of Truthdig

Dreaming War: Blood for Oil and the Cheney-Bush Junta

$9.56

Deception: Pakistan, the United States, and the Secret Trade in Nuclear Weapons

By Adrian Levy and Catherine Scott-Clark
$19.11

Ringer T

$22

Tortured Law

youtube.com

A new short film by the group Alliance for Justice examines the role that lawyers played in authorizing and legitimizing torture under the Bush administration. It calls on the attorney general to investigate not just CIA operatives but the authors of torture memos in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel. —JCL

Alliance for Justice:

President Barack Obama has ended six years of American torture of suspected terrorists arising from the aftermath of the 9-11 attacks. The torture was originally outlined and sanctioned in 2002 by a series of memos drafted by lawyers in the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel. Were these lawyers simply giving the President their best legal advice? Or was their work part of a larger criminal conspiracy to distort the law and authorize torture?

Attorney General Eric Holder recently announced an investigation of low-level CIA operatives who exceeded the grisly authority provided by the “torture memos.”

But the superiors who ordered these actions, and the lawyers who provided the legal cover have not been held accountable. Will there be a full investigation that follows the evidence up the chain of command?

Tortured Law, a new 10-minute documentary by Alliance for Justice, examines the role lawyers played in authorizing torture, and calls upon Attorney General Holder to conduct a full investigation of not only the CIA operatives, but of the torture memo authors.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

TAGS: attorney general bush john yoo lawyers office of legal council torture

Related Entries

November 20, 2009 Battlefield in the War of Ideas
November 20, 2009 Intelligentsia Against Intelligence
November 19, 2009 The Afghanistan Speech Obama Should Give (but Won’t)
November 19, 2009 GOP Obstruction Goes Unnoticed—and Unpunished
November 19, 2009 What Is So Patriotic About Hysteria?

Email to a friend

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: Keith Olbermann: Saving American Lives

Next item: 'Left, Right & Center': Nobel Surprise; the Dollar's Down

Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Jean Gerard, October 9 at 11:53 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Between a rock and a hard place. Problem number one: Is torture against the Geneva Conventions but wars killing innocent women and children not against the Geneva Conventions? If people are “collateral damage,” in a war situation, why aren’t “enemy noncombatants” “collaterl damage?” Problem two: Could the nation tolerate month after month of trials with media competing for more and more dramatic presentations dominating the evening news, finally petering out because the audience gets bored? Or gets tired of vomiting? Problem three: Would it be fair to pick out a smaller number of those most directly involved? Problem four: If judged guilty, how guilty? Would there need to be a worse punishment for waterboarding than for denying sleep; for slamming against a wall than for psychological damage (PTSD and worse)? Problem five: How much deep precedence is there to depend on and how much will break entirely new ground, and to stick will therefore need extra-careful and time-consuming jurisdiction?
I’ve thought a lot about this. It’s a hornets’ nest of excrutiating decisions. Snap judgment I’d say prosecute. Second thought? Frankly, I wonder? Something in between?

Report this

By lawyers, October 9 at 1:10 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Wow thats really shocking man .........i just wanna
know what happened next…

Report this