Rep. Peter King can have all the opinions about mj that he wants because that is NOT what this post is about even though ‘namecalling’ is easier to discuss but what should be of importance for everyone is his slamming of the MEDIA, our traitorous MSM, for streaming endless dribble about any one person or thing that becomes a never-ending story that distracts from real issues or does everybody think that there is nothing wrong with the MSM?

I say there is plenty wrong with the MSM as I named it ‘traitorous’ for good reason and that is their contrived subversion of the information people need to make important decisions which is soo much more important that it is probably the first thing our ‘new’ president should have corrected but didn’t and won’t since the MSM played such and important part in getting obama elected.

So think why a we come to sites like this which is actually to get away from the MSM for real news instead of being ‘beguiled’ by their on agendas.

King certainly cannot say—for having no way of knowing—whether or not Jackson was a pedophile, though there’s reason to suspect he was.

I’d not seen any of this after giving up on CNN yesterday evening when “the best (or whatever) name in news” could hardly be bothered to interrupt ongoing extolling of Jackson by Jesse Jackson and Tom Mesereau to cover events ongoing in Honduras. There were a few pauses so as to speak with Carl Penhall on the scene in Tegucigalpa, though damn few pauses. For the past week, CNN has attempted to have it both ways—covering too few (which is standard for all TV news operations) events worth learning of by pausing just long enough (not very long) to make mention before returning to topic at hand: Adulation (and gossip) of Michael Jackson. Which all networks have discovered—by noting overnight ratings—is a “winner.”  I was myself suckered until enough was enough.

CNN, like all the rest, pays attention only to ratings so that they might force Lilly to fork over more for putting up ads for Cialis. Which ads often commence, ironically enough, with, “All around the world…,” in most masculine voice. Then there’s hammering with ads for Nutri-System—for those well heeled enough to be able to afford delivery of daily meals by mail. (That’s right: CNN is mostly brought to you by providers of meats. Thank you very much.)

The past almost two weeks have been the most disgraceful in American mega-media history. Worse even than recent cheerleading of war on Iraq. At that time, at least embedded were in the vicinity of events, for all the little that was reported. MSNBC even got Howard Zinn on just after attack on Iraq. Vs. cold-warrior Col. Ken Allard, then employed by Microsoft/GE. “Radical!,” I thought. Though Howard was obviously not bully equal to Allard. Zinn, of course, was eventually vindicated, while Allard simply disappeared.

By now, mega-media has become not much more than a never-ending Access Hollywood. Focus always on personalities deemed “charismatic.” (So was Hitler.) Just lately, Jackson, Sanford and Palin. History needn’t be erased, since never learned in the first place. Obama has said nothing of history of U.S. “involvement” in Honduras, while pundits maintain he stole away opportunity for Chavez to speak of U.S. imperialism when he got out front with his own condemnation of what he/Clinton still refuse to declare—for legal reason—a “coup.”

Mainstream putty-fied would have all of us putty-fied, molded same as they’ve long been (speaking of “dead fish,” Sarah)—according to ideology of the free market in combination with ardent (indeed fascistic) nationalism. Journalist, Tom Paine, only implored we employ some common sense founded in reality far as can be HUMANLY known by senses available to humans. (Not simply reality per language, one need note. Though there’s also that.)

Orenthal James Simpson too was acquitted. Which hardly mattered to media as they made, and still make, fun of (mostly black-jury) acquittal, as same presume we all presume Simpson did deed. Not that any other than Simpson knows.

Some are laying into King for not noting that Jackson was acquitted. Same who’ve more than once alluded to Simpson as (presumed) guilty. No matter fact O.J. was equal, if not better, dancer—for five, ten, 15, occasionally 50 or more, yards per play.

We DO know Jackson paid $20 million to make something go away. While white jury got revenge on black jury’s acquittal of Simpson.

Peter King IS outta line, though not a wit more so than hypocrites who continue to presume O.J. guilty. King asks whether any would have left children alone in a room with Jackson. For any who answers, “yes,” how about overnight in a room alone with Jackson? No? Thought not.