LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 8, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Hezbollah, Fearing War, Digs In

Learning to Speak Anew in a Tribal World

Republicans vs. the Palinites

Obama to Tribal Nations: 'You Will Not Be Forgotten'

Honduras Agreement Falls Apart

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Kucinich: Why I Voted No

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
A/V Booth

‘Queer Eye for the Hawkeye’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Apr 7, 2009
Jon Stewart

Jon Stewart shares his amazement that “the aortic valve of the heartland of America” is more gay-friendly than California.

Daily Show:

The Daily Show With Jon StewartM - Th 11p / 10c
Queer Eye for the Hawkeye
comedycentral.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Economic CrisisPolitical Humor

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Chrome Bag - Free Shipping

Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By dihey, April 10 at 8:05 am #

Jon is way off the mark. The ruling of the Iowa Supreme Court is not “gay friendly” but a consequent application of our Federal Constitution in my opinion.

My state of Texas does not give driver licenses to any person that is not 16 years old. Is my state therefore “adolescent unfriendly” Jon? Stick to comedy please and stop peddling your obviously gigantic ignorance of legal matters.

The ruling of the Iowa court also shows that Clonakilty32’s remark “I also believe in letting the individual states decide on gay marriage” is dangerous nonsense. If a State Constitution violates the Federal Constitution, which is what the Iowa ruling clearly stated is the case here, that State tramples on our country’s laws. Is that what you advocate Clonakilty32?

Report this

By Kesey Seven, April 9 at 10:47 pm #

Jon Stewart is hilarious. I love watching him.

As for gays wanting to marry, they should be entitled to the emotional hell and agony that we all endure in the sanctity of marriage. More power to ‘em.

Report this

By Clonakilty32, April 9 at 9:37 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I also believe in letting the individual states decide on gay marriage.  I am against a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.  I won’t march with them in demonstrations but I will vote for for them.  I do not believe that any citizen of this country should be discriminated against for sexual orientation and are entitled to any and all rights of every other citizen of this country.

Report this

By tshirt-doctor, April 8 at 9:48 am #

why don’t all states do this thing, and then we could get to real problems.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
Chrome Bag - Free Shipping
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.