![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Obama Blasts GOP Anti-Terror TacticsPosted on Jun 17, 2008
Is someone soft on terror because he thinks the president shouldn’t be able to indefinitely imprison anyone, for any reason? John McCain and his surrogates seem to think so. Barack Obama fired back on Tuesday, blaming Osama bin Laden’s freedom on the failure of Republican strategies.
Watch it:
Previous item: Educating McCain on Iraq Next item: 'Baracknophobia' Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Pacrat, June 21 at 11:22 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Obama should let his staff rebut McDork - he should save his time and energy for important issues. Of course McShame will attack everything he says and spin it to his own advantage - after all he was brain washed and spin dried many years ago!
Forget the mickey mouse stuff and concentrate on real issues.
Report thisBy JBlack, June 20 at 4:06 am #
This week, Obama claimed, again, that he’d promptly capture Osama bin Laden. OK, tell me how: Specifically, which concrete measures would he take that haven’t been taken? How would he force our intelligence agencies to locate bin Laden? And he can’t just respond, “That’s classified.”
He also claimed that fighting terrorism is a law-enforcement problem, not a military one (should we send the NYPD to Mosul and Kandahar?), and that the answer to terrorism is the approach taken after the 1993 World Trade Center attack, featuring conventional trials and prison terms.
That flaccid post-’93 response only encouraged terrorists - who are unfazed by the prospect of a US prison, where the quality of life’s better than it was at home. The Clinton administration’s hesitancy and softness gave us the subsequent attacks on the Khobar Towers housing complex in Saudi Arabia, on our embassies in East Africa, on the USS Cole and, ultimately, the events of 9/11.
The senator needs to tell us why it would be different now.
Obama has also said he’d send our troops into Pakistan, although he’ll withdraw rapidly from Iraq. His unwillingness to discuss the consequences of a hasty retreat from Baghdad is one thing - but invading Pakistan would be an order of magnitude worse.
A substantial number of Iraq’s 26 million citizens did welcome us. In Pakistan, with its 170 million Muslims and some of the most rugged terrain on earth, anti-Americanism prevails. Any US military incursion would be greeted with outrage and demands for a military response.
Nor does Obama appear to grasp that armies need fuel, ammunition, food, spare parts and other supplies. Nearly everything for our troops in landlocked Afghanistan, from bottled water to medical supplies, now comes via Pakistani ports, roads and railroads. If those long, difficult routes were cut, how would President Obama supply our troops? And no, it can’t all be done by air.
Oh, Pakistan has nukes, too.
Report thisBy JBlack, June 19 at 5:30 am #
The real story is not how McCain is like George W. Bush. The real story is how identical the Obama campaign is to every Democrat presidential campaign since McGovern. He will serve Jimmy Carter’s second term. There’s nothing new here. There is no change.
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 18 at 7:05 am #
Jon. Your question is a poignant one. While this clip reveals that Obama, unlike Bush & McCain, is not prepared to utilize the Orwellian phrase “global war on terror” as an excuse to assault the civil liberties of Americans, the Obama campaign has sought to avoid the issue of impeachment. The failure of Obama, Pelosi and Ried to put impeachment on the table reflects that they have chosen political expedience over devotion to the rule of law, which is why, whenever possible, we should work to replace corporatist Dems with true progressives.
By the way, there is nothing new in Obama’s avoidance of impeachment. During the very first Dem debate, when all seven candidates were present, the moderator asked for a show of hands as to who supported the Kucinich articles of impeachment against Cheney. Not a single candidate raised their hand, not even Senator Gravel.
Report thisBy Jon, June 17 at 10:05 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Does anyone have anything from Obama related to Kucinich’s 35 articles of impeachment. I’d really like to know what he thinks about this.
Report this