LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   On the Campaign Trail : Bill Boyarsky Reports on the Election
 
October 15, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

America’s Political Cannibalism

McCain’s Mob

Keep This ‘First Dude’ Out of the White House

Retirees Wake Up to a Swindle

The House That Todd Palin’s ‘Buddies’ Built

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * The Hoover-Palin Ticket
McCain’s Mob

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Boots on the Ground by Dusk: My Tribute to Pat Tillman

Boots on the Ground by Dusk: My Tribute to Pat Tillman

By Mary Tillman and Narda Zacchino
$15.10

more items

 
A/V Booth

Olbermann Criticizes Clinton for Assassination Comment

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on May 24, 2008
olbermann
youtube.com

Not known for being a shrinking violet, Keith Olbermann left no uncertainty about what he thinks of Sen. Hillary Clinton’s explanation for why she invoked the specter of Robert Kennedy’s 1968 assassination when discussing her decision to keep campaigning to the end. He’s not buyin’ it, folks.

Thanks to John Harrison of The Largest Minority for the tip.

Watch the clip:

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By cyrena, May 28 at 12:39 pm #

Courageous is speaking truth to power instead of covering it up, or playing along with State Sponsored Media lies.

Olbermann is obviously courageous. STILL!

As for objective. If pointing to the truth of anything...(he’s not only addressing this ONE occassion or Hillary wishing up the assassination, since it’s her 3rd) but rather ALL of the other nasty and deplorable actions that she’s engaged in over the past months of this campaign.

Now if addressing the truth of her own words and actions is somehow ‘not’ objective, I’d be interested to know what you think ‘objective’ is. I think ‘objective’ is calling a spade a spade, and anyone who doesn’t want to hear the truth, can always just cover their ears, as you’ve already indicated you do.

So, why read and post here?

Report this

By pacrat, May 28 at 6:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Remember when Olbermann was seemingly objective and courageous? That was a long time ago. We have stopped watching him (the mouth that roared) and his friend Chris (aka Philadephia Fats). Two guys who see too much of eachother and likely will start a new show - Let’s Play Soft Ball (we’ll do the talking, you do the thinking.)

Can any intelligent American say that he/she hasn’t thought of the dangers of assassination of either Barack or Hillary? There are a lot of nuts out there - too many of them have their own TV shows!

Report this

By Sue Cook, May 28 at 4:28 am #

Leefeller,

I agree with your assessment of Hillary and her remark(s).  But, I stand by my assessment of Keith Olbermann and MSNBC.

Report this

By Leefeller, May 27 at 1:56 pm #

Sue Cooke,

No, not everyone knows MSNBC is an Obama network, since some of us do not believe everything we see on TV, nor do some of us even watch TV. 

Checking out the Olbermann cut from above, and I feel it was over done, but I feel Hillary should never even mentioned what she said.  So the ball is in her court, she has a tendency to say very divisive and negative things, but I would expect nothing less from the Clintons.

If you do not like Olbermann, that is fine, but requesting anyone to be objective about Hillary right now would require watching something like Fox not the News or a lobotomy.

Report this

By cyrena, May 27 at 8:28 am #

Good story here Cy. (but then I always like to hear/read this stuff).

I remember taking a really, really, really, long way home from somewhere in Colorado about 16 or 17 years ago. (I honestly can’t remember where I was coming from, other than that I’d been there for a ski summit) The airport closest to where we’d been staying was closed, and I got a ride with some folks to Grand Junction. WOW! Now THAT was an experience. I was the only spot of color for miles and miles around, and especially in that airport. A few folks looked at me a little oddly, but not maliciously or anything. Everyone just sort of ‘carried on’.

I remember we stopped at several similar spots along the way, (I was basically hitch-hiking by air) and all were certainly ‘different’ from most of my own experiences. Still, it was a learning experience. Believe it or not, I was only trying to get to LA, so you wouldn’t have thought it would take 4 or 5 airplanes, and over 24 hours. But, it did.

Meantime, you probably wouldn’t recognize Denver. It’s really drastically changed. My former mother in law, (now 84) is originally from Denver, and she REALLY doesn’t recognize it. Very different.

But don’t forget, they let Condi Rice in when she and her family left the South, and that’s when she turned into a republican. smile

Report this

By Purple Girl, May 27 at 8:02 am #

3rd times a Charm Hillary???
Should anything befall Sen Obama- I will place blame squarely on HER shoulders!
She didn’t mean it the way it sounded- BS!
she is either a cold clculating manipulative viper or an IDIOT! Either means she is UNFIT to lead our country.Who did not know that would invoke a response? Who did not tell her it Would? If she is so intellegent an d’Intouch’ why did it not occur to her. It Did and She said it Intentionally to provoke such terrorizing visions!We do NOT need another Pres who requires an Interpretor every time they open their mouth- when they are speaking English!!Why would we need another such BS ortator to represent US Around th eWorld. She offends US in English, what will she say when she needs a Real interpetor when meeting with foreign leaders,. Her Lies, Her Tactics and Her self ordained right to rule attitude has already been done- The last 7 yrs has proven this type of Character is dangerous to US and the rest of the World. I don’t want her to quit just becasue SHE IS LOSING and wasting our time. I want her to QUIT so she no longer has access to the Airwaves to spew her retaliational Rhetoric- “obliterate Iran’ created even more of a National Security Threat.the world is holding it’s breath - like US- until the end of this dangerously corrupt adminstration, in hopes the next will be at least a bit more Rational.Seh and Mac are only helping to recruit more terrorist and further Attacks in the Future. And this time it won’t be the MIC they will Hit, It will Be our fault they made it into office!
Having voted in th eMI Primary, I am telling My Fellow Americans and the World THEY ARE TRYING TO STEAL THIS ONE TOO!!!MI Prim was Rigged- beginning to end. I do NOT want our delegates Seated NOR COUNTED!!!!And I have no Doubt the SCOTUS helped rig Indiana’s Too- One week before Prim they hand down that Voter suppression ‘Ruling’ . Criminals at ALL levels!

Report this

By Sue Cook, May 27 at 8:01 am #

If anyone with any character takes Keith Olbermann serious is very narrow-minded and not looking at the whole picture of what he represents.  RATINGS!

He’s in competition with Chris Matthews simply for rating purposes.  He makes derogatory statements against anyone currently in the news because he knows by adding emphasis,(like turning red-faced, using bulging eyes and sputterng a small paragragh all in on breath)to make his point.  RATINGS!

We all know that MSNBC is an Obama network.

We won’t see his facial displays on any gaffes Obama makes.

MSNBC = Shuster, Matthews, Olbermann = bias coverage.

It’s working for him, but anyone with un-biased, neutral observations, see right through him and take him for what he really is… an obvious Hillary hater, and suffers from an ATTENTION deficit disorder.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, May 27 at 7:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

...goes back to the founding of Colorado. The Crowleys and the Strattons have lived in Colorado Springs since they invented water. These are the people I was visiting when I was way-laid in Denver lo-those-many-years-ago.

Back After WW II Dad inherited a huge “camp” in Estes Park and I used to run around Aspen when I was nine, and the main street was dirt. There were still hitching posts in front of most stores, and occasionally you would see a real prospector with his mule going to the assay office.  Oh, yeah, sometimes there was still snow on the ground in late June.  One of my favorite 4th of July celebrations was when Dad took us to the Rodeo in Durango back in 57. They did a cowboy and Indian battle but everyone was drunk, and the Indians eventually won. The fireworks were spectacular but they set the woods on fire, and everyone, even us boys and girls did a water line to the creek till the rangers arrived. Great fun and one of my favorite memories.

My criticism was specific to Denver.

Haven’t been to Colorado in over 30 years, probably wouldn’t recognize it now.

Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, May 27 at 6:27 am #

Being an old dude, could Hill’s comment be characterized as “jumping the shark?” My wife is trying to get me to understand that characterization.

BTW, I didn’t need any reporter, commentator or analyst to tell me it was outta line and indicative of who and what the real Hillary is made of.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, May 27 at 4:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

BUT you appear to be laughing at and criticizing the wrong areas.

The “media” isn’t a “stereotype” it is diverse, and you can find almost any opinion with which you agree, just by flipping channels.

Lou Dobbs has beaten the shit out of Obama every night for four months. He is very sympathetic to Clinton’s POV.

Glen Beck can’t stand Obama, and this dislike is evident in his on-going commentary.

You also give us your realization that membership within the media take sides. The mavens of “NEWS” supported Roosevelt but hated Hitler (except William Randolph Hearst) They accepted blindly the strength of the Communist empire in Russia because they used only US government sources (no one found it strange that European countries were not worried?)

The Media folks sang George Bush’s praises after 9/11 when he was wildly popular, and then couldn’t say enough bad things about him when his polls plummeted.

Ditto
Jimmy Carter
Lyndon Johnson
Richard Nixon

Most of the news people follow us, they are invested in propagating a system where the majority of viewers, listeners, and (increasingly fewer) readers share a “National opinion” in this way the government and the media help each other. Thus we have The Warren Commission, and the 9/11 Commission, ensconced as institutional fact, and any nay-sayers marginalized as right or left wing nuts!

The majority of media pundants have Clinton down for the count. they also have Obama with a lock on the nomination.  Personally I’m not so sure. The Clinton’s are expert at sleaze and manipulation, In fairness Obama learned his political skills on Chi-town’s sou’ side not the most up&up;place for above the belt battles.  It ought to be quite the show. I might even go to Denver to watch.

What the media (all of them, left right and center) fail to mention is that no matter who wins the nomination, or who prevails in the fall, the news networks will tell us they knew all along, that the voters made a good choice, and that once again “Democracy” (which has never had anything to do with US government) once again has emerged unscathed.

What a great system.

Report this

By i,Q, May 27 at 2:31 am #

Fair warning: the following comment contains stereotypes used ironically…

In the estimation of many Coloradans, you probably couldn’t have picked a worse state to compare Colorado to, except maybe California. You ever hear the one about [url="http://www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/election2004/Purp leAmericaPosterAll50.gif" herf="http://www.fazed.org/forum/view/?id=15915&p=2" target="_blank" title=” bad joke to follow “>the Texan, the Californian, and the Coloradan?</a> wink

<a target="_blank" title=” Purple America 2004 by county “]Here’s a map[/url] showing how we voted in 2004. i live in the county just north of the nice blue one on the western edge of the state.

All chop-busting aside, you hit the nail on the head about Denver being like “a thousand other places....” You just can’t find a place without a-holes anymore.

Report this

By cyrena, May 27 at 2:26 am #

Now this is funny. “Reading assassination into a comment (actually 3 comments over a period of months from the same horses mouth) that specifically talked about ASSASSINATION. Even a deaf mute who knows how to lip read could understand that very long comment by Hillary this time. (like I said, her 3rd or 4th).

So, Hillary discusses assassination in an interview with the media, and they’re obviously recording it, (since that’s what the media does) and they play it for the world to see, and somehow, what came out of her mouth is the fault of the media.

I guess I can’t stop laughing either...absurd is certainly what we get. Do ya supposed maybe they had some sort of mechanism that turned her words into something entirely different than what she said?

Well, that would be possible if she hadn’t issued another statement later, acknowledging that she HAD said them.

Report this

By i,Q, May 27 at 1:41 am #

i am truly sorry you had such a negative experience. i hope that you will accept my apology as an unofficial ambassador for Colorado. Perhaps your interactions with me through this website will prove there are positive people here too.

i looked over the links you provided (i feel a little dirty inside), and decided to do some further googling. i was shocked to discover in an article from the Westword that:

“Denver is scheduled to be the Western headquarters of the US New World Order during martial law take over… contacts who have been underground at the Denver Airport [also] claim that there are large numbers of human slaves, many of them children, working there under the control of the reptilians.”

i was alerted to this startling revelation after a google search for “nazi denver” led me to this gem of a website.

Report this

By Rhonda Davis, May 26 at 8:26 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I 100% agree!

Report this

By RHONDA, May 26 at 8:24 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

agree!

Report this

By Can't stop laughing, May 26 at 4:35 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Are you serious? You must need a vacation after this long primary to read assination into THAT COMMENT. You are begining to look ridiculous!
The media loves Barack and hates Hillary so that is how all of the news that is feed to is slanted.
Fair and balanced is too much to expect from our media, I realize. But slanted and absurd is begining to look like all we will get.

Report this

By cyrena, May 26 at 3:35 pm #

You’ve got a point here CY, but the problem is...Denver is like at least a thousand other places in this respect...both then, and now.

I DO believe that it’s changed quite a bit though, over that time since the early 70’s. I’ve actually spent quite a bit of time there myself, off and on.
Maybe a very loose sort of comparison would be a suggestion that Denver is to the rest of Colorado what Austin is to the rest of Texas.

In other words, I think we know Colorado to be a mostly conservative and previously sort of racist State, but Denver has progressed quite a bit. I would say the same about Austin, which for the most part, is not as racist and conservative, and backward as so many other parts of Texas. I’m sure the same can be said of other places.

I don’t mean to suggest that it’s all gone away. But I don’t think it’s reasonable to assume that such thinking or feeling is necessarily endemic of community feeling, particularly in Denver.

Just a thought.

Report this

By David Veteran, May 26 at 10:19 am #

I see you have very low grammatical values.

Report this

By BigIslandDave, May 26 at 9:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Keith nails it yet again. He’s far and away the best commentator in the “mainstream media.”

HIllary is all about personal power. Nothing more or less. She should drop out immediately. She had her time. Now it’s Obama’s.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, May 26 at 4:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

By i,Q, May 25 at 3:42 pm #
Fair enough…

“… but any city has malcontents, racists, and antisocial subcultures. Alan Berg’s assassination is tragic, but i don’t think it accurately informs about the culture of an entire metropolis area 24 years later. “

What about this:

Such incidents are not restricted to the South by any means. In Denver,
Col. in August 1992, two cops, Bill Carter and Ruth Potter, of the
intelligence unit assigned to monitor Klan activities, were re-assigned
after they sent baby shower gifts to Klan leader Shawn Slater, a former
nazi skinhead. In a copyrighted interview with Kerwin Brook, an
anonymous white Denver police officer described how many cops will
go out and call Black or Mexicano people on the streets nigger or spic,
hoping to provoke an angry response and a fight where they can jump or
arrest the person. In a separate article, Brook reports the experience of
13-year old Jessica Vargas, who was on her way to protest a Klan rally,
when a Denver cop flashed a KKK hand sign at her and her friends.  We
know the cops are against us, but to see him do it with his own hands! 
And he just smirks, said Vargas. You just get shocked

or these:

http://www.adl.org/PresRele/NeoSk_82/3073-82.asp
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/colorad o-nazi-here-79324.html

Of course my personal experience started all this research. I was picked up by the Denver Police in 1972, for hitch-hiking They brought me to jail, kept me there for a week, and allowed the Colorado resident who was hitch-hiking on the same on ramp to go with just a ticket. I must allow that the jail food was excellent.

When I asked about this duel-standard in court, the Judge replied; “Are you Jewish? because you know you sound Jewish when you speak with that high nasal twang.” I asked how this was relevant to the case at hand, \He replied:
“Well when folks are foreign ...like from the east or something.. we have to take steps to insure they won’t flee, and go to New York, or Israel or somewhere.”

In my experience attitudes like that in a public official, not afraid to speak this way in open court, are endemic of community feeling. AND as the links above prove, some things don’t change even over 35 years.

Report this

By Pacrat, May 26 at 4:31 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Remember when Olbermann seemed intelligent and courageous? We do! Then the real Olbermann gradually took over - he hates Clinton, and women in general.

He forgot or never knew that a journalist reads the whole statement in its context before commenting - at what point do people like him let their feelings take over their brains??

Will he apologize - never!

Report this

By americahappens1, May 25 at 9:14 pm #

it says a lot about Olberman’s comments.

http://www.americahappens.com

Report this

By me, May 25 at 9:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

ha ha ha...I’m pretty sure that Hillary fans would say the same about obamas fans. Just the fact that you say this indicates that perhaps you are doing just so.

Report this

By Rhonda Davis, May 25 at 8:56 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Olbermann...WOW...He did a great job spelling it out.  Sad that this happens still - in this nation.

Obama will bring the change this country needs.

I think she is not worthy of his VP short list and pray he stays away from the Clinton’s period!

RD

Report this

By magouche, May 25 at 7:14 pm #

Thank you for this important link.  As a retired VA RN, I am aware of all that should be done for our returning Vets, and all that isn’t.  No one expected such a high rate of survival of the wounded.  Talk about poor planning.

Returning Vets from Vietnam received much more and intensive after care than our people returning from Iraq.  And even that often was not enough.

Try and view this very important Film “A body of War”, wherein the difference in treatment is starkly depicted:

http://www.bodyofwar.com/

And thanks to all our brave soldiers this Memorial Day!

Report this

By cyrena, May 25 at 7:10 pm #

Keith Olbermann calls it insensitive and hearless.

I call it the Banality of Evil.

THAT’S what’s wrong with them. Nearly 8 years of Dick Bush has irrepairably demented them. (although my guess from a lot of these posts is that they were like that already, so it didn’t take much).

Report this

By magouche, May 25 at 7:00 pm #

No he did not distort anything.  He never even comment the first THREE times she mentioned assassination.  I guess enough is enough.  KEITH OLBERMANN, MY HERO!

In this campaign, in which Obama has been compared to Bobby Kennedy by many, it was in bad taste for HRC to invoke Kennedy’s assassination, not once but four times in this year alone.  Especially, since our country has a history of assassinating black leaders, like Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcom X, and Medgar Evers, for example.

Ms. Clinton is very clever at insinuations and implications.  If she honestly just had wanted to make the point that other campaigns ran long and into June, she could have said:  “My husband’s campaign and Bobby Kennedy’s campaign lasted until June.” Period.

However, all the four times she said it, she added that we should remember that Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June, in California.  This was gratuitous.  Especially in the current political climate where any idiot can be given an idea to do bad things.

In the current campaign, California has already voted, so it is a moot point to refer to our state.  But then the assassination remark would be hard to place, since it happened in California,

She’s a clever little bugger, I’ll give her that, but it was a convoluted, disingenuous way to state her case for long campaigns.  It sounded like she is waiting for something to happen.

That is how many of us interpreted her, repeated, statements.  It is scary, really, and a person like that should not be at the helm of our country.

Report this

By nrobi, May 25 at 6:45 pm #

In cold light of day, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s remarks are but one thing, opportunistic and bigoted. It seems to me that the nation as a whole, should stand up to the maniacal and bigoted statements that have been coming from the Clinton camp.  To do this, would prove one thing, that as a nation, we will not tolerate the kind of shenanigans that have spewed forth from the campaign of Sen. Clinton.  I for one, am appalled, that Sen. Clinton, would reference the assassination of one of the brightest and most electable men of that age, Sen. Robert Kennedy.  It is beyond comprehension why, this came straight from the mouth of Sen. Clinton herself. Would you stand for someone mentioning the killing of your loved one at a time when this country seems to be on the precipice of another war, led by the shrub and his cabal of thieves?  Surely, we have come far enough that the people of this country are not swayed by the antics and rhetoric of a person, who, wishes power for the sake of power?  In my mind, we now know the true Sen. Clinton, we as a nation cannot and should not be thinking of her as presidential material. This person has proven herself incapable of uniting this country around a standard of decency and integrity.  Her comments are inexcusable, not those of Keith Olbermann, he has spoken the truth regarding the crass and unfeeling nature of all the comments made by Sen. Clinton. I, hope and pray, that Sen. Obama is elected president, for surely this nation will be back on track, nationally and internationally.

Report this

By I Hate Libs and Olbermann, May 25 at 6:35 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Olbermann is a blow-hard buffoon.  What a PC licking piece of work.  Don’t get me wrong, all libs are miss guided and uninformed, but Olbermann....ha, ha, ha, ha....loser....OUT!

Report this

By cyrena, May 25 at 4:11 pm #

I ditto i.Q. here, and thank you for the reminder. In all honesty, this Memorial Day kind of caught me by surprise, because my days seem to run together these past several years. Besides that, there has been little mention of it on any of the other sites that I generally visit either. AND...for whatever the reasons may be, my mental calendar had registered Memorial Day for NEXT weekend. (I don’t know why).

At any rate, the Juan Cole site is an excellent one, and I read it frequently. Sadly, I know his information to be accurate enough. The VA and the rest of this administration have gone to great lengths to cover up the number of our vets that have already succumbed to this horrific existence, just as they’ve made it a point to conceal the numbers of our own who return to us in boxes. (I’ve read that it was Barbara Bush who insisted that they be transported only under cover of darkness, and the media are not allowed around to record such events). Maybe that’s why we’ve not heard many reminders of the Memorial Day event. All things considered, maybe we should be glad that at least it’s not yet another 3-day mega-sale event, which is what usually happens.

One thing very unusual did happen here though. I noted on Friday, just before 4:00pm, that our major center on our campus was being shut down for the entire weekend…though Monday. The center holds the Post Office and other public access buildings and services, even though they are mostly just used by students/staff/faculty. Regardless, my point is that this is generally a 24 hour facility, and while there are times when the Center has shorter hours, (such as holidays and academic breaks) there has never been a time, (to my knowledge) when it has been completely shut down, beginning that early in the day. So, I don’t know what that may mean, since there were just some rather hastily scribbled notes posted on the door (as I attempted to collect mail) indicating that the building was ‘closed for the *holiday* weekend’…not really a ‘holiday’ at all.

Meantime, I don’t doubt the statistics provided here. I’ve already read of far too many suicides of our service men and women. And, we all know that they are not being taken care of as they should be, even when they attempt to get the care that they need. I read not long ago that the same troops are being sent back into combat with mega supplies of anti-depressants. It makes me sick, sick, sick.

So yes. They should be in our thoughts and hearts everyday, along with the families that suffer with them.

Report this

By i,Q, May 25 at 3:42 pm #

... but any city has malcontents, racists, and antisocial subcultures. Alan Berg’s assassination is tragic, but i don’t think it accurately informs about the culture of an entire metropolis area 24 years later.

Report this

By i,Q, May 25 at 3:29 pm #

Thank you for reminding us. It is too easy to get caught up in our concerns about the future and overlook the sacrifices of the past and the pain of the present.

Report this

By Patcy, May 25 at 3:18 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I am so tired of being told what to think and how and when to think it
By these white men who know better than me
I would almost--that’s an almost sit out the election
if they get thier way--
This man has let his ego outweigh the size of his head
Time for him to go MSNBC--Then we can start on
Chris and David Shuster --
Oh and don’t forget Mika of the laughing voice lol
And her daily --full disclosure--Right!

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, May 25 at 3:15 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

One name… Alan Berg.

Denver is home to more than the “Broncos”

Report this

By Leefeller, May 25 at 3:07 pm #

This Memorial Day Weekend is and should be a time of reflection and sadness for the deaths of our troops in the line of duty.  So far this weekend I was disappointed to find little in TD about the sadness of this state of affairs. 

So off topic I will just say this.  According to the following post about 12,000 military vets from the Bush wars are said to be contemplating suicide.  I suggest this link for a little reflecting on the events of the day. I do not have any idea of the validity of this site, but it bothers me, on and off this Memorial Day Weekend.  We know Vets have a higher incidence of suicide than the normal population (using the term normal loosely here).

Hope TD does some reflection.

http://www.juancole.com/2008/05/memorial-day-2008.html.

Report this

By Leefeller, May 25 at 2:51 pm #

Do not feel bad, I had seen it already when it came out. “John Harrison of The Largest Minority” has a neat sight, you can usually find some interesting links on his blog. It is nice that TD gave him credit.  TD used to use most of his Link stuff but lately they have gone other directions.

Report this

By cyrena, May 25 at 2:43 pm #

Well i.Q., I haven’t heard much more about Obama’s campaign bailing HRC out of her debts. I suppose it would be worth it if she really did do as we would hope, because yes...it would seem that the HRC supporters are clearly still in the tantrum mode, and still threatening to cut off ALL of our noses, to spite THEIR faces. (first it was the repugs who highjacked us all, and now our own siblings are willing to die for Hillary, and bring the rest of us down along with them).

Amazingly, I was never an Obama Zealot, and actually had my preference set on Kucinich at the beginning of all of this, but I would have been equally satisfied with Obama, Ewards, Dodd, or Richardson. Gravel would have been OK with me too. The ONLY democrat that I would NOT have wanted in the office, was HRC! HOWEVER, I didn’t always feel that way about her. Nope, it didn’t really begin until she authorized the destruction of Iraq. EVEN THEN, I was willing to cut her some slack, because while there were at least 100 million of us who felt differently about that decision, I actually understood how she may have been mislead, just as so many others were.

But then..she proved that she wasn’t ‘mislead’ at all, and that her only regrets were that we hadn’t invaded and occupied with enough force to wipe the place out sooner. So, by the time HRC rolled arrogantly up to the campaign event, I was pretty much done with her. Now, she could have actually saved herself in her campaign, even then. (It would have taken some doing though) But nope, she just decided on the kitchen sink tactic, and reached for the garbage disposal first. She’s been digging from it and throwing garbage at Obama and ALL THE REST OF US ever since. (Maybe she thought we’d had 7 years to get used to the abuse, and so that’s what we expected). She thought wrong.

But, I sidetracked. I just said all of that to say that I don’t have any real faith anymore, that she could be an assest to the dems putting Obama in the office. For one thing, these supporters aren’t gonna be swayed by her anyway. They’d rather stay on the cross. Besides that, who could possibly believe her sincerity at this point anyway?

Nope, I think she’d do more harm than good now. Pity, but that seems to be the way it is. So, I’m thinking we’ll just have to get by without them. It’s difficult to imagine that they would actually vote for McCain rather than simply stay home and sulk. But then again, it’s difficult to imagine the stuff I read from them on these blogs as well. So, I won’t try to predict. But, I still don’t see her being the least bit of an advantage.

So, she can pay off her own bills. She’s got a whole hell of a lot more money than most of us do.

Report this

By i,Q, May 25 at 2:32 pm #

Please elaborate Conservative Yankee, i spent three of the last six years living in Denver and i wouldn’t characterize the city in that fashion. They may be fanatics for the Avs and for the Broncos, but it’s no Selma, AL. Clolorado may not be the pinnacle of liberal enlightenment (well maybe in Boulder), but it is certainly a purple state and could very well go for Obama in the fall (sorry HRC supporters, it won’t go for Hill partly because of her Billy-baggage but also because we’re one of those caucus states she has alienated).

Yes, Tancredo is an idiot (if he’s the source of your antipathy), and his anti-immigration platform was xenophobic. His district is whiter and wealthier than the district that represents Denver proper, and it turns out that a large part of our state’s economy is fueled by migrant workers and their labor, and the fe(a)rvor over that issue has died down in the face of economic reality.

Perhaps you have some specific insights on the matter of Denver’s bigotry. i’m always up for learning more.

Report this

By Patcy, May 25 at 2:26 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I lost it with Keith--
Who I had always loved when he walked off MSNBC
Because he refused to continue to be apart of the
Impeach Brigade--I admired him
Now he’s just another of the I love Obama Protection Squad
When he likened to Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary to David
Duke --I gave up my “I love Keith Card”
Now forever
I ask this question--Why does the media feel the need to protect Obama--from what?
And what happens when they step down
Jez askin

Report this

By Paracelsus, May 25 at 1:58 pm #

An animal is most dangerous when it has been mortally wounded. Recall that LBJ had participated in the JFK murder(The Guilty Men). When he was spent out as a force in ‘68, he still had a deadly smount of venom in him. I don’t like Obama so much, but McCain is a lunatic, and Hillary is not much better. We have a nation armed and ready with the Patriot Acts and John Warner Military Commissions Act. I had hoped an Obama Presidency would give me more time to prepare for the worst.

Report this

By Patcy, May 25 at 1:53 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Wonder why the Obama campaign has backed off
of this--
And why the Clinton campaign has voiced outrage and
refused to apologize
And wonder why if this has been said so many times--
Why is it just now an outrage--
Do the words political strategy ring a bell?

Report this

By i,Q, May 25 at 1:52 pm #

i’ve heard pundits suggest that Obama might assume her campaign debt as (yet another) gesture of goodwill, but have you read anything anywhere that has more detail on that matter? It will indeed be interesting to see if this latest development will negate that thinking entirely, though i think it will be crucial to get Hillary on the trail stumping for Obama one way or another. It is fairly obvious how entrenched the Hillary supporters are, and for some of them, it’s going to take a lot of convincing to get them to come down off their cross to do what’s best for the nation in the fall.

i guess i’m not being 100% helpful by characterizing Hillary supporters as self-perceived martyrs, but i’m human. i’m pretty excited to (for once) be supporting the candidate who has the best chance of winning the nomination. i am curious though why Hillary supporters are more willing to betray the party if they don’t get their way. i thought it was us Obama zealots who were unswerving in our devotion to the cult of personality. i hope that the polling data suggesting more Clinton voters won’t vote for Obama if he’s the nominee is based on emotional ultimatums (temper tantrums) rather than actual calculation, but maybe it’s just that educated people (elitists;P) tend to be more reasonable than hard working white americans.

i guess it would be poetic justice if the Hillary supporters who feel they have had their candidate’s nomination taken away from them decided to take the presidency away from Obama in the fall. Er, wait that would be petty and childish, not poetic and just. My bad.

Report this

By desertdude, May 25 at 1:30 pm #

SHE HAS COMPLETELY DISTORED THE PROCESS TO WIN ENOUGH DELEGATES TO BECOME THE NOMINEE. BILL IS BLAMING THE MEDIA FOR HER SHOWING IN THE PROCESS. HE HAS A BIG MOUTH AND SHE IS NOTHING BUT A B**CH.

Report this

By desertdude, May 25 at 1:27 pm #

INVOKED THE ASSASINATION THEME, IS SHE HOPES ONE OF
HER SO CALLED WHITE VOTERS WILL KILL HIM. SHE KNOWES
EXACTLLY WHAT SHE SAYS AND WHY SHE SAYS IT. SHE GOT HER MESSAGE ACROSS AND NOW SHE BACK PEDALS AND SAY IT WAS WRONG TO INVOKE SUCH A MESSAGE. HER AND BILL
ARE JUST POWER HUNGRY.

Report this

By jti, May 25 at 1:10 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

HRC continues this losing battle for these reasons:

Monetary Capital- Straddled with having loaned money to her campaign she now needs to continue to present herself in a fashion to collect monies to pay off this debt.

Political Capital- Trying to maintain the Clinton political machine HRC wants the public to see that she still is a political force. There is truth to this idea but given her recent “Kitchen-Sink” approach and raising the specter of a possible assasination has lowered HRC amongst many, many democrats. Given the opportunity to be a binding force, HRC and Co. have chosen to be a dividing force within the party.

Historical Ridicule- Many forsaw HRC as the next president as early as December 2007. Supposedly, HRC had possessed the most organized and financed political machine in recent modern day political history. BHO and Co blew her out of the water!!! The dominating force of the Democratic Party (i.e. the Clinton Machine) is on its way of being ousted and the Clintonites do not want to leave. Many old-time Dems are ROFLMAO. How a young upstart kicked her a$$ will be the talk within the election circles from here on to eternity-an excellent lesson on how not to run a campaign.

Shorten the Political Window- HRC will continue to campaign until Denver just to shorten the press time to discuss her poorly managed campaign. The presidency was hers to loose and she just lost it. Not only did she loose the White House (and will probably NEVER have a shot as good as 2008) but she definitely did show her real colors to the African-Americans, Liberals, Next-Generation Dems, Hispanics, and Indepedents of the Democratic Party. 2008 will not be forgotten by many within the party.

VP Slot- HRC and Co. are trying to establish a political construct that will make it seem that BHO cannot win without her. BHO does not need her nor should he pay off her debt-BHO’s leverage. HRC has publicly stated that she would support BHO, so leave it at that. Let HRC and Co prove themselves. BHO has HRC and her people by their political monitary ball$. I say squeeze them!!

Honestly, I had a great deal of admiration for HRC to the point that I was an HRC supporter BEFORE I was an BHO one. It was not so much that I became enamored with BHO, instead I began to loose my trust and faith in HRC and her tactics. At a point where she could have been a unifying force, she instead choose to be a dividing force within the party.

Report this

By cyrena, May 25 at 12:07 pm #

Humm...How did HRC “get away” with uttering the ‘A’ word across the airwaves and internet?

Report this

By Aegrus, May 25 at 8:17 am #

You know, it is pretty sickening how people stalwartly linked to the Clinton campaign refuse to ever see anything she does in a negative light. You people are becoming so unfeeling, detached, resentful and shallow. My goodness. What is wrong with you people?

Report this

By kalitos, May 25 at 7:43 am #

I love this guy

Report this

By Andrea, May 25 at 7:37 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

This guy completely distorted Clinton’s comment about examples of primaries running into June. He was in my opinion he is rabid egotistical, moron who distorted the whole issue. Political assassination has been common in our history. Does this mean we cannot speak or reference it. A hear no evil, see no evil, speak of no evil mentality. I should hope not.

Report this

By Deeplip, May 25 at 7:21 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Hillary’s Prayer

Now I lay me down to sleep
I pray the Lord my soul to keep
And let there be an accident
So I can be the president

Report this

By Paracelsus, May 25 at 7:07 am #

Clinton has mentioned the assassination scenario 4 times already. Once is a gaff, but 4 times- those are threats.

Report this

By Leefeller, May 25 at 6:49 am #

Coming from a Clinton supporter, very amusing!

Report this

By cyrena, May 25 at 6:33 am #

Good going. (I’m dripping sarcasm here). Always helps to piss off monkeys and other living things.

Besides, you’ve already voted FOR the monkeys that we have now. What did that get you?

Report this

By cebraz, May 25 at 6:23 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The comment made by Keith is idiotic. He interpretted what Hillary said as if he knew what was in the mind of Sen. Clinton. Mr. Olbermann if you don’t like to forgive Hillary it is your right because you are supporting Barack Hussein Obama but the millions of Americans who supports Hillary does not give a damn what you say about her. I see you with a very low Moral Values and a man who has not been taught proper ethics
in life.

Report this

By Pat, May 25 at 6:22 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

wrong comment
keith is always correct and i appreciate his direct and to the point comments and i never miss his program, because of this, he is the only one on t.v. that has the T###(word that someone described clinton as a man)to speak his mind.
KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK AND TELL THE BOSS TO GIVE YOU A RAISE
Pat

Report this

By Leefeller, May 25 at 6:11 am #

The Olbermann report may have been overdone, especially to those on the fence. Mention the A. word more than once, may not actually be like using the N. word so many times that it actually means nothing.  Except the A word is not just a word to hurt and insult. 

Hillary recruiting for the event in her slimy way, may have only been enhanced by Olbermann, with his added advertising. 

Actually I like what Olbermann has to say, only because I agree with him.

Report this

By cyrena, May 25 at 5:13 am #

You wonder if anyone has ‘noted’ -Mr. Obama’s- comments.

Have you? I only ‘noted’ one response from SENATOR Obama’s campaign, which was to say (and I paraphrase from memory here) that comments of assassinations had no place in campaign discourse. (or words to that affect).

So, have you heard other comments from Senator Obama that should be ‘noted’? If so, please share them with us as DIRECT QUOTES, and the source from which they came.

Here again, I should remind that aside from Senator’s Obama’s comment about HRC sounding like Annie Oakley, and KNOWING BETTER, his campaign has been remarkably restrained.

And, now that I think about it, is there ANYTHING in Keith Olbermann’s ‘specical comment’ here, that is UNTRUE? In other words, has Mr. Olbermann attributed ANYTHING to HRC in his series of ‘notations’ here, that HRC actually did NOT say or do, and should NOT be attributed to her?

I couldn’t find anything...not in the entire list. The only thing that MIGHT be questionable, is whether or not it was Hillary and/or her campaign that was responsible for the one Rove trick that had Senator Obama in native garb at a traditional African ceremony in I believe Kenya. I’m not sure that it can be proven beyond any reasonable doubt that HRC and/or her supporters were responsible for that, though they certainly capitalized on it.

Otherwise, Keith here, has just put together a list of ALL of the distasteful and low class acts that have been the substance of Hillary’s campaign performance.

Now of course we could just disregard her campaign performance, and maybe look to her ‘experience’ of the past, like her record in the Senate.

Oops. That isn’t gonna help either.

So, this isn’t about Olbermann’s ego. It’s about Hillary’s.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, May 25 at 4:58 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The party has a death grip on it’s own throat. We have the politics of the past vying with the politics of the future (maybe not represented by either candidate, but there none-the-less.) We have the convention in a city steeped in hate bigotry, and the politics of the old. we have the old (Hill-the-business-shill supporters) and the young (Token supporters) We have a war in a far off land which has divided the Country, and we have millions of bitter disenfranchised people (I can say that ‘cause I’m not running for office)

Looks like it might be a good show, Clinton has even hinted we might have a “special event.”

Stay tuned

Report this

By cyrena, May 25 at 4:47 am #

OUTSTANDING post i. Q. and much appreciated. I did in fact note your contribution of the excerpt from Keith’s special comment, so you DO get the credit on that. wink
I didn’t however, listen to the entire thing until now, though it was posted on my number one news source (truthout.org) as well.

Anyway, I also noted from a comment by Expat yesterday, (and he and I are usually on the same ideological page) that he felt Olbermann had gone over the top. After hearing the ENTIRE special comment, I don’t. Rather, Keith is consistent in his world view, and speaks to exactly the point, one that DOES remain ‘unspoken’ in a traumatized nation, but still is very close to the surface.

And, I think I made that point in an earlier and rather impassioned response of my own…if this assassination comment had no particular meaning or association beyond the logistics of a primary election, then WHY THE HELL DID SHE SAY IT? Why the hell say something – ANYTHING - that any American leader should KNOW could cause offense, or be misinterpreted, or dredge up old wounds, (at a time when we suffer the same)? TO WHAT GAIN, and to what ‘explanation’?

Beyond that though, Olbermann addressed what I feel is the larger picture of disaster that Hillary represents, and as much as promises. This was just ONE of the many, many, similar threats that she has made, or malicious tricks that she has played…to maintain chaos and instability. It’s the favorite tactic of all dictatorships and other authoritarian regimes. It’s terror. It’s divide and disillusion, (a quote from another poster). It’s malicious, bellicose, and belligerent. It appeals to base fears, and yes again, it is TERROR.

For those among us who choose delusion, and prefer to see this as some sort of ‘strength’ it is NOT. Strength is apparent only when one uses it to ‘win’ without destroying the prize. Hillary does the opposite, and she has since the beginning of this. However, in remember so many of the comments posted here over the months, I have to accept that there are those who will never ‘get that’. I’ve heard that ‘Hillary will still be standing after all is over, and how she can deal with any blows that come HER way, and blah, blah, blah.” It never occurs to these folks that it’s hardly an accomplishment for only HILLARY to still be standing, while the rest of us are all crushed and/or thrown to the side of her bulldozing path.

Meantime, on this:

“…A debt which i’ve heard talk of passing on to Obama’s campaign, a move that i would vehemently object to, but that will probably be the price for Hillary to campaign actively for Obama…”

This would be Hillary’s campaign debt of which you speak; the campaign debt that she incurred as a result of her mismanagement of the enormous funds that she began with. She failed to manage those Wall Street contributions because she didn’t plan for a campaign beyond February. She intended to have it clinched by then, because of course she intended to have the nomination from the beginning anyway. She intended that long, long, ago. Any competitors were simply flies to be easily swatted away. Hillary would stop in and say hello along the pre-planned campaign trail, (in the states that ‘mattered’) and the thing would be decided on Super Tuesday. Obama (and his own supporters) were invisible until they began voting.

But, your point about her bail-out (from the Obama campaign) being the condition/price for her active campaigning on behalf of Obama is probably true. At least that’s what I would have grudgingly admitted before this last attack. Now I have to wonder if there can really be anything at all gained from any future campaigning that HRC or her husband might do. I’d rather spend the money to send her away. Far away..so there might be a chance for some healing.

Report this

By caucusdebacle, May 25 at 3:10 am #

ANYone who thinks for a nano-second that Hillary was talking about anything except primaries frequently going into June or indeed to the convention (Teddy was behind 750 pledged delegates) is in Cloud-Cuckoo Land.
It’s sickening that this kind of odious olbermanniacal nonsense gains any traction. Get a grip.

Just for a reality-check, if you’re one of the delusional who is on a hyena howl of lunatic outrage, I can guarantee you that you are 100% hallucinating. So you might gauge your frantic spittle-spewing rancor against that certain knowledge & look in the mirror & see that your ancient reptilian brain is deceiving you in a frightening way.

Poor rancid Mr. Olbermann has devolved to, as they would put it in the 16th c., re-eating his own vomit.

Report this

By i,Q, May 25 at 2:44 am #

If TruthDig read their own comments they would have noticed that i posted an excerpt from Olbermann’s Special Comment yesterday under Eugene Robinson’s article, and that i deserve credit for the tip, but i guess i’m just being egomaniacal. wink

Speaking of “chest-pounding” egomaniacs, Keith is just my kind. i suggest to CJ that Keith has been fairly restrained up until this whole assassination quotation. But someone has to finally call “bulls#!t” on the bulls#!t that Hillary utters on a now daily basis, and Olbermann is the first. i have been utterly astounded at the way in which the pundits marvel at each new nugget of truthiness (registered trademark of Stephen Colbert) which she utters.

Chris Matthews seems to literally start salivating when she changes a metric here, moves a goalpost there. He is absolutely in love with bulls#!t, the bigger the lie, the greater the politician in his esteem. i don’t know if anyone else noticed, but after the first chastising of the media for using the gaffes and poor politics of the pre-"Kitchen Sink” Hillary campaign against her, and especially after the Pennsylvanians-are-bitter remarks, Matthews began gobbling up the bold-faced lie, bobbing his chin against her testicular fortitude and has been almost combative about Obama’s chances in the fall. In other words, he now thinks she’s the stronger candidate and he’s not afraid to show it. This is the same guy who 6 months ago openly wept at the thought of Barack Obama having the nomination taken from him in a hypothetical superdelegate situation. The guy’s all over the map.

i find it a refreshing change of pace to see Keith call it like he sees it. i think the most useful part of his Special Comment was the list of Hillary’s 18 other triangulations, missteps, and gaffes. It is a road-map for all you sexist-media conspiracy theorists to look at and hopefully see that it is your candidate who has made the mistakes which have left her campaign in second place.

i know it’s a lot easier to believe that an invisible force is working to undermine your efforts than to accept that a bunch of unrelated individuals — your equals — collectively and independently disagree with you.

The Obama campaign has been nothing but gracious and polite to Sen. Clinton echoing the sentiment shared by a lot of his supporters, including me, that she has every right to stay in the race. By all means, she can loan herself as much money as she wants, but make no mistake, when you log on to HillaryClinton.com to donate your dollars, you are paying down her mismanaged campaign debt. A debt which i’ve heard talk of passing on to Obama’s campaign, a move that i would vehemently object to, but that will probably be the price for Hillary to campaign actively for Obama.

So enough with the hysterics and the specious arguments that the losing candidate should be the winner. According to primary and caucus results, there are more of us than there are of you. That’s how winning works. So give us a break on the martyrdom and tell your candidate that as your representative she needs to comport herself with class and dignity, that she should use the money you give her constructively and not destructively, and that she shouldn’t be throwing the image of assassination around lightly.

Report this

By i,Q, May 25 at 1:07 am #

Come on guys, i thought there’d be a lot more self-righteous indignation on this one! Where does Olbermann get off telling “our girl” to stop talking about assassinations while describing her campaign’s rationale for staying in the race? It is not only 100% appropriate to be inserting that idea into the discussion, it turns out to be necessary. As George Santayana said, “those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Here is just another case where Hillary is doing the hard work so we don’t have to. Now that she has reminded us that “young and promising” is dangerous and sometimes gets shot in June while running for President, (and then reminded us yet a third time on Friday), she can rest assured that no such incident will occur because, through her personal sacrifice, we have learned our history.

Thank you, Hillary, for delivering us from the specter of politically charged murder.

Report this