LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.  
 
July 25, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports
 * NEW! * Six Little Words

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Nikki Keddie on Iran

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Truthdig Bazaar
Lords of the Land

Lords of the Land

By Idith Zertal and Akiva Eldar
$ 19.77

more items

 
A/V Booth

MSNBC ‘Calls’ the Race for Obama

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Apr 24, 2008
Chuck Todd

NBC political director Chuck Todd, basking in hypotheticals, repeatedly explains that, while it simply isn’t done, “if we called things like this ... you would say, ‘OK, the pledged delegate count is over.’ ” Guess which of the candidates featured this video on his YouTube channel?

Watch it:

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Post-Pennsylvania Speechifying

Next item: 'Daily Show': Pundits Perturbed by Pennsylvania Primary

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By JD, April 25 at 1:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

> So by your lights, cyr, Hillary is a deranged,

> hysterical woman who would rather kill herself

>than let the “better man” walk? I’m sorry, is that

> putting too sexist a twist on the picture?

I don’t think that’s what he’s saying. The math is against her. She can’t win. So why doesn’t she concede? Because she knows she can help weaken Obama, McCain will win, she can run against McCain in 1012. That’s got to be it!

Report this

By SamSnedegar, April 25 at 1:24 pm #

Here’s what we know: Obama makes a good speech and he is a bright kid.

Does he know why we are in Iraq? If so, and he hasn’t bothered to mention it to us, then he is the same kind of lying pol that we have dealt with for the past 30 years.

Does he know that he automatically loses everything south of VA and MD and east of CA? He must, but he keeps pretending that a black man can win the presidency, and for that lie, he will destroy the Democratic Party.

Here’s the rub: Hillary could have won the Presidency going away had this charismatic negro not come into the race for the Dem nomination and won a bunch of southern states to propel himself into the nomination with the same states which will never ever vote for him in the general.

Not that EITHER candidate or Biden or any of the others could have won over the cheating Repubs, or the Bushitters who likely will foreclose on elections and keep Bush in place for the next ten years, but the ONE candidate who NEVER could win the presidency is the one who kept Hillary from doing it, and did so knowing full well that he could never win it, and you call what she is doing VINDICTIVE?

Shit.

Report this

By tdbach, April 25 at 6:18 am #

So by your lights, cyr, Hillary is a deranged, hysterical woman who would rather kill herself than let the “better man” walk? I’m sorry, is that putting too sexist a twist on the picture? It doesn’t really work very well for a guy-candidate, but lets neuter the image anyway. Hillary is a deranged, desparate politician who would rather commit suicide than let anyone else win. How’s that? Hey, if it can reduce your opponent to something less than human, why not go for it? It’s a lot better than thinking that she might want the job because she actually thinks she is the better candidate, will do a better job if elected, and have more success in advancing progressive ideas like universal health and rational, progressive tax structures, and that there are a whole bunch of people who have put their sweet and blood on the line to help her win this election who might feel betrayed if she just calls it quits while there was some - albeit slender - hope of winning, because, well, you say she should.

This is your “new kind of politics” eh?

Report this

By Russ, April 25 at 5:29 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m a republican and, by way of policy alone, I will not be voting for Sens. Obama nor Clinton.

With that said; I am stymied by most Obama fans. Almost all are willing to completely dismiss a full half of the democratic electorate. While it will be an extremely difficult feat for Sen. Clinton to pull it off, it is not impossible to win in the end. And the “super delegate” system, by it’s very design, was meant for this election.

I want Sen. Obama to win the nomination. He is a deeply flawed candidate (almost unelectable) but it is clear Sen. Clinton may still get the nomination and, as I said above, a full one half of the electorate is voting for Mrs. Clinton. Why do Obama fans dismiss this fact out of hand?

Report this

By cwhipps, April 24 at 8:33 pm #

I’ve been supporting Obama since the day he announced in Springfield. Everything was working for me until sometime last week. I’m not sure if it was the debate or something I heard in the analysis later, but, whenever I hear the “dream ticket” idea float into converstations by the talking heads, I become physically ill, and on a deeper level, something doesn’t seem right. (It’s the same feeling I had when I heard about the planes hitting the WTC on 9/11)

It’s not that I “hate Hillary” (more than any other “corporatist") it’s just that she represents, in my mind, the polar opposite of everything I’d imagined when Obama uses the word “hope.” To hear people say, “well, why don’t they just run together? Wouldn’t that be cool? It would unite the party”, I get the feeling that no one is paying attention to what’s happened to our government.

In my mind, there is no two-party system in Washington. It’s just two different ways of selling the same thing: a kind of neo-fascism. (I call it the “corporatist party") Our representative democracy isn’t representing the American people, it’s representing multinational corporations AGAINST the American people. Worse, the various bases of the two parties are being played for suckers to support something they have been kept unaware of: the undoing of the rule of law, and the bill of rights.

What if the coporatists knew Hillary would never pass the smell test with progressives, so they decided to put her out there, and in this position of dividing the party down the middle where Obama would have to put her on the ticket, they now have a way to sell us back into slavery?

It’s a disturbing thought. (sorry to bore you with it)

Obama-Webb (Gore, McKaskill, Nepolitano, Richardson) ‘08

Report this

By cyrena, April 24 at 4:09 pm #

Wow Jaded Prole..

You really did hit this on the head, just in the title..VINDICTIVE GOAL...that’s exactly what it is now.

It’s the ‘if I can’t have it, nobody will’.

rage made a good point also, in that Hillary is even wiping out her own continued political career in the Senate, and doesn’t seem to care. She’s so intent on the vindictive goal, that she’s failed to realize that she’s wiping her own self out in the same measure.

Kind of like a murder suicide…

Report this

By Joy, April 24 at 3:57 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

We all know that Barack Obama is the winner of the Democratic primary.  Mathematically, there’s no other way.  Unfortunately, we will have to continnue and continue so Mrs. Clinton can keep helping McCain.
Chuck Todd has had it right all along; the numbers are the numbers. 
Independents for Obama ‘08

Report this

By rage, April 24 at 2:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I wish Howard Dean would pull a couple pages from Todd’s book. Shillary needs to be reigned in so the Dems can concentrate on putting Grampers in an assisted living facility that specializes in anger management cases in November. Let Obama select his own running mate, and send Hillary on back to the Senate. Obama can beat McCain solidly without her name appearing anywhere on the ticket.

Dean has got to know Shillary’s tirades are not exactly helping Dems win in November. She’s really crippling herself and singlehandedly dismantling Bill’s legacy with this disengenuous divisiveness. She needs to own up to the reality that she is not the woman America wants in the White House. The shame of this contrariness is going to cost her the New York Senate seat in 2010. By 2012, nobody is going to want to recall ever having gotten within ten political feet of her or Bill. Sadly, though, not before it potentially tears the DNC apart.

Report this

By DennisD, April 24 at 2:21 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I guess everyone can just stay home on election day.

The pundits have already decided the race so you don’t have to waste your time going through the Diebold experience.

Report this

By Jaded Prole, April 24 at 1:58 pm #

It’s no longer about winning the nomination for Clinton. It’s about crippling the Democratic candidate so she can say “I told you so” and run against McCain in the next selection.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.