I wonder how many people now blog under the name “Mike Mid-City” on Truthdig now? Apart from his partner, there could be a few.

They all have differing styles which are quite obvious.... and quite obviously nothing like the sleazy slug we knew as MMC, uhh.

If Sen Obama is stupid enough to attach his political future to the Clintons, then he deserves whatever he gets.

And if she thinks that putting him on her ticket is enough to make the likes of me vote for a Clinton, then she’s got another thing coming.

And no, i’m not a Democrat...i have neither the secret decoder ring nor the propensity for self-destruction that are required to be a part of that club...so if you feel that you must respond with don’t vote for McCain, save it.  I won’t vote for McCain any which way.

I don’t trust Sen Obama any more than i trust any politician, but i actually trust Sen Clinton less than i trust Sen McCain.  At least he doesn’t pretend to be something he’s not.

How could these two candidates reconcile their support of and opposition to the invasion and occupation of Iraq? Impossible.

People support Obama because he opposed the war and he is not Hillary Clinton or John McCain.

More on this in the article ...

“Thoughts on Factors in the Obama Surge”

PopulistAmerica.com
Populist Party of America
February 27, 2008

http://www.populistamerica.com/thoughts_on_factors_in_ the_obama_surge

Thanks Stormy7. I’ll second your motion. Pelosi has turned out to be ineffective, hypocritical and pandering. When she said that impeachment was “off the table”, the left should’ve risen up as one to impeach her instead. She’s been a massive disappointment on all counts. Many on the right can thank her for turning countless hopeful democrats into cynical political dropouts.

I amend the above: Obama has said that he’s ahead in the race, so why should he be considering an offer to run as VP.  That could be construed as negative, i.e. to the suggestion, but it isn’t negative regarding Hillary, whereas Hillary’s deal-breaking comment about Obama most certainly was.

NP was specifically asked about the Dream Ticket idea and she very correctly pointed out that Clinton has stepped on her own tail as far as that possibility goes.  NP wasn’t asked about Obama’s negative comments.

Don’t forget that Nancy Pelosi is a player in this game too.....

“I thlought it was strange that Pelosi chose to criticize Hillary but not Obama’s negative remarks “

The kitchen sink attack strategy is exclusive to the Clinton campaign. Obama’s responses, for the most part, are in direct reaction to Clinton’s attacks. So it is deceptive to present it as both sides stooping to dirty tactics equally.

Right, Tahoe Editor, she’s re-interpreted Hillary Clinton’s comments about Obama as not wanting him as VP although Hillary simply meant that BO shouldn’t be voted for as a presidential candidate.

Hillary has actually just accepted the idea of BO as as VP on a dual ticket...... so who’s deciding all this then, uhh??? Its hardly Hillary’s fault that Obama declined.....

I thlought it was strange that Pelosi chose to criticize Hillary but not Obama’s negative remarks - but perhaps she was simply making the point that neither candidate could accept the prospect of becoming a VP nominee at this stage?

What was signifcant was from what she stated was that it will be very likely that neither Clinton nor Obama will ever be considered as a VP once the presidential nominee is chosen. I said that Obama would find himself out of a job, uhh.

That may or may not still damage the Democrats irreparably at the election, though. The Obama supporters seem naive enough to think that they can carry through alone but they are only one eighth of the voting-age population.

The Democrats are now ‘the frog being heated slowly in a pan of water’ until the Republicans decide that they are cooked! One might even ask if this is not some covert agenda on the part of one of the candidates???

I’m glad Pelosi agrees with me. This dream ticket bullshit is just that. I’m sick of hearing about it too. It’s not going to happen. Get in reality.

Here in Pennsylvania, Billary is pulling out the NAFTA deception again, and because the MSM--with the exception of Keith Olberman, has not confronted the monster Billary with it, she continues to use it without being held accountable.

I wonder if they were gunning for Spitzer--apparently applause spontaneously broke out on Wall St with the news. Big money certainly had cause and it isn’t as if they don’t also frequent call girls. It should be easy enough to gather dirt on the monster Billary--problem is the monster Billary has no shame and why should big money or heavyweight politicians poop on their cakewalk?

Humm,

Not sure if it’s my computer or not, but I just get a blank within the frame that should be the video.

Anybody know what’s up?