Aegrus:

That’s the best you can do?  LOL.  Besides, you are one of the ones here who has consistently touted Obama NOT so much for “the issues” as for his ability to “inspire” - i.e., his rhetoric and character.  So don’t get all “issue-y” on me NOW...LOL.

Peace.

The war, the simple fact that Hillary with all the experience, all the kings men voted to go to a war for opportunists.  Hillary should never have voted for the war, and she should be totally against it now. 

We the people are responsible for the deaths of millions of people, while we eat our cheesecake, I find that irresistible.  In fact I would vote out any politician that voted to let Bush have his war.

You feel Hillary has the experience edge on world policy, being on the committee of emerging Threats, seems to have missed the threats all the way around, I see nothing but a cluster F. 

I do not hate Hillary, but I do feel Hillary knows the people and obviously she does not know how bad her vote for the war makes her look or she would be trying to end it and bring the troops home.

That so many of the supporters of a man who calls for inclusion, tolerance and non-demonization have become increasingly intolerant and demonizing of both Clinton and her supporters, even to the point of “aggressiveness.”

Then you call Obama a “cult of personality”

It is the war for starters, the soft tolerant persona of Hillary Mrs inclusion has been hurt by her action, voting and saying she did not want it to pass is not a very good answer.

The New Man should be rebirthed at the top. We have a network of criminals in government trying to bring about a New World Order which is the same Old World Order. The old nobility from the 19th century realized that they could not re-establish the old feudal order so they had to push for syncretic movements with elements of liberalism and conservativism blended in to fool the mass man. Many of the elements of socialism, communism, and communitarism sound enlightened and laudable, but they are incompatible with the principles of natural rights, individualism and limited government. A system that endeavors to level wealth, insure fairness, and fraternity is going to be in some measure despotic and intrusive.

The goals of the 19th century feudal order was to prevent their overthrow, and replacement by upstarts, innovators, and mavericks. Entreprenneurial capitalism would eventually by replaced with monopolistic capitalism, where change could be controlled and manitpulated to the beneift of the established elites.

If you look at our bloated military budget you will see that much of the technology is control and surveillance technology. The super high taxes after WWII went into military Keynesianism. With the money spent on research we could have eliminated disease, and energy shortages. We could have had the human life span extended for the masses to well over 100 years old.

Much of this spending is to maintain the privileges and perogatives of the elites. In time these elites with their control agenda will figure ways to reduce the global population as the “future does not need us”. This theme is very popular in Hollywood, and frequently what is portrayed in Hollywood frequently comes to pass.

Yes, Maani, even “the Bhagwan” (shri Rajneesh/Osho) couldn’t control his 1,000’s of so-called sannyasins in the ‘70’s. That was the Vietnam war era when meany young people wanted “change”, too.

“...as many as 50,000 Westerners spent time seeking enlightenment ...in Pune, India… with the guru. In 1979, he saw his movement as the route to the preservation of the human race. He said: If we cannot create the ‘new man’ in the coming 20 years, then humanity has no future. The holocaust of a global suicide can only be avoided if a new kind of man can be created...”

Although he taught religious tolerance, he ran his ashram in strage ways and had 93 Rolls-Royces to ferry himself and girlfriend, Ma Sheela, around in. Thus wisdom is corrupted by the actions of “the wise one”. It is easy to fall from the true path once seduced by adoring followers.

He must have known this but perhaps was unable to control them anyway. The price of popularity is to forever pander to the wants and desires of one’s admirers. That is not the path of Truth. It is also why democracies always morph into dictatorships and eventually fail.

Waco County, Oregon, previously known as “The Big Muddy Ranch” http://www.cultsoncampus.com/shree.html

http://www.spp.gov/

The above will speak on the North American Union. The SPP’s own documents will talk about the union, but then they will have a document speaking on the myths which are either strawmen arguments or directly contradict their own plans.

As to Goolsbee, it is well known that he believes in “free trade” policies. Sad to say, no one seems to want to educate poiticians on comparative advantage versus absolute advantage, so we have a brain dead economic policy that kills domestic manufacturing and white collar service sectors.
Please refer to http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_06/b40 70032762393.htm

Curiously, Mr. Goolsbee says that we do not have enough college educated American citizens as we have been slipping in that area. So he would like the government to fund more college education for students. I say that the marketplace for college educations is acting in an absolutely sane maner in accordence to rational economic expectations. It is precisely because we Americans are competing in at absolute economic disadvantage with the rest of the world that young people are making the sane rational decision based on the expected NPV of an education that they would be better off being waiters and waitresses. (I encourage the uninformed reader to research comparative advantage. I only have so much breath.)
So by Goolsbee’s own measuring stick of free markets, where absolute advantage predominates, it is best to get a job in kichen prep as that job cannot be outsourced, except by an open borders immigration policy! For most of this nation’s history we have had 50% trade tarriffs. It was not until trade liberalization took off that we have so many Ph.D.’s driving taxis. And no this perfumed, and besilked fool thinks the problem is we don’t have enough unemployed college grads.
A thousand curses on this relgion of free trade. And Cyrena believes this Obama with his Chicago School poppinjay is going wave the fairy dust of liberal trade policies on the economy, and make everything all better. What cowpies!

Cyrena:

“I also don’t entertain the same conspiracy theories that you indulge it. I have no fear of the CFR, though I don’t agree with all of their policies, or share the ideologies of all of their staff, which has obviously changed over the years. Still, just like all of the other organizations that you look for under your bed like boogeyman, they don’t particularly bother me.”

You are being disingenuous if not blatantly hypocritical here.  After all, you believe that 9/11 was an inside job, and that Bush & Co. were complicit in its planning and/or execution.  THAT is also called a “conspiracy theory.”

So where does your “acceptable” conspiracy theory end and Paracelsus’ “unacceptable” conspiracy theory begin?  Isn’t this a perfect example of “people who live in glass houses should not throw stones?”

Indeed, I find it odd in the extreme that you should believe as you do about 9/11 (with which I agree), yet so ferociously dismiss other, almost certainly related conspiracy theories - some of which have far more solid evidence and substance to support them than the 9/11 theory does.

Peace.

Eggzacleee! De nada.

Paracelsus, for the last time..YOU wrote this stuff...not ME!!

I thought it was very bizarre, but it wouldn’t be the first time. So, YOU slander and defame YOURSELF, and then blame it on me.

And, you wonder why people like me are inclined to agree with your own assessment of yourself.

I’m relived that you’re an individual paracelsus. If there were more of you, the damage might be beyond assessment.

So, I’ll remain grateful for small favors.

Again with the slander, and defamation. Cyrena. I am not what people think I am. I am an individual. You use the tactics of a slimy Stalinist. Of course you have no principles. Remember that in the Soviet system people with contrary ideas were called crazy. You fit the mold of a defamer very well. I am individual unlike you, Cyrena, who must enforce some sort of collective code as to what reality is. Your very viciousness indicts your credibility.