![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Bush on Why the U.S. Didn’t Send Troops to DarfurPosted on Feb 20, 2008
The year is 2008, and President George W. Bush has learned an important lesson in global affairs: “Outside forces” taking part in foreign clashes “tend to divide people up inside their country” and “are unbelievably counterproductive.” Click here to view the clip. Previous item: No You Can't Next item: Letterman on John McCain, Mall-Walker Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By kevin99999, February 26 at 10:06 am # This is laughable convenient rationale. The fact is that U.S. has consistently meddled in and invaded other countries at will.
By JD, February 25 at 11:56 am # The scary thing...is that Bush probably doesn’t see the irony in his comments.
By laughoutloud, February 21 at 5:13 pm # where's the oil?as i’ve said before, the US government will go to war wherever there is oil. there is none in darfur, so of course they won’t go there. and for all the ‘zionist’ critics, if isreal had all the oil and the arab countries had none, you’d better believe that the US would be stock-piling the arab countries with weaponry as they have isreal. its all about the oil, the rest is just filler to keep you talking and not acting, and its working extremely well.
By GW=MCHammered, February 21 at 11:14 am # Top Dollar!Gun prices soar as Lebanon prepares for civil war - says the Dubai-based Arab TV channel, Al Arabiya.
By moe, February 21 at 7:31 am # LearningSo the idiot speaketh from his vast experience! Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article