LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Support Truthdig - Help us give you more
 
July 4, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

The Age of Paine

Designer Vaginas: Is Female Circumcision Coming Out of the Closet?

Palin Will Step Down as Alaska's Governor

I Am Robama, and I Come in Peace

Racial Row in Freemasonry

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
The Age of Paine
A Doctor in the House
The Battle Over the Burqa

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Mark A. Fischer on Joe Torre

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
The Populist Vision

The Populist Vision

By Charles Postel
$28.00

The Yankee Years

The Yankee Years

By Joe Torre and Tom Verducci
$17.79

more items

 
A/V Booth

‘Daily Show’: Bush Channels Woody Allen in Saudi Arabia

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jan 18, 2008
Daily Show
comedycentral.com

Jon Stewart just might be onto something with his analysis of how oil-pricing fluctuations happen—just watch as President Bush (doing his best impression of a certain notoriously neurotic New Yorker), perhaps aware of his diminishing bargaining power in the twilight months of his presidency, bravely speaks on behalf of American oil consumers during his recent Mideast sojourn.

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Johnny Reno, January 24, 2008 at 12:48 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

j9 -

Of COURSE the show will suffer if Jon refuses to go on.  That’s the whole point.  Without writers, shows like the DAILY SHOW are nothing.

As Jon Stewart sees it, he’s contractually obligated to appear as a performer.  He shouldn’t be writing, though, and neither should his staff, and they are clearly writing, unless Stewart is ad-libbing bits and his producers are frantically pulling clips to show behind him that just happen to perfecty illustrate his points.

A scab is someone who does struck work (like writing during a writer’s strike) for a struck company (like Viacom). 

I know he’s in a tough spot, and I know he thinks he’s on the side of the writers.  Stewart’s problem (and Colbert’s, as well) is that he can’t bring himself to do a crappy show, which is what he would get without writers.  He made his choice.  Alas, it’s the choice to scab.

Report this

By j9, January 24, 2008 at 1:27 am #

Don’t you think if Jon Stewart refuses to go on the show will suffer for the worse? The producers keep the “daily show” name and overhaul it with new writers, on-air talent, etc. and the writers are worse off than now. I don’t sympathize with John Oliver but Stewart going on and doing his thing absent sketches and monologues best serves the show and those who work for it in the long run. The scabs are folks like Leno who run the show as if there isn’t a strike going on and who have all the leverage in the world at their disposal but fail to use it. Sticky situation. I would love for shows and their writers to call it quits really stick it to the producers but unfortunately things aren’t that simple.

Report this

By Johanna Swaag, January 21, 2008 at 9:47 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

As a person watching Jon Stewart in Australia,I
cannot say often enough how glad I am that Jon Stewart is back on the air.  I do not care about a writersstrike in the U.S. Once again Jon Stewart thank you for returning, I qas getting withdrawel symptons.  Also thank you Stephen Colbert

Report this

By Johnny Reno, January 21, 2008 at 4:38 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

He’s funny, and I know it’s a downer to mention it, but John Stewart and his correspondents (John Oliver, I’m looking at you) are crossing their own picket line to write this show.  Stewart, Colbert, and others are encouraging others to cross the WGA picket line to appear on their shows. 

John Stewart, Stephen Colbert. and their staffs are prolonging the strike while getting paid to do struck work for struck companies while their union brothers and sisters are out of work.

This, sadly, makes them scabs.  Don’t support them.

Report this

By Expat, January 21, 2008 at 9:28 am #

What a total embarrassment.  What a maroon (Bugs Bunny).

Report this

By Vay, January 19, 2008 at 11:09 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Bush is a cancer male apparently… and I’ve always thought of him as a cancer on society.

Report this

By troublesum, January 18, 2008 at 9:54 pm #

I’ve always known that Bush’s swagger was a put-on.  He’s a cancer male.  Find a good book on astrology and read about cancer males.

Report this

By Rowdy, January 18, 2008 at 6:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

IF Hillary wins… (chill) Samantha Bee will be the star!

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, January 18, 2008 at 5:49 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Now there’s something I’d pay good money to see, GW sobbing under Woody Allen’s victorious foot. The loudest blowhards are always the biggest wimps.

Report this

By Chris, January 18, 2008 at 5:19 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Missing Stewart imitate Bush will be sad after Bush leaves office…but it will be a riot until he leaves! I’ll be happy to see Bush leave, but sad to know Stewart will have to not have him to caricature. (Bush himself does a good enough job of that anyway…)

Focus on the positive. A full year of Stewart lampooning Bush! Every dark cloud has a silver lining.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!





Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.