|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
Bill Maher vs. Rep. Rahm EmanuelPosted on Sep 30, 2007
The “Real Time” host asks one of the Democratic Party’s shining stars the question that seems to be on everyone’s mind: If you hate the war so much, why are you paying for it? Watch it: For more clips from Friday’s “Real Time,” take a trip to The Largest Minority. Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By rodney, October 4, 2007 at 9:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The Democrats fund the war because they want to keep it Bush and the Republican’s war. The minute they cut off the fund’s, they will get blamed for losing a war that is already lost. The moral thing would be to cut off the funding, The political thing is to fund it in the name of supporting the troops and keep it Bushes war. We have no leadership or balls in this country. The Country is run by idiots [BUSH] and patsy Democrats.We are financially destroying our nation leaving war debt to future generations while the Politicans war playing politics with American lives and treasure
Report thisBy Homer Hewitt, October 4, 2007 at 6:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“House Democratic leaders moved swiftly Tuesday to thwart a tax proposal that would pay for the Iraq war, seeking to avoid the label of tax and spend liberals as they head into a spending fight with President Bush.”
Don’t the Dems want to end the war? How long would this war have lasted if we, instead of our grandchildren, were paying for it? A $1 per gallon on gasoline plus a progressive 5-10% surtax on incomes over $50,000.
could have made a huge difference. At least many of us would have done some sacrificing instead of just the troops and their families.
homer http://www.altara.blogspot.com
Report thisBy davide, October 3, 2007 at 7:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The Democrats are not opposed to the war. They are opposed to the manner in which the war has been prosecuted. The argument within elite circles is not over right and wrong, or even over cost and benefit. It is over competence and technique in achieving an objective which is shared by party leaders and their business/financial masters——military and political control of middle eastern oil. The challenge to Emanuel and other Democratic leaders is to co-opt the public’s anti-war sentiment while remaining true to that shared objective—-thus, they sponsor legislation which is certain to fail or draw a veto (preserving the appearance of anti-war fervor) while avoiding the only legislative step certain to end the war (refusal to appropriate funds). The expectation (or hope)is that circumstances on the ground will stabilize and/or the public will ultimately tire and lose interest, so that the shared objective can be pursued without unnecessary distraction.
The war is a test of the elites’ efforts to permanently marginalize the public. The only question is whether the public will comply.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, October 3, 2007 at 3:48 am Link to this comment
Once I thought Maher would shine light into the dark places of government, however, during the past seasons he’s been on the air he’s proven to be another Israel first stooge.
I guess you have to be that if you want to be in the media now days.
Report thisBy PaulMagillSmith, October 3, 2007 at 2:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I read through all the comments and it wasn’t until I got to the last one that the writing on the wall made any sense:
“Impeach Bush and try him for WAR crimes.
BRING OUR MEN AND WOMEN HOME!!!!!!! NOW, God Damn it!!!!! NOW!!!!!”
Thankyou Don Stivers. I don’t understand how it could be more plainly stated.
Report thisBy gronamox, October 2, 2007 at 9:16 am Link to this comment
I don’t know why anti-semites bother to keep writing.
Report thisIf you don’t like Israel, tough. Why don’t you join the Queda and the other effing Terrorists clubs and try to take them out, big mouth (Hezbollah has be pretty quiet-they took a big hit and kept it quiet-a real big hit). Nobody is wiping Israel off the face of the earth, not even the Muslim assholes here in the US, just listen to McCain if you want to know what the US really thinks of muslim fanatics. Rahm is an inarticulate guy who is trying to go for the gold. Maher knows we can’t defund the war. Bush doesn’t need the money from Congress, there is enough scattered in the pipeline to keep it going for years. Besides the kids in the service love it. Please read and don’t watch TV (TV is all sensationalism-and the scandals and atrocities get the ratings). If you read: they are re-enlisting, they are afraid for the Iraqi civilians and want to stop the murderers, they care.
Does that mean the war is good. No, but this ain’t Vietnam. There was nothing in Vietnam but Communists, Iraq has oil..OIL. OIL is important to the US or at least Cheney thinks so.
He wants that effing oil, and forever. So does Obama, so does Hillary, and so does every thinking person in the US. Without, we are in tough shape. The oil companies won’t expand as long as they have big profits and scarcity. If we can get that oil, we can sink OPEC.
By david sadman, October 2, 2007 at 8:12 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Oh sure,
Report thisamerican companies are doing well. Yes building wealth for them, but not for
anyone else because they have slave labor factories in china, india and other anti-labour countries. So please, don’t pretend that WE are doing well. Most of the jobs created in THIS country are slavbe labour and service type work. And please we all know what happens when “average” folk invest in stock. THEY GET SCREWED…ENRON! WORLDCOM….and several others I recall. That woman is a mouth piece for the industry. Has any middle class person with a desire to create a business tried to buy materials? The price has tripled. making it imposssible for these people to build a business and to be independence from big corporation. We are slowly being a slave labour market.
By Lemeritus, October 1, 2007 at 7:32 pm Link to this comment
Tom Joad wrote:
That was pretty disingenious when she said we have an unemployment rate of about 4.5%, 4.5% of the country unemployed, which is virtually full employment ....I mean WOW. For one thing, talk about pay, and averages, for another…by now we ALL know that unemployment figures are fudged right?
——————-
I came across some very distressing numbers today. In a 1979 report prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of Congress (dated, I know, but illustrative), M. Harvey Brenner calculated that for each 1% increase in joblessness, there are 38,886 deaths, 20,240 cardiovascular failures, 494 cases of death from cirrhosis of the liver attendant to alcoholism, 920 suicides, and 648 homocides.
And, as you point out. Tom, 4.5% unemployment is not the true picture—it fails to count those who have stopped looking and those who are underemployed.
Maria Bartiromo is paid to put lipstick on the pig but she’s right about one thing—our economy isn’t our own any more.
Report thisBy Nancy Hatfield, October 1, 2007 at 12:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
So many democrats who are voting to continue funding, whether because they are afraid of “not supporting the troops, or not, I believe is also the corporate OIL “strategic interests” of Democrats as well, in staying because they fear the U.S. not being able to compete in the oil market and the purchase of oil, Dollar versus Euro and OPEC, motivating Democrats, such as Hillary “corporate” Clinton and the Blue Dogs, to stay in Iraq, as they stated during the last debate, UNTIL AT LEAST 2013, IF NOT LONGER—to protect the U.S. embassy which was being built from day one of the invasion in 2003 as a permanent military facility (to control the OIL for U.S. and UK oil companies, along with several other military bases throughout the regions of Iraq. They plan of Democrats is to withdraw? YEAH RIGHT!! The other issue is the country is so completely destroyed it will take 20 years to put it back together for any of the millions of refugees to be able to return. How’s that for bringing democracy to the Iraqi people?????
Report thisBy John Borowski, October 1, 2007 at 12:19 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
They are paying for it because they are a castrated party. Despite their majority they have no power in Washington. Here is a second question, why are you a Laundromat? The washing machines launder clothes and you launder peoples minds. One more piece of evidence that this is a covert dictatorship.
Report thisBy Lord Byron, October 1, 2007 at 10:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I was very disappointed, both with Rahm Emanuel’s response to why the Democrats won’t defund the U.S. occupation of Iraq and the terrible, superficial account of “global economics” by reporter, Maria Bartiromo. First off, Rahm’s reasoning for continuing the funding of the war by giving the U.S. army the equipment it needs to fight in Iraq was atrocious. Rahm is representative of the democratic party leadership which refuses to defund the U.S. occupation for fear of being looked at as “unpatriotic” and being branded traders by the republican party. It’s galling to see a democratic party bend over so overtly to republican politics, in addition to being manipulated and influenced by the Israeli lobby which would love it if the U.S. stayed in Iraq indefinitely. This is so achingly painful to watch. We must be living in the nadir of this country’s so-called democracy. The will of the people is squelched by the leadership of one man and the rest of congress follows suit. As for Maria, she came across terribly. She doesn’t even bother to elaborate on China’s role in the United States economy and why it’s growth is dependent on its consumption of U.S. dollars. As soon as China grows big enough, it might not need U.S. dollars and watch the American economy take a nosedive from which it never recovers.
Report thisBy mary, October 1, 2007 at 9:49 am Link to this comment
I don’t know how much clearer we can be, we want out of Iraq and the ME. We want our middle class standard of living returned, and we want some control put on the criminal acts of our Congress, White House and, most of all, Corp America. The audience response was pretty clear to me…...
Report thisBy Thomas Billis, October 1, 2007 at 8:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I am so proud of Rahm Emmanuel fially he has become a politician echoing the same shit they all do.Support the troops by keeping them where they are being shot and blown up.I am just guessing but if they were brought home because they cut off the funding they probably would not need those new armored vehicles in their hometowns.Bush is callously trying to push this mess onto the next President and the democrats are trying to callously trying to extend this war into the 2008 elections so they can gain power.The Democrats keep saying this is Pres Bush’s war.As long as our kids are over there fighting and dying it is our war and it is incumbent on all of us to stop our war as soon as possible.
Report thisBy rage, October 1, 2007 at 8:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m Don Stivers!
There is no such thing as victory to gained from our unilateral, ILLEGAL, unprovoked invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation which was never a clear and present danger to our citizens and interests. The Bush-Cheney Junta is populated with a rabid pack of lying fiends who need to be impeached and brought to justice before their term ends in 2008. And, our troops need to taken out of Iraq IMMEDIATELY.
Now, we voted in these gutless Democratic cowards, hoping they realized our demand for change enough to at least make plans for implementing effective diplomatic measures where military efforts have miserably failed in accomplishing this undefined mission for battling terrorism. All we got was more useless Pelosi-Reid pandering to these lunatics by the likes of Emmanuel, who does not want to make any Republican remotely uncomfortable. We need to unload all these mofos, to populate the Congress and the Senate with representives who REPRESENT US!
Report thisBy Tom Joad, October 1, 2007 at 6:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
That was pretty disingenious when she said “we have an unemployment rate of about 4.5%, 4.5% of the country unemployed, which is virtually full employment” ....I mean WOW. For one thing, talk about pay, and averages, for another…by now we ALL know that unemployment figures are fudged right? That for one it doesn’t include people that had been unemployed til their benefits ran out. Now they are just jobless.
Report thisBy Christopher, October 1, 2007 at 2:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Rep. Rahm Emanuel, like Speaker Nancy “impeachment if off the table” Pelosi, is the face of the DLC and a huge part of the problem.
Emanuel is such a liar that it’s stunning.
Just the other debate (was it Democratic debate no. 8 or 9?), Hillary said she hoped to have the troops out of Iraq by the end of her first term.
Aw, that would be 2012. 2012 is not the new date for troop withdrawal.
Al Gore, if you’re reading this, please, please save us from these fools and morons and enter the 2008 race for president!
Report thisBy vet240, September 30, 2007 at 9:02 pm Link to this comment
Maria answer the damn question!
How would opening the chinese market reduce the 2 Trillion dollars in loans China holds over us(most of which are a result of the bush war in Iraq and Afghanistan)?
How quick do you really expect china to give up their edge over us with regard to the trade imbalance.
You are nothing more than a Wall Street shill. You should be ashamed.
Report thisBy WriterOnTheStorm, September 30, 2007 at 8:39 pm Link to this comment
Seems to me that there aint much more to say about Iraq until November of next year. Last thing the Dems want is to lose their ultimate wedge issue. How would they ever take back squatter’s rights on the white house if they didn’t couldn’t point their bony fingers at the biggest failing of the current squatter?
Bush knows this. That’s why he still acts so cock sure in the face of limping public approval. He knows that Iraq is going to be the next guy’s problem, and so do the Dems. Everybody has settled in for year of status quo. The fix is in.
Oh we’ll be treated to all the usual posturing on the Potomac, but when you hear it, remember, it’s just the white noise of fake debate that now passes for political discourse.
Other than that, nothing is gonna happen.
Report thisBy Lemeritus, September 30, 2007 at 6:51 pm Link to this comment
Rahm Emanuel’s tepid reception on Real Time was, sad to say, a resounding reflection of the disappointment Maher’s audience felt for this man’s party. It seems that the Democrats have wandered in the desert for so long they continue to mistake every oasis for a mirage. While the Republicans are ever mindful their base, the Democrats refuse to play either to the clamoring of its own base or the temper of the country overall. Their mandate could not have been clearer—end the war. If the political reality is that they don’t have the votes to overcome a filibuster, then let the filibuster come—let the Republicans pay the price. Of the options available to them. however, the Democrats cannot lead, refuse to follow, and will not get out of the way.
Report thisBy rltnshpofcmd, September 30, 2007 at 5:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Okay people, I think we just have to face facts here… The once glorious United States of America, which we all hold dear in our hearts, has quite sadly - jumped the shark like Fonzie. Aaaaay!
I think it’s time for us to scrap this series and start from scratch and throw out the old tired plot devices that were built in from the beginning. Maybe we can get something a little more Heinlinesq and less Kafkaesq this time around.
Report thisBy Don Stivers, September 30, 2007 at 3:11 pm Link to this comment
Screw “Victory”! How many lives of the United States young men and women are WORTH “Victory”? Victory over a country we invaded? And for what? George Bush’s EGO?
I don’t want my tax monies going to a giant can our men and women can hide in. I WANT them home with their families!!!!! Where they are safe!!!!!
Our country is being run by a bunch of God Damn idiots.
Impeach Bush and try him for WAR crimes.
BRING OUR MEN AND WOMEN HOME!!!!!!! NOW, God Damn it!!!!! NOW!!!!!
Report this