![]() ![]() |
|
| |
|
Responses to the PresidentPosted on Sep 14, 2007
Find out what Joe Biden, John Edwards and Rudy Giuliani thought about President Bush’s speech. (Hint: One of them really liked it.)
Joe Biden:
John Edwards:
Rudy Giuliani:
Previous item: 'Family Guy' on Bin Laden Videos Next item: Who Killed the Sheik? Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By boggs, September 22, 2007 at 5:07 pm #
If Rudy gets in the Whitehouse we would have to worry about a mistress living in the Lincoln Bedroom.
Report thisDo we really want to be put through that?
By rowdy, September 17, 2007 at 8:18 pm #
sitting here with my paltry pension and no health care[thank you glorious political leaders], it is difficult to call these multi millionaires losers. but they all make me think of a big steaming pile of dog shit on my threadbare carpet. several trillion dollars would certainly give me a decent living, good health care and a new carpet. not to mention affordable dog training.
Report thisBy mary, September 17, 2007 at 6:40 am #
It would seem Americans would need no response to this fool and his dribble. The Dems need to ignore him and make him irrelevant, this man can not be reasoned with. He doesn’t even know the meaning.......
Report thisBy Mudwollow, September 16, 2007 at 9:34 pm #
When you click on all three of these videos at the same time their messages become more interesting. Of the three obnoxious drivel babblers I personally found Edwards slightly less nauseating than the others. John, try to say now instead of naiho. I know, it’s hard.
Report thisBy don knutsen, September 15, 2007 at 9:58 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
FOX + Guilianni, boy theres a recipe for some straight talk. Notice the footage from Iraq being played of soldiers shaking hands in the market place....all is rosy, should be seeing the roses being tossed to the occupiers any time now. Despite what FOX News, Gulinani, or this White House would have us believe. This is not the atmosphere in Iraq except when there is an orchestrated presence of massive military hardware and soldiers to temporarily insulate a photo op for the camera. Similar to when McCain walked thru the market exclaiming all was rosy there, only to have a suicide bomber strike a day or two after in the same market after our cameras and military support for the photo op had left. Guilianni has no more respect or love for our democracy then the current chimp-in-chief, as slimy a political oppurtunist as there ever was, I’d imagine he’ll be hiring Rove atleast on retainer soon. Because it isn’t about the substance of the man, its only about the perception. Since this administration is still, after all that has come out, in power, we as a country seem to have rendered the truth as quaint and obsolete a concept as say the Geneva Conventions or Habeus Corpus.
Report thisBy boggs, September 14, 2007 at 6:21 pm #
Why should Biden want to give away a trade secret to the neo’s who are going crazy looking for answers?
Rudy is nothing more then an extension of Bush with a slightly higher IO and a couple more marriages.
Rudy like Bush thinks he’s a cut above!
Report thisBy Stephen Smoliar, September 14, 2007 at 2:58 pm #
The good news is that Biden quickly recognized where the focus should be: the question of America’s safety. However, having recognized that America is NOT safer by virtue of our Iraq activities, he then spent the rest of his time ONLY on Iraq. He thus punted on saying anything about how we could BE safer. So he scored points for having the only video to raise a question of substance and then lost them for waffling on the question. As Vonnegut liked to say, so it goes.
Report this